250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33148423)
1. Quantitative structure-property relationships for the calculation of the soil adsorption coefficient using machine learning algorithms with calculated chemical properties from open-source software.
Kobayashi Y; Yoshida K
Environ Res; 2021 May; 196():110363. PubMed ID: 33148423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of Soil Adsorption Coefficient in Pesticides Using Physicochemical Properties and Molecular Descriptors by Machine Learning Models.
Kobayashi Y; Uchida T; Yoshida K
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Jul; 39(7):1451-1459. PubMed ID: 32274829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Statistical equivalence of prediction models of the soil sorption coefficient obtained using different log P algorithms.
Olguin CJM; Sampaio SC; Dos Reis RR
Chemosphere; 2017 Oct; 184():498-504. PubMed ID: 28622645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. OPERA models for predicting physicochemical properties and environmental fate endpoints.
Mansouri K; Grulke CM; Judson RS; Williams AJ
J Cheminform; 2018 Mar; 10(1):10. PubMed ID: 29520515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. QSPR modelling of the soil sorption coefficient from training sets of different sizes.
Olguin CJM; Sampaio SC; Dos Reis RR; Remor MB; Olguin CFA
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2019 May; 30(5):299-311. PubMed ID: 30982322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. QSPR models for prediction of the soil sorption coefficient (log KOC) values of 209 polychlorinated trans-azobenzenes (PCt-ABs).
Wilczyńska-Piliszek AJ; Piliszek S; Falandysz J
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2012; 47(3):441-9. PubMed ID: 22320697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conformation-Independent QSPR Approach for the Soil Sorption Coefficient of Heterogeneous Compounds.
Aranda JF; Garro Martinez JC; Castro EA; Duchowicz PR
Int J Mol Sci; 2016 Aug; 17(8):. PubMed ID: 27527144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inclusion of molecular descriptors in predictive models improves pesticide soil-air partitioning estimates.
Islam MN; Huang L; Siciliano SD
Chemosphere; 2020 Jun; 248():126031. PubMed ID: 32032877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mordred: a molecular descriptor calculator.
Moriwaki H; Tian YS; Kawashita N; Takagi T
J Cheminform; 2018 Feb; 10(1):4. PubMed ID: 29411163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of different log P algorithms on the modeling of the soil sorption coefficient of nonionic pesticides.
dos Reis RR; Sampaio SC; de Melo EB
Water Res; 2013 Oct; 47(15):5751-9. PubMed ID: 23886539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative structure-activity relationships for predicting soil-sediment sorption coefficients for organic chemicals.
Doucette WJ
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Aug; 22(8):1771-88. PubMed ID: 12924577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Developing a QSPR Model of Organic Carbon Normalized Sorption Coefficients of Perfluorinated and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances.
Jiang L; Xu Y; Zhang X; Xu B; Xu X; Ma Y
Molecules; 2022 Aug; 27(17):. PubMed ID: 36080379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Study on adsorption behavior of volatile and semivolatile organic vapors to air-dry soils based on QSPR methods.
Liu H; Yao X; Liu M; Hu Z; Fan B
Environ Pollut; 2007 May; 147(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 17240022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. QSPR modeling of soil sorption coefficients (K(OC)) of pesticides using SPA-ANN and SPA-MLR.
Goudarzi N; Goodarzi M; Araujo MC; Galvão RK
J Agric Food Chem; 2009 Aug; 57(15):7153-8. PubMed ID: 19722589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Machine-Learning-Based Prediction of Plant Cuticle-Air Partition Coefficients for Organic Pollutants: Revealing Mechanisms from a Molecular Structure Perspective.
Tao T; Tao C; Zhu T
Molecules; 2024 Mar; 29(6):. PubMed ID: 38543017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Machine learning transition temperatures from 2D structure.
Sifain AE; Rice BM; Yalkowsky SH; Barnes BC
J Mol Graph Model; 2021 Jun; 105():107848. PubMed ID: 33667863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In Silico Prediction of Physicochemical Properties of Environmental Chemicals Using Molecular Fingerprints and Machine Learning.
Zang Q; Mansouri K; Williams AJ; Judson RS; Allen DG; Casey WM; Kleinstreuer NC
J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Jan; 57(1):36-49. PubMed ID: 28006899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Statistical external validation and consensus modeling: a QSPR case study for Koc prediction.
Gramatica P; Giani E; Papa E
J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Mar; 25(6):755-66. PubMed ID: 16890002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Revealing chemophoric sites in organophosphorus insecticides through the MIA-QSPR modeling of soil sorption data.
Daré JK; Silva CF; Freitas MP
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2017 Oct; 144():560-563. PubMed ID: 28688357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of molecular representations for lipophilicity quantitative structure-property relationships with results from the SAMPL6 logP Prediction Challenge.
Lui R; Guan D; Matthews S
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):523-534. PubMed ID: 31933037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
