These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33143999)

  • 1. The Formant Bandwidth as a Measure of Vowel Intelligibility in Dysphonic Speech.
    Ishikawa K; Webster J
    J Voice; 2023 Mar; 37(2):173-177. PubMed ID: 33143999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perception and Acoustic Studies of Vowel Intelligibility in Dysphonic Speech.
    Ishikawa K; Nudelman C; Park S; Ketring C
    J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):659.e11-659.e24. PubMed ID: 31952898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intelligibility of dysphonic speech in auralized classrooms.
    Bottalico P; Murgia S; Puglisi GE; Astolfi A; Ishikawa K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Oct; 150(4):2912. PubMed ID: 34717474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic vowel analysis and speech intelligibility in young adult Hebrew speakers: Developmental dysarthria versus typical development.
    Carl M; Icht M
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2021 Mar; 56(2):283-298. PubMed ID: 33522087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vowel contrast and speech intelligibility in dysarthria.
    Kim H; Hasegawa-Johnson M; Perlman A
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2011; 63(4):187-94. PubMed ID: 20938200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vowel Acoustics and Speech Intelligibility in Young Adults With Down Syndrome.
    Carl M; Kent RD; Levy ES; Whalen DH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Mar; 63(3):674-687. PubMed ID: 32160481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Durations of American English vowels by native and non-native speakers: acoustic analyses and perceptual effects.
    Liu C; Jin SH; Chen CT
    Lang Speech; 2014 Jun; 57(Pt 2):238-53. PubMed ID: 25102608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imitating dysphonic voice: a suitable technique to create speech stimuli for spoken language processing tasks?
    Schiller IS; Remacle A; Morsomme D
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2020 Dec; 45(4):143-150. PubMed ID: 31496330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: acoustic characteristics of vowels.
    Ferguson SH; Kewley-Port D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1241-55. PubMed ID: 17905909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic analysis of vowels following glossectomy.
    Whitehill TL; Ciocca V; Chan JC; Samman N
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):135-40. PubMed ID: 16428229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of Background Noise on Intelligibility of Dysphonic Speech.
    Ishikawa K; Boyce S; Kelchner L; Powell MG; Schieve H; de Alarcon A; Khosla S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 60(7):1919-1929. PubMed ID: 28679008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of a Landmark-Based Method for Acoustic Analysis of Dysphonic Speech.
    Ishikawa K; Rao MB; MacAuslan J; Boyce S
    J Voice; 2020 Jul; 34(4):645.e11-645.e18. PubMed ID: 30642708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of cepstral analyses for differentiating normal from dysphonic voices: a comparative study of connected speech versus sustained vowel in European Portuguese female speakers.
    Brinca LF; Batista AP; Tavares AI; Gonçalves IC; Moreno ML
    J Voice; 2014 May; 28(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 24491499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vowel intelligibility in classical singing.
    Gregg JW; Scherer RC
    J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):198-210. PubMed ID: 16139988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of Dysphonia and Cognitive-Perceptual Listener Strategies on Speech Intelligibility.
    Porcaro CK; Evitts PM; King N; Hood C; Campbell E; White L; Veraguas J
    J Voice; 2020 Sep; 34(5):806.e7-806.e18. PubMed ID: 31031103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic analysis of vowel formant frequencies in genetically-related and non-genetically related speakers with implications for forensic speaker comparison.
    Cavalcanti JC; Eriksson A; Barbosa PA
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246645. PubMed ID: 33600430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.
    Liu C; Jin SH
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting Intelligibility Deficit in Dysphonic Speech with Cepstral Peak Prominence.
    Ishikawa K; de Alarcon A; Khosla S; Kelchner L; Silbert N; Boyce S
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2018 Feb; 127(2):69-78. PubMed ID: 29224360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of formant centralization ratio for vowel impairment detection in normal hearing and different degrees of hearing impairment.
    Naderifar E; Ghorbani A; Moradi N; Ansari H
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2019 Dec; 44(4):159-165. PubMed ID: 30644324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dysphonia Interference in Schoolteachers' Speech Intelligibility in the Classroom.
    Oliveira GMGF; de Melo DC; Serra LSM; Granjeiro RC; Sampaio ALL
    J Voice; 2024 Mar; 38(2):316-324. PubMed ID: 34772594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.