These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33140100)

  • 1. Unexpected Sounds Nonselectively Inhibit Active Visual Stimulus Representations.
    Soh C; Wessel JR
    Cereb Cortex; 2021 Feb; 31(3):1632-1646. PubMed ID: 33140100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional Selection of Feature Conjunctions Is Accomplished by Parallel and Independent Selection of Single Features.
    Andersen SK; Müller MM; Hillyard SA
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jul; 35(27):9912-9. PubMed ID: 26156992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual Surprise Improves Action Stopping by Nonselectively Suppressing Motor Activity via a Neural Mechanism for Motor Inhibition.
    Dutra IC; Waller DA; Wessel JR
    J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(6):1482-1492. PubMed ID: 29305533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring the temporal dynamics of sustained and transient spatial attention using steady-state visual evoked potentials.
    Zhang D; Hong B; Gao S; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1575-1591. PubMed ID: 28258437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concurrent recording of steady-state and transient event-related potentials as indices of visual-spatial selective attention.
    Müller MM; Hillyard S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Sep; 111(9):1544-52. PubMed ID: 10964063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attentional bias to affective faces and complex IAPS images in early visual cortex follows emotional cue extraction.
    Bekhtereva V; Craddock M; Müller MM
    Neuroimage; 2015 May; 112():254-266. PubMed ID: 25818682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of overt and covert attention on the steady-state visual evoked potential.
    Walter S; Quigley C; Andersen SK; Mueller MM
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 Jun; 519(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 22579858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An approach for brain-controlled prostheses based on Scene Graph Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials.
    Li R; Zhang X; Li H; Zhang L; Lu Z; Chen J
    Brain Res; 2018 Aug; 1692():142-153. PubMed ID: 29777674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the feasibility of the steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) to study temporal attention.
    Mora-Cortes A; Ridderinkhof KR; Cohen MX
    Psychophysiology; 2018 May; 55(5):e13029. PubMed ID: 29119621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Steady-state visual evoked potentials reveal enhanced neural responses to illusory surfaces during a concurrent visual attention task.
    Wittenhagen L; Mattingley JB
    Cortex; 2019 Aug; 117():217-227. PubMed ID: 30999213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using frequency tagging to quantify attentional deployment in a visual divided attention task.
    Toffanin P; de Jong R; Johnson A; Martens S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Jun; 72(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 19452603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of spatial selective attention on the steady-state visual evoked potential in the 20-28 Hz range.
    Müller MM; Picton TW; Valdes-Sosa P; Riera J; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; Hillyard SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1998 Apr; 6(4):249-61. PubMed ID: 9593922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multi-command SSVEP-based BCI system based on single flickering frequency half-field steady-state visual stimulation.
    Punsawad Y; Wongsawat Y
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Jun; 55(6):965-977. PubMed ID: 27651060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The dynamic allocation of attention to emotion: simultaneous and independent evidence from the late positive potential and steady state visual evoked potentials.
    Hajcak G; MacNamara A; Foti D; Ferri J; Keil A
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Mar; 92(3):447-55. PubMed ID: 22155660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Global Enhancement but Local Suppression in Feature-based Attention.
    Forschack N; Andersen SK; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Apr; 29(4):619-627. PubMed ID: 27897668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional modulation of neural responses to illusory shapes: Evidence from steady-state and evoked visual potentials.
    Wittenhagen L; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Mar; 125():70-80. PubMed ID: 30711611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliance on visual attention during visuomotor adaptation: an SSVEP study.
    Reuter EM; Bednark J; Cunnington R
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jul; 233(7):2041-51. PubMed ID: 25893908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An amplitude-modulated visual stimulation for reducing eye fatigue in SSVEP-based brain-computer interfaces.
    Chang MH; Baek HJ; Lee SM; Park KS
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Jul; 125(7):1380-91. PubMed ID: 24368034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time courses of attentional modulation in neural amplification and synchronization measured with steady-state visual-evoked potentials.
    Kashiwase Y; Matsumiya K; Kuriki I; Shioiri S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Aug; 24(8):1779-93. PubMed ID: 22360591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural dynamics during repetitive visual stimulation.
    Tsoneva T; Garcia-Molina G; Desain P
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Dec; 12(6):066017. PubMed ID: 26479469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.