These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33145005)

  • 1. Using Continuous-Time Spatial Capture-Recapture models to make inference about animal activity patterns.
    Distiller GB; Borchers DL; Foster RJ; Harmsen BJ
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Oct; 10(20):e6822. PubMed ID: 33145005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A hierarchical model for estimating the spatial distribution and abundance of animals detected by continuous-time recorders.
    Dorazio RM; Karanth KU
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176966. PubMed ID: 28520796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A local evaluation of the individual state-space to scale up Bayesian spatial capture-recapture.
    Milleret C; Dupont P; Bonenfant C; Brøseth H; Flagstad Ø; Sutherland C; Bischof R
    Ecol Evol; 2019 Jan; 9(1):352-363. PubMed ID: 30680119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatially explicit capture recapture density estimates: Robustness, accuracy and precision in a long-term study of jaguars (Panthera onca).
    Harmsen BJ; Foster RJ; Quigley H
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0227468. PubMed ID: 32511240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Confronting spatial capture-recapture models with realistic animal movement simulations.
    Theng M; Milleret C; Bracis C; Cassey P; Delean S
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3676. PubMed ID: 35253209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrated animal movement and spatial capture-recapture models: Simulation, implementation, and inference.
    Gardner B; McClintock BT; Converse SJ; Hostetter NJ
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3771. PubMed ID: 35638187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An integrated path for spatial capture-recapture and animal movement modeling.
    McClintock BT; Abrahms B; Chandler RB; Conn PB; Converse SJ; Emmet RL; Gardner B; Hostetter NJ; Johnson DS
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3473. PubMed ID: 34270790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of spatial capture-recapture models with repurposed data: Assessing estimator robustness for retrospective applications.
    Smith JB; Stevens BS; Etter DR; Williams DM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236978. PubMed ID: 32797083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Precision and bias of spatial capture-recapture estimates: A multi-site, multi-year Utah black bear case study.
    Schmidt GM; Graves TA; Pederson JC; Carroll SL
    Ecol Appl; 2022 Jul; 32(5):e2618. PubMed ID: 35368131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved inferences about landscape connectivity from spatial capture-recapture by integration of a movement model.
    Dupont G; Linden DW; Sutherland C
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3544. PubMed ID: 34626121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Occupancy data improves parameter precision in spatial capture-recapture models.
    Jiménez J; Díaz-Ruiz F; Monterroso P; Tobajas J; Ferreras P
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Aug; 12(8):e9250. PubMed ID: 36052294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How does spatial study design influence density estimates from spatial capture-recapture models?
    Sollmann R; Gardner B; Belant JL
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e34575. PubMed ID: 22539949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Open population maximum likelihood spatial capture-recapture.
    Glennie R; Borchers DL; Murchie M; Harmsen BJ; Foster RJ
    Biometrics; 2019 Dec; 75(4):1345-1355. PubMed ID: 31045249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial capture--recapture models for jointly estimating population density and landscape connectivity.
    Royle JA; Chandler RB; Gazenski KD; Graves TA
    Ecology; 2013 Feb; 94(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 23691647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating density-weighted connectivity of black bears (Ursus americanus) in Glacier National Park with spatial capture-recapture models.
    Carroll SL; Schmidt GM; Waller JS; Graves TA
    Mov Ecol; 2024 Jan; 12(1):8. PubMed ID: 38263096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A flexible framework for spatial capture-recapture with unknown identities.
    van Dam-Bates P; Papathomas M; Stevenson BC; Fewster RM; Turek D; Stewart FEC; Borchers DL
    Biometrics; 2024 Jan; 80(1):. PubMed ID: 38372400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial capture-recapture model performance with known small-mammal densities.
    Gerber BD; Parmenter RR
    Ecol Appl; 2015 Apr; 25(3):695-705. PubMed ID: 26214915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A spatial capture-recapture model for group-living species.
    Emmet RL; Augustine BC; Abrahms B; Rich LN; Gardner B
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3576. PubMed ID: 34714927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating and integrating spatial capture-recapture models with data of variable individual identifiability.
    Ruprecht JS; Eriksson CE; Forrester TD; Clark DA; Wisdom MJ; Rowland MM; Johnson BK; Levi T
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Oct; 31(7):e02405. PubMed ID: 34245619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Jaguar (
    Foster RJ; Harmsen BJ; Urbina YL; Wooldridge RL; Doncaster CP; Quigley H; Figueroa OA
    J Mammal; 2020 Dec; 101(6):1622-1637. PubMed ID: 33505226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.