These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33138504)

  • 1. Articulatory tongue shape analysis of Mandarin alveolar-retroflex contrast.
    Luo S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Oct; 148(4):1961. PubMed ID: 33138504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What R Mandarin Chinese /ɹ/s? - acoustic and articulatory features of Mandarin Chinese rhotics.
    Chen S; Whalen DH; Mok PPK
    Phonetica; 2024 Oct; 81(5):509-552. PubMed ID: 39279469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A magnetic resonance imaging-based articulatory and acoustic study of "retroflex" and "bunched" American English /r/.
    Zhou X; Espy-Wilson CY; Boyce S; Tiede M; Holland C; Choe A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4466-81. PubMed ID: 18537397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sibilant Fricative Merging in Taiwan Mandarin: An Investigation of Tongue Postures using Ultrasound Imaging.
    Chiu C; Wei PC; Noguchi M; Yamane N
    Lang Speech; 2020 Dec; 63(4):877-897. PubMed ID: 31888408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the two rhotic schwas in Southwestern Mandarin: when homophony meets morphology in articulation.
    Huang J; Hsieh FF; Chang YC; Tiede M
    Phonetica; 2024 Feb; 81(1):43-80. PubMed ID: 37934113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acquisition of vowel articulation in childhood investigated by acoustic-to-articulatory inversion.
    Oohashi H; Watanabe H; Taga G
    Infant Behav Dev; 2017 Feb; 46():178-193. PubMed ID: 28222332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling the effect of palate shape on the articulatory-acoustics mapping.
    Bakst S; Johnson K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jul; 144(1):EL71. PubMed ID: 30075643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An ultrasound study of Canadian French rhotic vowels with polar smoothing spline comparisons.
    Mielke J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2858-69. PubMed ID: 25994713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Articulatory tradeoffs reduce acoustic variability during American English /r/ production.
    Guenther FH; Espy-Wilson CY; Boyce SE; Matthies ML; Zandipour M; Perkell JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 May; 105(5):2854-65. PubMed ID: 10335635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An Electropalatographic Study of Variability in Arrernte Consonant Production.
    Tabain M
    Phonetica; 2019; 76(6):399-428. PubMed ID: 31048592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic acoustic-articulatory relations in back vowel fronting: Examining the effects of coda consonants in two dialects of British English.
    Gorman E; Kirkham S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Aug; 148(2):724. PubMed ID: 32872991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic characteristics of Punjabi retroflex and dental stops.
    Hussain Q; Proctor M; Harvey M; Demuth K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4522. PubMed ID: 28679267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vocal tract normalization for midsagittal articulatory recovery with analysis-by-synthesis.
    McGowan RS; Cushing S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):1090-105. PubMed ID: 10462814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward articulatory-acoustic models for liquid approximants based on MRI and EPG data. Part II. The rhotics.
    Alwan A; Narayanan S; Haker K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Feb; 101(2):1078-89. PubMed ID: 9035399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A formant study of the alveolar versus retroflex contrast in three Central Australian languages: Stop, nasal, and lateral manners of articulation.
    Tabain M; Butcher A; Breen G; Beare R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Apr; 147(4):2745. PubMed ID: 32359243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The contrast between alveolar and velar stops with typical speech data: acoustic and articulatory analyses.
    Melo RM; Mota HB; Berti LC
    Codas; 2017 Jun; 29(3):e20160117. PubMed ID: 28614459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differential Cue Weighting in Mandarin Sibilant Production.
    Hauser I
    Lang Speech; 2023 Dec; 66(4):1056-1090. PubMed ID: 36882955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An auditory-feedback-based neural network model of speech production that is robust to developmental changes in the size and shape of the articulatory system.
    Callan DE; Kent RD; Guenther FH; Vorperian HK
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 43(3):721-36. PubMed ID: 10877441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the relationship between palate shape and articulatory behavior.
    Brunner J; Fuchs S; Perrier P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3936-49. PubMed ID: 19507976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Articulatory-acoustic kinematics: the production of American English /s/.
    Iskarous K; Shadle CH; Proctor MI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):944-54. PubMed ID: 21361451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.