These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33152329)

  • 1. Three-Field Lymphadenectomy in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
    Song WA; Fan BS; Di SY; Liu JQ; Zhao JH; Chen SY; Yue CY; Zhou SH; Gong TQ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2021 Sep; 112(3):928-934. PubMed ID: 33152329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-Field Versus Two-Field Lymphadenectomy in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: 3-Year Survival Outcomes of a Randomized Trial.
    Fan B; Sun Z; Lu J; Liu J; Zhao J; Zhou S; Di S; Song W; Gong T
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Oct; 30(11):6730-6736. PubMed ID: 37358684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lymph node dissection in esophageal carcinoma: Minimally invasive esophagectomy vs open surgery.
    Ye B; Zhong CX; Yang Y; Fang WT; Mao T; Ji CY; Li ZG
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 22(19):4750-6. PubMed ID: 27217706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial).
    Tagkalos E; van der Sluis PC; Berlth F; Poplawski A; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Müller-Stich BP; Ruurda JP; Schiesser M; Schneider PM; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Sep; 21(1):1060. PubMed ID: 34565343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Efficacy comparison between two-field and three-field lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].
    Lin D; Ye T; Ma L; Shao L; Song Z; Jiang S; Xiang J
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):990-994. PubMed ID: 27680065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy is safe and feasible for treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Ma S; Yan T; Liu D; Wang K; Wang J; Song J; Wang T; He W; Bai J; Jin L; Chen X
    Thorac Cancer; 2018 Feb; 9(2):310-315. PubMed ID: 29319236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
    Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.
    Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
    Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extensive mediastinal lymphadenectomy during minimally invasive esophagectomy: optimal results from a single center.
    Shen Y; Zhang Y; Tan L; Feng M; Wang H; Khan MA; Liang M; Wang Q
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 Apr; 16(4):715-21. PubMed ID: 22258878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
    Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.
    Morimoto Y; Kawakubo H; Ishikawa A; Matsuda S; Hijikata N; Ando M; Mayanagi S; Irino T; Nakamura R; Wada N; Tsuji T; Kitagawa Y
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Apr; 15(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 34637190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
    Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perioperative outcomes of single-port mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer.
    Fujiwara H; Shiozaki A; Konishi H; Kosuga T; Komatsu S; Ichikawa D; Okamoto K; Otsuji E
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Oct; 30(10):1-8. PubMed ID: 28859387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of short-term outcomes between 2- and 3-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer.
    Yamashita K; Makino T; Yamasaki M; Tanaka K; Hara T; Miyazaki Y; Takahashi T; Kurokawa Y; Nakajima K; Takiguchi S; Mori M; Doki Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Nov; 30(11):1-8. PubMed ID: 28881906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Ivor-Lewis vs Sweet esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial.
    Li B; Xiang J; Zhang Y; Li H; Zhang J; Sun Y; Hu H; Miao L; Ma L; Luo X; Chen S; Ye T; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Chen H
    JAMA Surg; 2015 Apr; 150(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 25650816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of a tailored surgical technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Javidfar J; Bacchetta M; Yang JA; Miller J; D'Ovidio F; Ginsburg ME; Gorenstein LA; Bessler M; Sonett JR
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1125-9. PubMed ID: 22500593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study of three types of lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Zhang S; Zhang P; Guo S; Lian J; Chen Y; Chen A; Ma Y; Li F
    Thorac Cancer; 2020 Feb; 11(2):224-231. PubMed ID: 31860783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Lymphatic metastasis intensity of and lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].
    Lu ZM; Zhang H; Wang MH; Cui DH; Yang YQ; Huang HZ
    Ai Zheng; 2006 May; 25(5):604-8. PubMed ID: 16687083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.