230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3314061)
1. Radical prostatectomy, preservation of sexual function, cancer control. The controversy.
Walsh PC
Urol Clin North Am; 1987 Nov; 14(4):663-73. PubMed ID: 3314061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radical retropubic prostatectomy with reduced morbidity: an anatomic approach.
Walsh PC
NCI Monogr; 1988; (7):133-7. PubMed ID: 3173499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The New York University nerve sparing algorithm decreases the rate of positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Shah O; Robbins DA; Melamed J; Lepor H
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2147-52. PubMed ID: 12771737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does a nerve-sparing technique or potency affect continence after open radical retropubic prostatectomy?
Marien TP; Lepor H
BJU Int; 2008 Dec; 102(11):1581-4. PubMed ID: 18808410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Current results and patient selection for nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Steiner MS
Semin Urol Oncol; 1995 Aug; 13(3):204-14. PubMed ID: 8521134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Association of surgeon subjective characterization of nerve sparing quality with potency following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Levinson AW; Pavlovich CP; Ward NT; Link RE; Mettee LZ; Su LM
J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1510-4. PubMed ID: 18295270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Health-related quality-of-life outcomes after anatomic retropubic radical prostatectomy in the phosphodiesterase type 5 ERA: impact of neurovascular bundle preservation.
Haffner MC; Landis PK; Saigal CS; Carter HB; Freedland SJ
Urology; 2005 Aug; 66(2):371-6. PubMed ID: 16040103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient selection for, results of, and impact on tumor resection of potency-sparing radical prostatectomy.
Catalona WJ
Urol Clin North Am; 1990 Nov; 17(4):819-26. PubMed ID: 2219579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation.
Chien GW; Mikhail AA; Orvieto MA; Zagaja GP; Sokoloff MH; Brendler CB; Shalhav AL
Urology; 2005 Aug; 66(2):419-23. PubMed ID: 16040100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving the preservation of the urethral sphincter and neurovascular bundles during open radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Montorsi F; Salonia A; Suardi N; Gallina A; Zanni G; Briganti A; Deho' F; Naspro R; Farina E; Rigatti P
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):938-45. PubMed ID: 16257111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is laparoscopic unilateral sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy effective in retaining sexual potency?
Porpiglia F; Ragni F; Terrone C; Renard J; Musso F; Grande S; Cracco C; Ghignone G; Scarpa RM
BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(9):1267-71. PubMed ID: 15892814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors predicting preservation of erectile function in men undergoing open radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Marien T; Sankin A; Lepor H
J Urol; 2009 Apr; 181(4):1817-22. PubMed ID: 19233413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for patients with lower rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy.
Liang JT; Lai HS; Lee PH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1285-7. PubMed ID: 17235719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Potency following radical prostatectomy with wide unilateral excision of the neurovascular bundle.
Walsh PC; Epstein JI; Lowe FC
J Urol; 1987 Oct; 138(4):823-7. PubMed ID: 3656538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Preservation of erectile function in patients with prostatic cancer after radical prostatectomy].
Pushkar' DIu; Bormotin AV; Rasner PI
Urologiia; 2007; (1):5-10. PubMed ID: 17471990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hydrodissection of neurovascular bundles during open radical prostatectomy improves postoperative potency.
Patel MI; Spernat D; Lopez-Corona E
J Urol; 2011 Jul; 186(1):233-7. PubMed ID: 21575963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dissociation of sexual function and sexual bother following autologous sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy.
Kuwata Y; Muneuchi G; Igawa HH; Tsukuda F; Inui M; Kakehi Y
Int J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):510-4. PubMed ID: 17593095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cavernous nerve graft reconstruction during radical prostatectomy or radical cystectomy: safe and technically feasible.
Anastasiadis AG; Benson MC; Rosenwasser MP; Salomon L; El-Rashidy H; Ghafar MA; McKiernan JM; Burchardt M; Shabsigh R
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2003; 6(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 12664067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Techniques for neurovascular bundle preservation during retropubic radical prostatectomy].
González J; Hernández E
Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Apr; 64(3):156-67. PubMed ID: 21487166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Potency-sparing radical perineal prostatectomy].
Jakse G; Brehmer B; Borchers H; Verger-Kuhnke A; Biesterfeld S
Urologe A; 2003 Mar; 42(3):382-6. PubMed ID: 12671772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
