BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33138496)

  • 1. Spectral distortion level resulting in a just-noticeable difference between an a priori signal-to-noise ratio estimate and its instantaneous case.
    Nicolson A; Paliwal KK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Oct; 148(4):1879. PubMed ID: 33138496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A priori SNR estimation and noise estimation for speech enhancement.
    Yao R; Zeng Z; Zhu P
    EURASIP J Adv Signal Process; 2016; 2016(1):101. PubMed ID: 27729928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimators of The Magnitude-Squared Spectrum and Methods for Incorporating SNR Uncertainty.
    Lu Y; Loizou PC
    IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process; 2011 Jul; 19(5):1123-1137. PubMed ID: 21886543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On training targets for deep learning approaches to clean speech magnitude spectrum estimation.
    Nicolson A; Paliwal KK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 May; 149(5):3273. PubMed ID: 34241115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of a priori signal-to-noise ratio using neurograms for speech enhancement.
    Jassim WA; Harte N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jun; 147(6):3830. PubMed ID: 32611151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech enhancement via two-stage dual tree complex wavelet packet transform with a speech presence probability estimator.
    Sun P; Qin J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):808. PubMed ID: 28253659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Noise reduction for heart sounds using a modified minimum-mean squared error estimator with ECG gating.
    Paul AS; Wan EA; Nelson AT
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():3385-90. PubMed ID: 17946177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On Detectable and Meaningful Speech-Intelligibility Benefits.
    Whitmer WM; McShefferty D; Akeroyd MA
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():447-455. PubMed ID: 27080686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Walden TC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incorporation of a modified temporal cepstrum smoothing in both signal-to-noise ratio and speech presence probability estimation for speech enhancement.
    Wang D; Hou Z; Hu Y; Zhu C; Lu J; Chen J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Jun; 155(6):3678-3689. PubMed ID: 38847592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech activity detection and enhancement of a moving speaker based on the wideband generalized likelihood ratio and microphone arrays.
    Potamitis I; Fishler E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2406-15. PubMed ID: 15532671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultra-low-dose CT image denoising using modified BM3D scheme tailored to data statistics.
    Zhao T; Hoffman J; McNitt-Gray M; Ruan D
    Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):190-198. PubMed ID: 30351450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characteristics of Real-World Signal to Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Chipara O; Hasan SS; Welhaven A; Oleson J
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 29466265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Laplacian-based MMSE estimator for speech enhancement.
    Chen B; Loizou PC
    Speech Commun; 2007 Feb; 49(2):134-143. PubMed ID: 18037977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The MAndarin spoken word-Picture IDentification test in noise-Adaptive (MAPID-A) measures subtle speech-recognition-in-noise changes and spatial release from masking in very young children.
    Yuen KCP; Qiu XY; Mou HY; Xi X
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209768. PubMed ID: 30629627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a new approach for speech enhancement algorithms in hearing aids.
    Montazeri V; Khoubrouy SA; Panahi IM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():2857-60. PubMed ID: 23366520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual evaluation of measures of spectral variance.
    Agus N; Anderson H; Chen JM; Lui S; Herremans D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):3300. PubMed ID: 29960505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On pre-image iterations for speech enhancement.
    Leitner C; Pernkopf F
    Springerplus; 2015; 4():243. PubMed ID: 26085973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.