218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33143178)
1. Effects of Task-Specific and Strength Training on Simulated Military Task Performance in Soldiers.
Ojanen T; Häkkinen K; Hanhikoski J; Kyröläinen H
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(21):. PubMed ID: 33143178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Twelve weeks of concurrent resistance and interval training improves military occupational task performance in men and women.
Sterczala AJ; Krajewski KT; Peterson PA; Sekel NM; Lovalekar M; Wardle SL; O'Leary TJ; Greeves JP; Flanagan SD; Connaboy C; Nindl BC
Eur J Sport Sci; 2023 Dec; 23(12):2411-2424. PubMed ID: 37517090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Physical training considerations for optimizing performance in essential military tasks.
Vaara JP; Groeller H; Drain J; Kyröläinen H; Pihlainen K; Ojanen T; Connaboy C; Santtila M; Agostinelli P; Nindl BC
Eur J Sport Sci; 2022 Jan; 22(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 34006204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. U.S. Army Physical Demands Study: Differences in Physical Fitness and Occupational Task Performance Between Trainees and Active Duty Soldiers.
Canino MC; Foulis SA; Zambraski EJ; Cohen BS; Redmond JE; Hauret KG; Frykman PN; Sharp MA
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Jul; 33(7):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 29952870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in strength and power performance and serum hormone concentrations during 12 weeks of task-specific or strength training in conscripts.
Ojanen T; Kyröläinen H; Kozharskaya E; Häkkinen K
Physiol Rep; 2020 May; 8(9):e14422. PubMed ID: 32378340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functional physical training improves women's military occupational performance.
Nindl BC; Eagle SR; Frykman PN; Palmer C; Lammi E; Reynolds K; Allison K; Harman E
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S91-S97. PubMed ID: 28986086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High-Intensity Functional Training Induces Superior Training Adaptations Compared With Traditional Military Physical Training.
Helén J; Kyröläinen H; Ojanen T; Pihlainen K; Santtila M; Heikkinen R; Vaara JP
J Strength Cond Res; 2023 Dec; 37(12):2477-2483. PubMed ID: 37387578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Body mass index predicts selected physical fitness attributes but is not associated with performance on military relevant tasks in U.S. Army Soldiers.
Pierce JR; DeGroot DW; Grier TL; Hauret KG; Nindl BC; East WB; McGurk MS; Jones BH
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S79-S84. PubMed ID: 28919497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. U.S. Army Physical Demands Study: Reliability of Simulations of Physically Demanding Tasks Performed by Combat Arms Soldiers.
Foulis SA; Redmond JE; Frykman PN; Warr BJ; Zambraski EJ; Sharp MA
J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Dec; 31(12):3245-3252. PubMed ID: 28368954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. United States Army physical readiness training: rationale and evaluation of the physical training doctrine.
Knapik JJ; Rieger W; Palkoska F; Van Camp S; Darakjy S
J Strength Cond Res; 2009 Jul; 23(4):1353-62. PubMed ID: 19528858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lower-body muscular power predicts performance on urban combat simulation.
Sankari M; Vaara JP; Pihlainen K; Ojanen T; Kyröläinen H
Work; 2024; 77(4):1331-1340. PubMed ID: 38517830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimising training adaptations and performance in military environment.
Kyröläinen H; Pihlainen K; Vaara JP; Ojanen T; Santtila M
J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1131-1138. PubMed ID: 29428505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perspectives on Aerobic and Strength Influences on Military Physical Readiness: Report of an International Military Physiology Roundtable.
Friedl KE; Knapik JJ; Häkkinen K; Baumgartner N; Groeller H; Taylor NA; Duarte AF; Kyröläinen H; Jones BH; Kraemer WJ; Nindl BC
J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S10-23. PubMed ID: 26506170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship of Anthropometric Measures on Female Trainees' and Active Duty Soldiers' Performance of Common Soldiering Tasks.
Redmond JE; Cohen BS; Haven CC; Pierce JR; Foulis SA; Frykman PN; Canino MC; Sharp MA
Mil Med; 2020 Jan; 185(Suppl 1):376-382. PubMed ID: 32074313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting Soldier Task Performance From Physical Fitness Tests: Reliability and Construct Validity of a Soldier Task Test Battery.
Spiering BA; Walker LA; Larcom K; Frykman PN; Allison SC; Sharp MA
J Strength Cond Res; 2021 Oct; 35(10):2749-2755. PubMed ID: 31343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Mixed Basic Military Training on the Physical Fitness of Male and Female Soldiers.
Wood PS; Grant CC; du Toit PJ; Fletcher L
Mil Med; 2017 Jul; 182(7):e1771-e1779. PubMed ID: 28810971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A 2-Month Linear Periodized Resistance Exercise Training Improved Musculoskeletal Fitness and Specific Conditioning of Navy Cadets.
Vantarakis A; Chatzinikolaou A; Avloniti A; Vezos N; Douroudos II; Draganidis D; Jamurtas AZ; Kambas A; Kalligeros S; Fatouros IG
J Strength Cond Res; 2017 May; 31(5):1362-1370. PubMed ID: 27548791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of training frequency on fitness levels and perceived health status in deployed National Guard soldiers.
Warr BJ; Scofield DE; Spiering BA; Alvar BA
J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Feb; 27(2):315-22. PubMed ID: 23222077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of Military Training and Standardized Nutrition in Military Unit on Soldiers' Nutritional Status and Physical Fitness.
Tomczak A; Bertrandt J; Kłos A; Kłos K
J Strength Cond Res; 2016 Oct; 30(10):2774-80. PubMed ID: 25268293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Load-Carriage Conditioning Elicits Task-Specific Physical and Psychophysical Improvements in Males.
Wills JA; Saxby DJ; Glassbrook DJ; Doyle TLA
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Sep; 33(9):2338-2343. PubMed ID: 31269002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
