These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3315090)
1. A set of X-ray test objects for image quality control in digital subtraction fluorography. I: Design considerations. Cowen AR; Haywood JM; Workman A; Clarke OF Br J Radiol; 1987 Oct; 60(718):1001-9. PubMed ID: 3315090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A set of X-ray test objects for image quality control in digital subtraction fluorography. II: Application and interpretation of results. Cowen AR; Workman A; Haywood JM; Clarke OF Br J Radiol; 1987 Oct; 60(718):1011-8. PubMed ID: 3315091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Threshold contrast detail detectability curves for fluoroscopy and digital acquisition using modern image intensifier systems. Evans DS; Mackenzie A; Lawinski CP; Smith D Br J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 77(921):751-8. PubMed ID: 15447961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A review of image quality and dose issues in digital fluorography and digital subtraction angiography. Kotre CJ; Marshall NW Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):73-6. PubMed ID: 11487847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography. Cowen AR; Davies AG; Sivananthan MU Clin Radiol; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1073-85. PubMed ID: 18774353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A set of X-ray test objects for quality control in television fluoroscopy. Hay GA; Clarke OF; Coleman NJ; Cowen AR Br J Radiol; 1985 Apr; 58(688):335-44. PubMed ID: 4063676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A critical overview of acceptance testing using various measured indices. Dowling A; Kenny T; Malone J Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):53-8. PubMed ID: 11487843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of a quality index in threshold contrast detail detection measurements in television fluoroscopy. Gallacher DJ; Mackenzie A; Batchelor S; Lynch J; Saunders JE Br J Radiol; 2003 Jul; 76(907):464-72. PubMed ID: 12857706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subjective and objective measures of image quality in digital fluoroscopy. Walsh C; Dowling A; Meade A; Malone J Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):34-7. PubMed ID: 16461534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A figure of merit for the assessment of image intensifier systems. McRobbie DW; Hancock AP; Castellano IA Br J Radiol; 1992 Oct; 65(778):878-84. PubMed ID: 1422661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The TsFK-1 digital camera for fluorography and roentgenography]. Blinov NN; Borisov AA; Veĭp IuA; Golovastov SA; Mazurov AI; Elinson MB Med Tekh; 1999; (5):30-1. PubMed ID: 10560094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Update on the recommended viewing protocol for FAXIL threshold contrast detail detectability test objects used in television fluoroscopy. Launders JH; McArdle S; Workman A; Cowen AR Br J Radiol; 1995 Jan; 68(805):70-7. PubMed ID: 7881886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Image noise analysis in digital fluorography. Maher KP; Thomson KR Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1988; 11(4):143-6. PubMed ID: 3064743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Methods and devices for low-dose digital fluorography]. Kanter BM Med Tekh; 1999; (5):10-3. PubMed ID: 10560088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality control measurements for fluoroscopy systems in eight countries participating in the SENTINEL EU coordination action. Zoetelief J; Schultz FW; Kottou S; Gray L; O'Connor U; Salat D; Kepler K; Kaplanis P; Jankowski J; Schreiner A; Vassileva J Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):237-43. PubMed ID: 18310607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Relationship of the specifications and informative value of digital X-ray study in pulmonary tuberculosis]. Sadikov PV Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2007; (2):4-9. PubMed ID: 18383617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]