BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33147054)

  • 1. Patient Characteristics Associated With Patient-Reported Deterrents to Adjunct Breast Cancer Screening of Patients With Dense Breasts.
    Miller MM; Repich K; Patrie JT; Anderson RT; Harvey JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Nov; 217(5):1069-1079. PubMed ID: 33147054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors Associated With Breast Cancer Screening Behaviors Among Women With Dense Breasts.
    Miller MM; Ganti R; Repich K; Patrie JT; Anderson RT; Harvey JA
    J Breast Imaging; 2023 Mar; 5(2):125-134. PubMed ID: 38416932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preferences and Attitudes Regarding Adjunct Breast Cancer Screening Among Patients with Dense Breasts.
    Miller MM; Repich K; Patrie JT; Anderson RT; Harvey JA
    J Breast Imaging; 2020 Mar; 2(2):119-124. PubMed ID: 38424895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospective comparative trial of adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts (ASTOUND-2).
    Tagliafico AS; Mariscotti G; Valdora F; Durando M; Nori J; La Forgia D; Rosenberg I; Caumo F; Gandolfo N; Sormani MP; Signori A; Calabrese M; Houssami N
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 104():39-46. PubMed ID: 30316869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors associated with perceived personal risk for breast cancer among women with dense breasts.
    Miller MM; Vasiliadis T; Rochman CM; Repich K; Patrie JT; Anderson RT; Harvey JA
    Clin Imaging; 2023 Jan; 93():34-38. PubMed ID: 36371852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incorporating Baseline Breast Density When Screening Women at Average Risk for Breast Cancer : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Shih YT; Dong W; Xu Y; Etzioni R; Shen Y
    Ann Intern Med; 2021 May; 174(5):602-612. PubMed ID: 33556275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
    Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up.
    Corsetti V; Houssami N; Ghirardi M; Ferrari A; Speziani M; Bellarosa S; Remida G; Gasparotti C; Galligioni E; Ciatto S
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(7):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21211962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of Adjunctive Ultrasonography for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women Aged 40-49 Years With Varying Breast Density Undergoing Screening Mammography: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Harada-Shoji N; Suzuki A; Ishida T; Zheng YF; Narikawa-Shiono Y; Sato-Tadano A; Ohta R; Ohuchi N
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2121505. PubMed ID: 34406400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient preferences regarding use of contrast-enhanced imaging for breast cancer screening.
    Son D; Phillips J; Mehta TS; Mehta R; Brook A; Dialani VM
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S229-S238. PubMed ID: 33846061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does three-dimensional functional infrared imaging improve breast cancer detection based on digital mammography in women with dense breasts?
    Hellgren RJ; Sundbom AE; Czene K; Izhaky D; Hall P; Dickman PW
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Nov; 29(11):6227-6235. PubMed ID: 31115623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The cost-effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis in a population breast cancer screening program.
    Wang J; Phi XA; Greuter MJW; Daszczuk AM; Feenstra TL; Pijnappel RM; Vermeulen KM; Buls N; Houssami N; Lu W; de Bock GH
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5437-5445. PubMed ID: 32382844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital volumetric measurement of mammographic density and the risk of overlooking cancer in Japanese women.
    Sawada T; Akashi S; Nakamura S; Kuwayama T; Enokido K; Yoshida M; Hashimoto R; Ide T; Masuda H; Taruno K; Oyama H; Takamaru T; Kanada Y; Ikeda M; Kosugi N; Sato H; Nakayama S; Ata A; Tonouchi Y; Sakai H; Matsunaga Y; Matsutani A
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Sep; 24(5):708-713. PubMed ID: 28238177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effect of California's Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening.
    Chau SL; Alabaster A; Luikart K; Brenman LM; Habel LA
    J Prim Care Community Health; 2017 Apr; 8(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 27799412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient Experience of Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
    Miller MM; Mayorov S; Ganti R; Nguyen JV; Rochman CM; Caley M; Jahjah J; Repich K; Patrie JT; Anderson RT; Harvey JA; Rooney TB
    J Breast Imaging; 2024 May; 6(3):277-287. PubMed ID: 38537570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in women with dense breasts.
    Jia M; Lin X; Zhou X; Yan H; Chen Y; Liu P; Bao L; Li A; Basu P; Qiao Y; Sankaranarayanan R
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jun; 181(3):589-597. PubMed ID: 32338323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tailoring Breast Cancer Screening Intervals by Breast Density and Risk for Women Aged 50 Years or Older: Collaborative Modeling of Screening Outcomes.
    Trentham-Dietz A; Kerlikowske K; Stout NK; Miglioretti DL; Schechter CB; Ergun MA; van den Broek JJ; Alagoz O; Sprague BL; van Ravesteyn NT; Near AM; Gangnon RE; Hampton JM; Chandler Y; de Koning HJ; Mandelblatt JS; Tosteson AN;
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Nov; 165(10):700-712. PubMed ID: 27548583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.