244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33151511)
1. Feasibility of morphological assessment of coronary artery calcification with electrocardiography-gated non-contrast computed tomography: a comparative study with optical coherence tomography.
Takahashi Y; Toba T; Otake H; Fukuyama Y; Nakano S; Matsuoka Y; Tanimura K; Izawa Y; Kawamori H; Kono AK; Fujiwara S; Hirata KI
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Apr; 37(4):1445-1453. PubMed ID: 33151511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantification of calcium burden by coronary CT angiography compared to optical coherence tomography.
Monizzi G; Sonck J; Nagumo S; Buytaert D; Van Hoe L; Grancini L; Bartorelli AL; Vanhoenacker P; Simons P; Bladt O; Wyffels E; De Bruyne B; Andreini D; Collet C
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Dec; 36(12):2393-2402. PubMed ID: 33205340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In Vivo Calcium Detection by Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Angiography.
Wang X; Matsumura M; Mintz GS; Lee T; Zhang W; Cao Y; Fujino A; Lin Y; Usui E; Kanaji Y; Murai T; Yonetsu T; Kakuta T; Maehara A
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Aug; 10(8):869-879. PubMed ID: 28797408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation of cardiovascular risk on routine chest CT: Ordinal coronary artery calcium scoring as an accurate predictor of Agatston score ranges.
Azour L; Kadoch MA; Ward TJ; Eber CD; Jacobi AH
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 27743881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Calcium evaluation using coronary computed tomography in combination with optical coherence tomography.
Kurogi K; Ishii M; Ikebe S; Kaichi R; Takae M; Mori T; Komaki S; Yamamoto N; Tsujita K
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Sep; 39(9):1815-1824. PubMed ID: 37289332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optical coherence tomography-derived predictors of stent expansion in calcified lesions.
Ziedses des Plantes AC; Scoccia A; Neleman T; Groenland FTW; van Zandvoort LJC; Ligthart JMR; Witberg KT; Liu S; Boersma E; Nuis RJ; den Dekker WK; Wilschut J; Diletti R; Zijlstra F; Van Mieghem NM; Daemen J
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Jul; 102(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 37210611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability analysis of visual ranking of coronary artery calcification on low-dose CT of the thorax for lung cancer screening: comparison with ECG-gated calcium scoring CT.
Kim YK; Sung YM; Cho SH; Park YN; Choi HY
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Dec; 30 Suppl 2():81-7. PubMed ID: 25084979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo coronary lesion differentiation with computed tomography angiography and intravascular ultrasound as compared to optical coherence tomography.
Wieringa WG; Lexis CP; Lipsic E; van der Werf HW; Burgerhof JG; Hagens VE; Bartels GL; Broersen A; Schurer RA; Tan ES; van der Harst P; van den Heuvel AF; Willems TP; Pundziute G
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(2):111-118. PubMed ID: 28169175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Regional calcified plaque score evaluated by multidetector computed tomography for predicting the addition of rotational atherectomy during percutaneous coronary intervention.
Sekimoto T; Akutsu Y; Hamazaki Y; Sakai K; Kosaki R; Yokota H; Tsujita H; Tsukamoto S; Kaneko K; Sakurai M; Kodama Y; Li HL; Sambe T; Oguchi K; Uchida N; Kobayashi S; Aoki A; Gokan T; Kobayashi Y
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):221-8. PubMed ID: 26811266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-pitch dual-source CT for coronary artery calcium scoring: A head-to-head comparison of non-triggered chest versus triggered cardiac acquisition.
Xia C; Vonder M; Pelgrim GJ; Rook M; Xie X; Alsurayhi A; van Ooijen PMA; van Bolhuis JN; Oudkerk M; Dorrius M; van der Harst P; Vliegenthart R
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2021; 15(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 32505593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a Deep Learning-Based Automated CT Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Algorithm.
Martin SS; van Assen M; Rapaka S; Hudson HT; Fischer AM; Varga-Szemes A; Sahbaee P; Schwemmer C; Gulsun MA; Cimen S; Sharma P; Vogl TJ; Schoepf UJ
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Feb; 13(2 Pt 1):524-526. PubMed ID: 31734200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fighting calcification with optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention. Commentary on the optical coherence tomography-derived predictors of stent expansion in calcified lesions.
Sonoda S; Node K
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Aug; 102(2):394-395. PubMed ID: 37471715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors of side branch compromise in calcified bifurcation lesions treated with orbital atherectomy.
Barman N; Okamoto N; Ueda H; Chamaria S; Bhatheja S; Vengrenyuk Y; Gupta E; Sweeny J; Kapur V; Hasan C; Baber U; Moreno P; Sharma S; Kini AS
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul; 94(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 30511359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chronic stent recoil in severely calcified coronary artery lesions. A serial optical coherence tomography study.
Amemiya K; Maehara A; Yamamoto MH; Oyama Y; Igawa W; Ono M; Kido T; Ebara S; Okabe T; Yamashita K; Isomura N; Mintz GS; Ochiai M
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Sep; 36(9):1617-1626. PubMed ID: 32462449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optical Coherence Tomography Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Plaque Rupture, Erosion, and Calcified Nodule in Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Khalifa AKM; Kubo T; Ino Y; Terada K; Emori H; Higashioka D; Katayama Y; Takahata M; Shimamura K; Shiono Y; Matsuo Y; Tanaka A; Hozumi T; Akasaka T
Circ J; 2020 May; 84(6):911-916. PubMed ID: 32307358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Calcification remodeling index assessed by cardiac CT predicts severe coronary stenosis in lesions with moderate to severe calcification.
Yu M; Li Y; Li W; Lu Z; Wei M; Zhang J
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 28988831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Accuracy of 320-Row Computed Tomography for Characterizing Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques: Comparison with Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography.
Ybarra LF; Szarf G; Ishikawa W; Chamié D; Caixeta A; Puri R; Perin MA
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 May; 21(5):640-646. PubMed ID: 31501019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Combined Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound Study on Plaque Rupture, Plaque Erosion, and Calcified Nodule in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Incidence, Morphologic Characteristics, and Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Higuma T; Soeda T; Abe N; Yamada M; Yokoyama H; Shibutani S; Vergallo R; Minami Y; Ong DS; Lee H; Okumura K; Jang IK
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 8(9):1166-1176. PubMed ID: 26117464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for predicting in-stent restenosis.
Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Vliegenthart R; Duguay TM; Stubenrauch AC; Rosenberg RD; Varga-Szemes A; Bayer RR; Yang J; Ebersberger U; Baquet M; Jochheim D; Hoffmann E; Steinberg DH; Chiaramida SA; Schoepf UJ
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(5):377-83. PubMed ID: 27431607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility and diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve measurement derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in real clinical practice.
Kawaji T; Shiomi H; Morishita H; Morimoto T; Taylor CA; Kanao S; Koizumi K; Kozawa S; Morihiro K; Watanabe H; Tazaki J; Imai M; Saito N; Shizuta S; Ono K; Togashi K; Kimura T
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 27718139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
