262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33139058)
1. Effect of bone quality and bone loss level around internal and external connection implants: A finite element analysis study.
Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT; Souza Batista VE; Cruz RS; de Luna Gomes JM; Pellizzer EP
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):137.e1-137.e10. PubMed ID: 33139058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Implant-Abutment Connections, Retention Systems, and Restorative Materials in the Implant-Supported Single Crowns Using 3D Finite Element Analysis.
Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Noritomi PY; de Souza Batista VE; Cruz RS; de Luna Gomes JM; de Oliveira Limírio JPJ; Pellizzer EP
J Oral Implantol; 2022 Jun; 48(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 34091686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of abutment screw preload in two implant connection systems: A 3D finite element study.
Jung WK; Lee WS; Kwon HB
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):474.e1-474.e8. PubMed ID: 31590980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of the prosthetic index on stress distribution in Morse taper connection implant system and peri-implant bone: a 3D finite element analysis.
Zhang WT; Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Wang R; Chen YF; Ding YD; Yang F; Wang LH
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Sep; 22(1):431. PubMed ID: 36180871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical Effect of Prosthetic Connection and Implant Body Shape in Low-Quality Bone of Maxillary Posterior Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
de Andrade CL; Carvalho MA; Del Bel Cury AA; Sotto-Maior BS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):e92-7. PubMed ID: 27447166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parafunctional loading and occlusal device on stress distribution around implants: A 3D finite element analysis.
Borges Radaelli MT; Idogava HT; Spazzin AO; Noritomi PY; Boscato N
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):565-572. PubMed ID: 29724560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the effect of an offset implant configuration in the posterior maxilla with external hexagon implant platform: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DAF; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CAA; Pellizzer EP
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 28222876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical analysis of different implant-abutments interfaces in different bone types: An in silico analysis.
Pellizzer EP; Lemos CAA; Almeida DAF; de Souza Batista VE; Santiago Júnior JF; Verri FR
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2018 Sep; 90():645-650. PubMed ID: 29853134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element analysis of stress extent at peri-implant bone surrounding external hexagon or Morse taper implants.
Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Pereira CA; Alves JL; Henriques B; Souza JCM; López-López J
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Jul; 71():441-447. PubMed ID: 28499606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of different design of abutment and implant on stress distribution in 2 implants and peripheral bone: A finite element analysis study.
Kul E; Korkmaz İH
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):664.e1-664.e9. PubMed ID: 33573834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest.
Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Souza JCM; Alves JL; López-López J; Henriques B
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Sep; 21(12):655-662. PubMed ID: 30693810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.
Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical effect of an occlusal device for patients with an implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis under parafunctional loading: A 3D finite element analysis.
Silva LS; Verri FR; Lemos CAA; Martins CM; Pellizzer EP; de Souza Batista VE
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Aug; 126(2):223.e1-223.e8. PubMed ID: 34099274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of tapered and external hexagon connections on bone stresses around tilted dental implants: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical analysis.
de Faria Almeida DA; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Santiago JF; de Carvalho PS
J Periodontol; 2014 Feb; 85(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 23688104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stress distribution with extra-short implants in an angled frictional system: A finite element analysis study.
de Souza Rendohl E; Brandt WC
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):728.e1-728.e9. PubMed ID: 32694020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stress evaluation of implant-abutment connections under different loading conditions: a 3D finite element study.
Takahashi JM; Dayrell AC; Consani RL; de Arruda Nóbilo MA; Henriques GE; Mesquita MF
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Apr; 41(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 23574455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Single Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Anterior Maxilla, with Different Surgical Techniques and Implant Types.
Verri FR; Santiago JF; Almeida DA; de Souza Batista VE; Araujo Lemos CA; Mello CC; Pellizzer EP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):e191-e198. PubMed ID: 28708909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
