These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33151146)

  • 1. Current Contraceptive Status Among Women Aged 15-49: United States, 2017-2019.
    Daniels K; Abma JC
    NCHS Data Brief; 2020 Oct; (388):1-8. PubMed ID: 33151146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Current contraceptive status among women aged 15-44: United States, 2011-2013.
    Daniels K; Daugherty J; Jones J
    NCHS Data Brief; 2014 Dec; (173):1-8. PubMed ID: 25500343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).
    Black A; Guilbert E; ; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman WV; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; ; Ferguson C; Fortin C; Kielly M; Mansouri S; Todd N;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Oct; 37(10):936-42. PubMed ID: 26606712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postpartum contraception: initiation and effectiveness in a large universal healthcare system.
    Brunson MR; Klein DA; Olsen CH; Weir LF; Roberts TA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):55.e1-55.e9. PubMed ID: 28257962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of contraception in the United States: 1982-2008.
    Mosher WD; Jones J
    Vital Health Stat 23; 2010 Aug; (29):1-44. PubMed ID: 20939159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in the Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods Among U.S. Nulliparous Women: Results from the 2006-2010, 2011-2013, and 2013-2015 National Survey of Family Growth.
    Ihongbe TO; Masho SW
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2018 Mar; 27(3):245-252. PubMed ID: 29148890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current Contraceptive Use and Variation by Selected Characteristics Among Women Aged 15-44: United States, 2011-2013.
    Daniels K; Daugherty J; Jones J; Mosher W
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2015 Nov; (86):1-14. PubMed ID: 26556545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contraceptive use in Australia: evidence from the 1995 National Health Survey.
    Yusuf F; Siedlecky S
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Feb; 39(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 10099752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contraceptive practices and trends in France.
    Toulemon L; Leridon H
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(3):114-20. PubMed ID: 9635259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).
    Black A; Guilbert E; ; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman WV; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; ; Ferguson C; Fortin C; Kielly M; Mansouri S; Todd N
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Nov; 37(11):1033-9. PubMed ID: 26629725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Initiation and continuation of long-acting reversible contraception in the United States military healthcare system.
    Chiles DP; Roberts TA; Klein DA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 215(3):328.e1-9. PubMed ID: 27005514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characteristics of women in the United States who use long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.
    Kavanaugh ML; Jerman J; Hubacher D; Kost K; Finer LB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 117(6):1349-1357. PubMed ID: 21606745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contraception after delivery and short interpregnancy intervals among women in the United States.
    White K; Teal SB; Potter JE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 125(6):1471-1477. PubMed ID: 26000519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The contraceptive practices of women seeking termination of pregnancy in an Auckland clinic.
    Young LK; Farquhar CM; McCowan LM; Roberts HE; Taylor J
    N Z Med J; 1994 May; 107(978):189-92. PubMed ID: 8196861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-acting reversible contraception.
    Peck SA
    Nurs Womens Health; 2013 Oct; 17(5):431-5. PubMed ID: 24138662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contraceptive use, pregnancy and fertility patterns among single American women in their 20s.
    Tanfer K; Horn MC
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1985; 17(1):10-9. PubMed ID: 3979524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Obesity and contraceptive use among women 20-44years of age in the United States: results from the 2011-15 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG).
    Mosher WD; Lantos H; Burke AE
    Contraception; 2018 May; 97(5):392-398. PubMed ID: 29221939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Choice of contraceptive modality by women in Norway.
    Skjeldestad FE
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1994 Jan; 73(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 8304025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrospective analysis of the impact of increasing access to long acting reversible contraceptives in a commercially insured population.
    Law A; Pilon D; Lynen R; Laliberté F; Gozalo L; Lefebvre P; Duh MS
    Reprod Health; 2016 Aug; 13(1):96. PubMed ID: 27549429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contraceptive use and the need for family planning in Puerto Rico.
    Herold JM; Warren CW; Smith JC; Rochat RW; Martinez R; Vera M
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1986; 18(4):185-8, 190-2. PubMed ID: 3792531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.