These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33147538)

  • 1. From simple agents to information sources: Readers' differential processing of story characters as a function of story consistency.
    Saux G; Vibert N; Dampuré J; Burin DI; Britt MA; Rouet JF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jan; 212():103191. PubMed ID: 33147538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Readers' use of source information in text comprehension.
    Braasch JL; Rouet JF; Vibert N; Britt MA
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Apr; 40(3):450-65. PubMed ID: 22086649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conflicting but close: Readers' integration of information sources as a function of their disagreement.
    Saux G; Britt A; Le Bigot L; Vibert N; Burin D; Rouet JF
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jan; 45(1):151-167. PubMed ID: 27531139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Readers' reliance on source credibility in the service of comprehension.
    Sparks JR; Rapp DN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):230-47. PubMed ID: 21244116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial text processing: are estimates of time and distance influenced by the age of characters and readers?
    Pazzaglia F; Iachini T; Meneghetti C
    Psychol Res; 2021 Feb; 85(1):259-267. PubMed ID: 31549251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revising what readers know: updating text representations during narrative comprehension.
    Rapp DN; Kendeou P
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):2019-32. PubMed ID: 18265617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Seeing what they read and hearing what they say: readers' representation of the story characters' world.
    Klin CM; Drumm AM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Apr; 17(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 20382925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Text skimming: the process and effectiveness of foraging through text under time pressure.
    Duggan GB; Payne SJ
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Sep; 15(3):228-42. PubMed ID: 19751073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Readers' experiences of characters' goals and actions.
    Egidi G; Gerrig RJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1322-9. PubMed ID: 17087586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Searching for Judy: how small mysteries affect narrative processes and memory.
    Love J; McKoon G; Gerrig RJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):790-6. PubMed ID: 20438273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Text validation: Overlooking consistency effect discrepancies.
    Singer M; Spear J; Rodrigo-Tamarit M
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Feb; 51(2):437-454. PubMed ID: 35984623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From eye movements to scanpath networks: A method for studying individual differences in expository text reading.
    Ma X; Liu Y; Clariana R; Gu C; Li P
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Feb; 55(2):730-750. PubMed ID: 35445941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does mood influence text processing and comprehension? Evidence from an eye-movement study.
    Scrimin S; Mason L
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2015 Sep; 85(3):387-406. PubMed ID: 26010020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flying to Neverland: How readers tacitly judge norms during comprehension.
    Foy JE; Gerrig RJ
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1250-9. PubMed ID: 24972560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How readers experience characters' decisions.
    Jacovina ME; Gerrig RJ
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Sep; 38(6):753-61. PubMed ID: 20852238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age differences in tracking characters during narrative comprehension.
    Noh SR; Stine-Morrow EA
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):769-78. PubMed ID: 19679857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of context and discrepancy when reading multiple documents.
    Schoor C; Rouet JF; Britt MA
    Read Writ; 2023; 36(5):1111-1143. PubMed ID: 35789786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prior knowledge of character locational stereotypes and representations during text comprehension.
    Kojima T
    Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():277-9. PubMed ID: 26220704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of character-based knowledge in online narrative comprehension: evidence from eye movements and ERPs.
    Filik R; Leuthold H
    Brain Res; 2013 Apr; 1506():94-104. PubMed ID: 23419895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity.
    Sanchez CA; Wiley J
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):344-55. PubMed ID: 16752598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.