These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33140432)

  • 1. Raking and regression calibration: Methods to address bias from correlated covariate and time-to-event error.
    Oh EJ; Shepherd BE; Lumley T; Shaw PA
    Stat Med; 2021 Feb; 40(3):631-649. PubMed ID: 33140432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved generalized raking estimators to address dependent covariate and failure-time outcome error.
    Oh EJ; Shepherd BE; Lumley T; Shaw PA
    Biom J; 2021 Jun; 63(5):1006-1027. PubMed ID: 33709462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Considerations for analysis of time-to-event outcomes measured with error: Bias and correction with SIMEX.
    Oh EJ; Shepherd BE; Lumley T; Shaw PA
    Stat Med; 2018 Apr; 37(8):1276-1289. PubMed ID: 29193180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semiparametric regression calibration for general hazard models in survival analysis with covariate measurement error; surprising performance under linear hazard.
    Wang CY; Song X
    Biometrics; 2021 Jun; 77(2):561-572. PubMed ID: 32557567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Expected estimating equations via EM for proportional hazards regression with covariate misclassification.
    Wang CY; Song X
    Biostatistics; 2013 Apr; 14(2):351-65. PubMed ID: 23178735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of composite endpoints with component-wise censoring in the presence of differential visit schedules.
    Eaton AA; Zabor EC
    Stat Med; 2022 Apr; 41(9):1599-1612. PubMed ID: 35043427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regression analysis when covariates are regression parameters of a random effects model for observed longitudinal measurements.
    Wang CY; Wang N; Wang S
    Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):487-95. PubMed ID: 10877308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation in the Cox survival regression model with covariate measurement error and a changepoint.
    Agami S; Zucker DM; Spiegelman D
    Biom J; 2020 Sep; 62(5):1139-1163. PubMed ID: 32003495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regression calibration to correct correlated errors in outcome and exposure.
    Shaw PA; He J; Shepherd BE
    Stat Med; 2021 Jan; 40(2):271-286. PubMed ID: 33086428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An approximate quasi-likelihood approach for error-prone failure time outcomes and exposures.
    Boe LA; Tinker LF; Shaw PA
    Stat Med; 2021 Oct; 40(23):5006-5024. PubMed ID: 34519082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of error-prone survival data under additive hazards models: measurement error effects and adjustments.
    Yan Y; Yi GY
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2016 Jul; 22(3):321-42. PubMed ID: 26328545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Linear mixed models for replication data to efficiently allow for covariate measurement error.
    Bartlett JW; De Stavola BL; Frost C
    Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(25):3158-78. PubMed ID: 19777493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bias analysis and the simulation-extrapolation method for survival data with covariate measurement error under parametric proportional odds models.
    Yi GY; He W
    Biom J; 2012 May; 54(3):343-60. PubMed ID: 22685001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using Sensitivity Analyses for Unobserved Confounding to Address Covariate Measurement Error in Propensity Score Methods.
    Rudolph KE; Stuart EA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 187(3):604-613. PubMed ID: 28992211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using audit information to adjust parameter estimates for data errors in clinical trials.
    Shepherd BE; Shaw PA; Dodd LE
    Clin Trials; 2012 Dec; 9(6):721-9. PubMed ID: 22848072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regression calibration with heteroscedastic error variance.
    Spiegelman D; Logan R; Grove D
    Int J Biostat; 2011; 7(1):4. PubMed ID: 22848187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulation Extrapolation Method for Cox Regression Model with a Mixture of Berkson and Classical Errors in the Covariates using Calibration Data.
    Tapsoba JD; Chao EC; Wang CY
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Apr; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30954972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian analysis for partly linear Cox model with measurement error and time-varying covariate effect.
    Pan A; Song X; Huang H
    Stat Med; 2022 Oct; 41(23):4666-4681. PubMed ID: 35899596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exposure misclassification in propensity score-based time-to-event data analysis.
    Yang Y; Wang M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 May; 30(5):1347-1357. PubMed ID: 33826453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.