These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33146339)

  • 1. Effect of Orthodontic Bracket Type and Mouthguard Presence on the Stress and Strain during a Frontal Impact.
    Alves JCC; Borges GA; Versluis A; Soares CJ; Veríssimo C
    Braz Dent J; 2020; 31(5):540-547. PubMed ID: 33146339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ceramic bracket design: an analysis using the finite element method.
    Ghosh J; Nanda RS; Duncanson MG; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Dec; 108(6):575-82. PubMed ID: 7503034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of antagonist tooth contact on the biomechanical response of custom-fitted mouthguards.
    Veríssimo C; Bicalho AA; Soares PB; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    Dent Traumatol; 2017 Feb; 33(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 27194626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Custom-Fitted EVA Mouthguards: what is the ideal thickness? a dynamic finite element impact study.
    Verissimo C; Costa PV; Santos-Filho PC; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    Dent Traumatol; 2016 Apr; 32(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 26310199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of ceramic veneer thickness and antagonist on impact stresses during dental trauma with and without a mouthguard assessed with finite element analysis.
    Bragança GF; Vilela ABF; Soares PBF; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    Dent Traumatol; 2021 Apr; 37(2):215-222. PubMed ID: 33217137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forces in the presence of ceramic versus stainless steel brackets with unconventional vs conventional ligatures.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Camporesi M
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 18193950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Torque expression of self-ligating brackets compared with conventional metallic, ceramic, and plastic brackets.
    Morina E; Eliades T; Pandis N; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 18540011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modifying the biomechanical response of mouthguards with hard inserts: A finite element study.
    Verissimo C; Santos-Filho PC; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    Am J Dent; 2015 Apr; 28(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 26087579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microbial profile on metallic and ceramic bracket materials.
    Anhoury P; Nathanson D; Hughes CV; Socransky S; Feres M; Chou LL
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):338-43. PubMed ID: 12169034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Torque differences due to the material variation of the orthodontic appliance: a finite element study.
    Papageorgiou SN; Keilig L; Vandevska-Radunovic V; Eliades T; Bourauel C
    Prog Orthod; 2017 Dec; 18(1):6. PubMed ID: 28164256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of material variation on the biomechanical behaviour of orthodontic fixed appliances: a finite element analysis.
    Papageorgiou SN; Keilig L; Hasan I; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 38(3):300-7. PubMed ID: 26174769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture strengths of ceramic brackets subjected to mesial-distal archwire tipping forces.
    Rhodes RK; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 1554165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of Different Bracket's Resistance to Torsional Forces from Archwire.
    Khanapure CC; Ayesha S; Sam G; Kumar VJ; Deepika C; Ahmed H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):564-7. PubMed ID: 27595723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a dentoalveolar model for testing mouthguards: stress and strain analyses.
    Verissimo C; Costa PV; Santos-Filho PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    Dent Traumatol; 2016 Feb; 32(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 26139006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.
    Ozcan M; Finnema K; Ybema A
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18209212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic brackets.
    Nishio C; da Motta AF; Elias CN; Mucha JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jan; 125(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 14718880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ability of mouthguards to protect veneered teeth: A 3D finite element analysis.
    Dal Piva AMO; Tribst JPM; Borges ALS; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
    Dent Traumatol; 2023 Jun; 39(3):191-199. PubMed ID: 36573913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite element analysis of slot wall deformation in stainless steel and titanium orthodontic brackets during simulated palatal root torque.
    Magesh V; Harikrishnan P; Kingsly Jeba Singh D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):481-488. PubMed ID: 29602339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ceramic bracket fracture resistance to second order arch wire activations.
    Lindauer SJ; Macon CR; Browning H; Rubenstein LK; Isaacson RJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Nov; 106(5):481-6. PubMed ID: 7977188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alternatives to ceramic brackets: the tensile bond strengths of two aesthetic brackets compared ex vivo with stainless steel foil-mesh bracket bases.
    Arici S; Regan D
    Br J Orthod; 1997 May; 24(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 9218111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.