BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33152613)

  • 1. A comparison of centre of pressure behaviour and ground reaction force magnitudes when individuals walk overground and on an instrumented treadmill.
    Hutchinson LA; De Asha AR; Rainbow MJ; Dickinson AWL; Deluzio KJ
    Gait Posture; 2021 Jan; 83():174-176. PubMed ID: 33152613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects.
    Riley PO; Paolini G; Della Croce U; Paylo KW; Kerrigan DC
    Gait Posture; 2007 Jun; 26(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 16905322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Joint kinematics and ground reaction forces in overground versus treadmill graded running.
    Firminger CR; Vernillo G; Savoldelli A; Stefanyshyn DJ; Millet GY; Edwards WB
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jun; 63():109-113. PubMed ID: 29729612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill walking.
    White SC; Yack HJ; Tucker CA; Lin HY
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1998 Oct; 30(10):1537-42. PubMed ID: 9789855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of load carriage on joint kinematics, vertical ground reaction force and muscle activity: Treadmill versus overground walking.
    Künzler M; Herger S; De Pieri E; Egloff C; Mündermann A; Nüesch C
    Gait Posture; 2023 Jul; 104():1-8. PubMed ID: 37263066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of sagittal plane gait characteristics between the overground and treadmill approach for gait analysis in typically developing children.
    Senden R; Marcellis R; Meijer K; Willems P; Lenssen T; Staal H; Janssen Y; Groen V; Vermeulen RJ; Witlox M
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13752. PubMed ID: 35898943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is treadmill walking biomechanically comparable to overground walking? A systematic review.
    Semaan MB; Wallard L; Ruiz V; Gillet C; Leteneur S; Simoneau-Buessinger E
    Gait Posture; 2022 Feb; 92():249-257. PubMed ID: 34890914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of variability in spatiotemporal gait parameters between treadmill and overground walking conditions.
    Hollman JH; Watkins MK; Imhoff AC; Braun CE; Akervik KA; Ness DK
    Gait Posture; 2016 Jan; 43():204-9. PubMed ID: 26481257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability and minimum detectable change of measures of gait in children during walking and running on an instrumented treadmill.
    McSweeney SC; Reed LF; Wearing SC
    Gait Posture; 2020 Jan; 75():105-108. PubMed ID: 31648119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of direction and speed on treadmill walking in typically developing children.
    Henderson G; Ferreira D; Wu J
    Gait Posture; 2021 Feb; 84():169-174. PubMed ID: 33341463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterization of speed adaptation while walking on an omnidirectional treadmill.
    Soni S; Lamontagne A
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Nov; 17(1):153. PubMed ID: 33228761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treadmill vs. overground trotting - a comparison of two kinetic measurement systems.
    Söhnel K; Fischer MS; Häusler K
    Res Vet Sci; 2022 Dec; 150():149-155. PubMed ID: 35841723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treadmill vs. overground running gait during childhood: a qualitative and quantitative analysis.
    Rozumalski A; Novacheck TF; Griffith CJ; Walt K; Schwartz MH
    Gait Posture; 2015 Feb; 41(2):613-8. PubMed ID: 25662042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of three kinematic gait event detection methods during overground and treadmill walking for individuals post stroke.
    French MA; Koller C; Arch ES
    J Biomech; 2020 Jan; 99():109481. PubMed ID: 31718818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treadmill walking and overground walking of human subjects compared by recording sole-floor reaction force.
    Warabi T; Kato M; Kiriyama K; Yoshida T; Kobayashi N
    Neurosci Res; 2005 Nov; 53(3):343-8. PubMed ID: 16182398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of gait biomechanics and metabolic requirements of overground and treadmill walking in people with stroke.
    Brouwer B; Parvataneni K; Olney SJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Nov; 24(9):729-34. PubMed ID: 19664866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Treadmill and Overground Walking in Children and Adolescents.
    Jung T; Kim Y; Kelly LE; Wagatsuma M; Jung Y; Abel MF
    Percept Mot Skills; 2021 Jun; 128(3):988-1001. PubMed ID: 33567988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing spatiotemporal gait parameters between overground walking and self-paced treadmill walking in persons after stroke.
    Van Bladel A; De Ridder R; Palmans T; Van der Looven R; Cambier D
    Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Mar; 45(6):1016-1021. PubMed ID: 35332811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acute kinematic and neurophysiological effects of treadmill and overground walking in Parkinson's disease.
    Fernández-Lago H; Bello O; Salgado AV; Fernandez-Del-Olmo M
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2019; 44(3):433-443. PubMed ID: 31177243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill running. A validation study.
    Kluitenberg B; Bredeweg SW; Zijlstra S; Zijlstra W; Buist I
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 Nov; 13():235. PubMed ID: 23186326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.