These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33152972)

  • 1. The accuracy of standard audiometric hearing level thresholds in pediatric patients.
    Al Afif A; Comeau M; Aiken S; Hong P
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Nov; 138():110381. PubMed ID: 33152972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Verification of in situ thresholds and integrated real-ear measurements.
    Digiovanni JJ; Pratt RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(10):663-70. PubMed ID: 21376007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact on hearing aid targets of measuring thresholds in dB HL versus dB SPL.
    Saunders GH; Morgan DE
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Sep; 42(6):319-26. PubMed ID: 14570239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the Repeatability and Accuracy of the Wideband Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference.
    Vaisberg JM; Folkeard P; Pumford J; Narten P; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jun; 29(6):520-532. PubMed ID: 29863466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stability of Audiometric Thresholds for Children with Hearing Aids Applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Implications for Safety.
    McCreery R; Walker E; Spratford M; Kirby B; Oleson J; Brennan M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):252-263. PubMed ID: 26967365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Air-Conducted Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: Thresholds, Frequency Tuning, and Effects of Sound Exposure.
    Rodriguez AI; Thomas MLA; Janky KL
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):192-203. PubMed ID: 29870520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting the degree of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.
    Baldwin M; Watkin P
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 23340456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Some observations on the nature of the audiometric 4000 hz notch: data from 3430 veterans.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Jan; 22(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 21419067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Speed and Accuracy of Next-Generation Auditory Steady State Response and Auditory Brainstem Response Audiometry in Children With Normal Hearing and Hearing Loss.
    Sininger YS; Hunter LL; Hayes D; Roush PA; Uhler KM
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1207-1223. PubMed ID: 29624540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of conventional and in-situ audiometry on participants with varying levels of sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kiessling J; Leifholz M; Unkel S; Pons-Kühnemann J; Jespersen CT; Pedersen JN
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 25597462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extended High-Frequency Smartphone Audiometry: Validity and Reliability.
    Bornman M; Swanepoel W; De Jager LB; Eikelboom RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 30461416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revised estimate of minimum audible pressure: where is the "missing 6 dB"?
    Killion MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 May; 63(5):1501-8. PubMed ID: 690329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):478-87. PubMed ID: 15599194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of tubing length and coupling method on hearing threshold and real-ear to coupler difference measures.
    Gustafson S; Pittman A; Fanning R
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):190-9. PubMed ID: 23800818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability in Hearing Threshold Prediction in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Participants Using Mixed Multiple ASSR.
    Israelsson KE; Bogo R; Berninger E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):299-310. PubMed ID: 25751697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of age and degree of hearing loss on the agreement and correlation between sound field audiometric thresholds and tone burst auditory brainstem response thresholds in infants and young children.
    Lee CY; Jaw FS; Pan SL; Hsieh TH; Hsu CJ
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2008 Nov; 107(11):869-75. PubMed ID: 18971156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.