127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33151466)
1. Visualization of blurring process due to analog components in a digital radiography system using a simple method.
Maruyama S
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2020 Dec; 43(4):1461-1468. PubMed ID: 33151466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigation of image lag and modulation transfer function in fluoroscopy images obtained with a dynamic flat-panel detector.
Kawashima H; Tanaka R; Ichikawa K; Matsubara K; Iida H; Sanada S
Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jul; 6(2):367-74. PubMed ID: 23568338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
Boyce SJ; Samei E
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is the image quality of conventional chest radiography obtained from a two-layer flat panel detector affected by the internal structure of the detector?
Takarabe S; Kuramoto T; Shibayama Y; Yamasaki Y; Kitamura Y; Yoshikawa H; Kato T
Phys Med; 2022 Mar; 95():176-181. PubMed ID: 35219067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of noise characteristics of direct and indirect conversion flat panel detectors].
Murai M; Kishimoto K; Tanaka K; Oota K; Ienaga A
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Nov; 66(11):1443-8. PubMed ID: 21099174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. NPWE model observer as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis of digital detectors in general radiography.
Van Peteghem N; Bosmans H; Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(21):N575-N591. PubMed ID: 27754987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Full-field digital mammography with amorphous silicon-based flat- panel detector: physical imaging characteristics and signal detection].
Ideguchi T; Higashida Y; Himuro K; Ohki M; Nakamura S; Yoshida A; Takagi R; Hatano H; Kuwahara R; Toyonaga M; Tanaka I; Toyofuku F
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Mar; 60(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 15131510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of different commercial FFDM units by means of physical characterization and contrast-detail analysis.
Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Campanini R; Bertolini M; Borasi G; Nitrosi A; Danielli C; Angelini L; Maggi S
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4198-209. PubMed ID: 17153399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Investigation of image quality identification utilizing physical image quality measurement in direct- and indirect-type of flat panel detectors and computed radiography].
Yokoi T; Takata T; Ichikawa K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1415-25. PubMed ID: 22104233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.
Kuhls-Gilcrist A; Jain A; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR; Rudin S
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):724-35. PubMed ID: 20229882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.
Marshall NW; Monnin P; Bosmans H; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4201-20. PubMed ID: 21701051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simulation system for understanding the lag effect in fluoroscopic images.
Tanaka R; Kawashima H; Ichikawa K; Matsubara K; Iida H; Sanada S
Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jul; 6(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 23271447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography.
Floyd CE; Warp RJ; Dobbins JT; Chotas HG; Baydush AH; Vargas-Voracek R; Ravin CE
Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 11230640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Amorphous selenium flat panel detectors for digital mammography: validation of a NPWE model observer with CDMAM observer performance experiments.
Segui JA; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3711-22. PubMed ID: 17089837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Canon's flat-panel detector].
Matsumoto M; Sumida I; Ideguchi T; Kawaji Y; Himuro K
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):232-45. PubMed ID: 12766269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physical and psychophysical characterization of a novel clinical system for digital mammography.
Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Bertolini M; Borasi G; Golinelli P; Acchiappati D; Gallo E
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5139-48. PubMed ID: 19994524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Flat-panel detectors in X-ray systems].
Spahn M; Heer V; Freytag R
Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):340-50. PubMed ID: 12764582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Image quality and detection performance of a direct digital radiography system].
Ideguchi T; Matsuda K; Himuro K; Kuwahara R; Miyazaki H; Hazeyama H; Kumazawa S; Kawaji Y; Yoshida A; Matsumoto M; Higashida Y
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 Mar; 62(3):425-33. PubMed ID: 16604048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
