These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33140387)

  • 1. Hyperemic contrast velocity assessment improves accuracy of the image-based fractional flow reserve calculation.
    Tar B; Jenei C; Üveges Á; Szabó GT; Ágoston A; Dézsi CA; Komócsi A; Czuriga D; Juhász A; Kőszegi Z
    Cardiol J; 2021; 28(1):163-165. PubMed ID: 33140387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study.
    Tu S; Westra J; Yang J; von Birgelen C; Ferrara A; Pellicano M; Nef H; Tebaldi M; Murasato Y; Lansky A; Barbato E; van der Heijden LC; Reiber JHC; Holm NR; Wijns W;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Oct; 9(19):2024-2035. PubMed ID: 27712739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of left anterior descending artery stenosis of intermediate severity by fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and non-invasive coronary flow reserve.
    Meimoun P; Clerc J; Ardourel D; Djou U; Martis S; Botoro T; Elmkies F; Zemir H; Luycx-Bore A; Boulanger J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jul; 33(7):999-1007. PubMed ID: 27752796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative flow reserve derived from quantitative perfusion imaging may not outperform stress myocardial blood flow for identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
    Stuijfzand WJ; Uusitalo V; Kero T; Danad I; Rijnierse MT; Saraste A; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Harms HJ; Heymans MW; Huisman MC; Marques KM; Kajander SA; Pietilä M; Sörensen J; van Royen N; Knuuti J; Knaapen P
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring Coronary Circulatory Response to Stenosis and Its Association With Invasive Physiologic Indexes Using Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow and Coronary Pressure.
    Lee JM; Hwang D; Park J; Zhang J; Tong Y; Kim CH; Bang JI; Suh M; Paeng JC; Cheon GJ; Koo BK
    Circulation; 2017 Nov; 136(19):1798-1808. PubMed ID: 28851731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discordance Between Fractional Flow Reserve and Coronary Flow Reserve: Insights From Intracoronary Imaging and Physiological Assessment.
    Ahn SG; Suh J; Hung OY; Lee HS; Bouchi YH; Zeng W; Gandhi R; Eshtehardi P; Gogas BD; Samady H
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 10(10):999-1007. PubMed ID: 28521932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computational assessment of the fractional flow reserve from intravascular ultrasound and coronary angiography data: a pilot study.
    Siogkas PK; Papafaklis MI; Sakellarios AI; Stefanou KA; Bourantas CV; Athanasiou LM; Bellos CV; Exarchos TP; Naka KK; Michalis LK; Parodi O; Fotiadis DI
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():3885-8. PubMed ID: 24110580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discordance Between Resting and Hyperemic Indices of Coronary Stenosis Severity: The VERIFY 2 Study (A Comparative Study of Resting Coronary Pressure Gradient, Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve in an Unselected Population Referred for Invasive Angiography).
    Hennigan B; Oldroyd KG; Berry C; Johnson N; McClure J; McCartney P; McEntegart MB; Eteiba H; Petrie MC; Rocchiccioli P; Good R; Lindsay MM; Hood S; Watkins S
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 9(11):. PubMed ID: 27834663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revisiting the Optimal Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Thresholds for Predicting the Physiological Significance of Coronary Artery Disease.
    Modi BN; Rahman H; Kaier T; Ryan M; Williams R; Briceno N; Ellis H; Pavlidis A; Redwood S; Clapp B; Perera D
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 11(12):e007041. PubMed ID: 30562079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sex-Specific Interpretation of Coronary Flow Reserve and Fractional Flow Reserve Metrics, Including Their Companions.
    Kerkhof PLM; Osto E; Tona F; Heyndrickx GR; Handly N
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():7006-7009. PubMed ID: 31947451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Instantaneous wave-free ratio as an alternative to fractional flow reserve in assessment of moderate coronary stenoses: A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Maini R; Moscona J; Katigbak P; Fernandez C; Sidhu G; Saleh Q; Irimpen A; Samson R; LeJemtel T
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018; 19(5 Pt B):613-620. PubMed ID: 29371084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation and comparison of non-hyperemic pressure reserve to fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary artery stenosis: A real world study.
    Aoun J; Lahsaei S; Zahm C; Bhat T; Carrozza JP
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 93(2):250-255. PubMed ID: 30269422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation Study of Image-Based Fractional Flow Reserve During Coronary Angiography.
    Pellicano M; Lavi I; De Bruyne B; Vaknin-Assa H; Assali A; Valtzer O; Lotringer Y; Weisz G; Almagor Y; Xaplanteris P; Kirtane AJ; Codner P; Leon MB; Kornowski R
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 28916602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fractional flow reserve: a clinical perspective.
    Corcoran D; Hennigan B; Berry C
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jul; 33(7):961-974. PubMed ID: 28577046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of image resolution on computation of fractional flow reserve: coronary computed tomography angiography versus 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.
    Liu L; Yang W; Nagahara Y; Li Y; Lamooki SR; Muramatsu T; Kitslaar P; Sarai M; Ozaki Y; Barlis P; Yan F; Reiber JH; Tu S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Mar; 32(3):513-23. PubMed ID: 26507326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic coronary blood flow computation: validation in quantitative flow ratio from coronary angiography.
    Zhang Y; Zhang S; Westra J; Ding D; Zhao Q; Yang J; Sun Z; Huang J; Pu J; Xu B; Tu S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Apr; 35(4):587-595. PubMed ID: 30535657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and reproducibility of fast fractional flow reserve computation from invasive coronary angiography.
    van Rosendael AR; Koning G; Dimitriu-Leen AC; Smit JM; Montero-Cabezas JM; van der Kley F; Jukema JW; Reiber JHC; Bax JJ; Scholte AJHA
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1305-1312. PubMed ID: 28642995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of the acute Pd/Pa drop after intracoronary nitroglycerin infusion to rule out significant FFR: CANICA (Can intracoronary nitroglycerin predict fractional flow reserve without adenosine?) multicenter study.
    Martin-Reyes R; de la Torre Hernandez JM; Franco-Pelaez J; Lopez-Palop R; Telleria Arrieta M; Amat Santos IJ; Carrillo Saez P; Sanchez-Recalde A; Sanmartin Pena JC; Garcia Camarero T; Brugaletta S; Gimeno de Carlos F; Pinero A; Sorto Sanchez DC; Frutos A; Lasa Larraya G; Navarro F; Farre J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Feb; 87(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 26213338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship between the basal coronary translesional pressure ratio and fractional flow reserve.
    Wilson WM; Shah ASV; Birse D; Harley E; Northridge DB; Uren NG
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 90(5):745-753. PubMed ID: 28766832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic cutoff for pressure drop coefficient in relation to fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve: A patient-level analysis.
    Kolli KK; van de Hoef TP; Effat MA; Banerjee RK; Peelukhana SV; Succop P; Leesar MA; Imran A; Piek JJ; Helmy TA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Feb; 87(2):273-82. PubMed ID: 26424295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.