168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33152577)
1. Patient-reported outcome measures in external and endonasal functional septorhinoplasty - A propensity score matching study.
Gostian M; Stange T; Wurm J; Gostian AO
Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(1):102763. PubMed ID: 33152577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pain after External and Endonasal Septorhinoplasty-A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Gostian M; Loeser J; Heindl L; Gostian AO
Facial Plast Surg; 2020 Jun; 36(3):290-296. PubMed ID: 32512602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of Patient Satisfaction With Evaluation Methods in Open Technique Septorhinoplasty.
Başer E; Kocagöz GD; Çalim ÖF; Verim A; Yilmaz F; Özturan O
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):420-4. PubMed ID: 26967078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Functional and aesthetic results after septorhinoplasty and concomitant radiofrequency of the inferior turbinate: is there a role for patient reported outcome measures (PROMs)?
Parrilla C; Salvati A; Mastrapasqua RF; Artuso A; Paludetti G; Galli J
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 276(3):745-751. PubMed ID: 30604059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benefits of a short, practical questionnaire to measure subjective perception of nasal appearance after aesthetic rhinoplasty.
Lohuis PJFM; Hakim S; Duivesteijn W; Knobbe A; Tasman AJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Dec; 132(6):913e-923e. PubMed ID: 24281638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of septorhinoplasty: a new approach comparing functional and aesthetic results.
Radulesco T; Penicaud M; Santini L; Thomassin JM; Dessi P; Michel J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 47(2):175-179. PubMed ID: 28967532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Endonasal and External Septoplasty for Treatment of Buckled Caudal Septal Deviation.
Awan NU; Azeem M; Cheema KM
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2021 Jan; 31(1):51-54. PubMed ID: 33546533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improvement in nasal obstruction and quality of life after septorhinoplasty and turbinate surgery.
Yamasaki A; Levesque PA; Bleier BS; Busaba NY; Gray ST; Holbrook EH; Sedaghat AR; Lindsay RW
Laryngoscope; 2019 Jul; 129(7):1554-1560. PubMed ID: 30810237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of the EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire for Detection of Clinically Significant Global Health-Related Quality-of-Life Improvement Following Functional Septorhinoplasty.
Fuller JC; Levesque PA; Lindsay RW
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 27893020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient satisfaction in Caucasian and Mediterranean open rhinoplasty using the tongue-in-groove technique: prospective statistical analysis of change in subjective body image in relation to nasal appearance following aesthetic rhinoplasty.
Lohuis PJ; Datema FR
Laryngoscope; 2015 Apr; 125(4):831-6. PubMed ID: 25389075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The need for an objective measure in septorhinoplasty surgery: are we any closer to finding an answer?
Andrews PJ; Choudhury N; Takhar A; Poirrier AL; Jacques T; Randhawa PS
Clin Otolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 40(6):698-703. PubMed ID: 25943502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Visual Analog Scale as a Comprehensible Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) in Septorhinoplasty.
Spiekermann C; Amler S; Rudack C; Stenner M
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Jun; 42(3):859-866. PubMed ID: 29500606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Examining Preoperative Expectations and Postoperative Satisfaction in Rhinoplasty Patients: A Single-Center Study.
Kandathil CK; Patel PN; Spataro EA; Most SP
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2021 Sep; 23(5):375-382. PubMed ID: 33337943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The MiRa scale, a new standardised scale for evaluating nasal deformities before and after septorhinoplasty: A prospective study comparing patient satisfaction and the surgeon's assessment.
Radulesco T; Penicaud M; Santini L; Thomassin JM; Dessi P; Michel J
Clin Otolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 42(6):1350-1357. PubMed ID: 28374943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of aesthetic and functional outcomes in rhinoplasty surgery: a prospective study.
Sena Esteves S; Gonçalves Ferreira M; Carvalho Almeida J; Abrunhosa J; Almeida E Sousa C
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2017; 83(5):552-557. PubMed ID: 27470497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Split hump technique for reduction of the overprojected nasal dorsum: a statistical analysis on subjective body image in relation to nasal appearance and nasal patency in 97 patients undergoing aesthetic rhinoplasty.
Lohuis PJ; Faraj-Hakim S; Knobbe A; Duivesteijn W; Bran GM
Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2012; 14(5):346-53. PubMed ID: 22986942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptions and satisfaction of aesthetic outcome following secondary cleft rhinoplasty: evaluation by patients versus health professionals.
Byrne M; Chan JC; O'Broin E
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1062-70. PubMed ID: 24581635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spare roof technique in reduction rhinoplasty: Prospective study of the first one hundred patients.
Santos M; Rego ÂR; Coutinho M; Sousa CAE; Ferreira MG
Laryngoscope; 2019 Dec; 129(12):2702-2706. PubMed ID: 30628092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient-reported outcomes after endonasal rhinoplasty for the long nose.
Cingi C; Toros SZ; Cakli H; Gürbüz MK
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):1002-6. PubMed ID: 23714933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the rhinoplasty outcome: inter-rater variability of aesthetic perception in the light of objective facial analysis.
Ozturk K; Gode S; Karahan C; Midilli R
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 272(12):3709-13. PubMed ID: 25563240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
