These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33144989)

  • 1. An assessment of sampling designs using SCR analyses to estimate abundance of boreal caribou.
    McFarlane S; Manseau M; Steenweg R; Hervieux D; Hegel T; Slater S; Wilson PJ
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Oct; 10(20):11631-11642. PubMed ID: 33144989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Precision and bias of spatial capture-recapture estimates: A multi-site, multi-year Utah black bear case study.
    Schmidt GM; Graves TA; Pederson JC; Carroll SL
    Ecol Appl; 2022 Jul; 32(5):e2618. PubMed ID: 35368131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial capture-recapture model performance with known small-mammal densities.
    Gerber BD; Parmenter RR
    Ecol Appl; 2015 Apr; 25(3):695-705. PubMed ID: 26214915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simulation-based validation of spatial capture-recapture models: A case study using mountain lions.
    Paterson JT; Proffitt K; Jimenez B; Rotella J; Garrott R
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215458. PubMed ID: 31002709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatially explicit capture recapture density estimates: Robustness, accuracy and precision in a long-term study of jaguars (Panthera onca).
    Harmsen BJ; Foster RJ; Quigley H
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0227468. PubMed ID: 32511240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trap array configuration influences estimates and precision of black bear density and abundance.
    Wilton CM; Puckett EE; Beringer J; Gardner B; Eggert LS; Belant JL
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e111257. PubMed ID: 25350557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating Size and Trend of the North Interlake Woodland Caribou Population Using Fecal-DNA and Capture-Recapture Models.
    Hettinga PN; Arnason AN; Manseau M; Cross D; Whaley K; Wilson PJ
    J Wildl Manage; 2012 Aug; 76(6):1153-1164. PubMed ID: 22973066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating and integrating spatial capture-recapture models with data of variable individual identifiability.
    Ruprecht JS; Eriksson CE; Forrester TD; Clark DA; Wisdom MJ; Rowland MM; Johnson BK; Levi T
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Oct; 31(7):e02405. PubMed ID: 34245619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Occupancy data improves parameter precision in spatial capture-recapture models.
    Jiménez J; Díaz-Ruiz F; Monterroso P; Tobajas J; Ferreras P
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Aug; 12(8):e9250. PubMed ID: 36052294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimal sampling design for spatial capture-recapture.
    Dupont G; Royle JA; Nawaz MA; Sutherland C
    Ecology; 2021 Mar; 102(3):e03262. PubMed ID: 33244753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining Temporal Sample Scale and Model Choice with Spatial Capture-Recapture Models in the Common Leopard Panthera pardus.
    Goldberg JF; Tempa T; Norbu N; Hebblewhite M; Mills LS; Wangchuk TR; Lukacs P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0140757. PubMed ID: 26536231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abundance estimation for line transect sampling: A comparison of distance sampling and spatial capture-recapture models.
    Crum NJ; Neyman LC; Gowan TA
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0252231. PubMed ID: 34048456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of spatial capture-recapture models with repurposed data: Assessing estimator robustness for retrospective applications.
    Smith JB; Stevens BS; Etter DR; Williams DM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236978. PubMed ID: 32797083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A review of spatial capture-recapture: Ecological insights, limitations, and prospects.
    Tourani M
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Jan; 12(1):e8468. PubMed ID: 35127014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An empirical demonstration of the effect of study design on density estimations.
    Nawaz MA; Khan BU; Mahmood A; Younas M; Din JU; Sutherland C
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):13104. PubMed ID: 34162926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confronting spatial capture-recapture models with realistic animal movement simulations.
    Theng M; Milleret C; Bracis C; Cassey P; Delean S
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3676. PubMed ID: 35253209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Considerations on effort, precision and accuracy for long-term monitoring of African lions (
    Ball IA; Marneweck DG; Elliot NB; Gopalaswamy AM; Fritz H; Venter JA
    Ecol Evol; 2023 Jul; 13(7):e10291. PubMed ID: 37470026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimization of capture-recapture monitoring of elusive species illustrated with a threatened grasshopper.
    Bröder L; Tatin L; Hochkirch A; Schuld A; Pabst L; Besnard A
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):743-753. PubMed ID: 31825105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pairing field methods to improve inference in wildlife surveys while accommodating detection covariance.
    Clare J; McKinney ST; DePue JE; Loftin CS
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Oct; 27(7):2031-2047. PubMed ID: 28644579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recommended survey designs for occupancy modelling using motion-activated cameras: insights from empirical wildlife data.
    Shannon G; Lewis JS; Gerber BD
    PeerJ; 2014; 2():e532. PubMed ID: 25210658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.