These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33153407)

  • 1. Deference and decision-making in science and society: How deference to scientific authority goes beyond confidence in science and scientists to become authoritarianism.
    Howell EL; Wirz CD; Scheufele DA; Brossard D; Xenos MA
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Nov; 29(8):800-818. PubMed ID: 33153407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trust/distrust judgments and perceptions of climate science: A research note on skeptics' rationalizations.
    Sarathchandra D; Haltinner K
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Jan; 29(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 31691642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation.
    Bertuol-Garcia D; Morsello C; N El-Hani C; Pardini R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2018 May; 93(2):1032-1055. PubMed ID: 29160024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The dark side of belief in Covid-19 scientists and scientific evidence.
    Graso M; Henwood A; Aquino K; Dolan P; Chen FX
    Pers Individ Dif; 2022 Jul; 193():111594. PubMed ID: 35291670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Making sense of policy choices: understanding the roles of value predispositions, mass media, and cognitive processing in public attitudes toward nanotechnology.
    Ho SS; Scheufele DA; Corley EA
    J Nanopart Res; 2010 Oct; 12(8):2703-2715. PubMed ID: 21170125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining expertise: Synthetic biology experts' perceptions of risk, benefit, and the public for research and applications regulation.
    Wirz CD; Howell EL; Scheufele DA; Brossard D; Xenos MA
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Oct; 32(7):870-888. PubMed ID: 37204058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Introduction: Scientific Authority and the Politics of Science and History in Central, Eastern, and Southeastern Europe*.
    Cain F; Hüchtker D; Kleeberg B; Reichenbach K; Surman J
    Ber Wiss; 2021 Dec; 44(4):339-351. PubMed ID: 34874070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The positive association of education with the trust in science and scientists is weaker in highly corrupt countries.
    Alper S; Yelbuz BE; Akkurt SB; Yilmaz O
    Public Underst Sci; 2024 Jan; 33(1):2-19. PubMed ID: 37306012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using Normative Language When Describing Scientific Findings: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial of Effects on Trust and Credibility.
    Agley J; Xiao Y; Thompson EE; Golzarri-Arroyo L
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2022 Sep; 11(9):e41747. PubMed ID: 36044639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contesting epistemic authority: Conspiracy theories on the boundaries of science.
    Harambam J; Aupers S
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 May; 24(4):466-80. PubMed ID: 25452381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scientists and religious leaders compete for cultural authority of science.
    Scheitle CP; Johnson DR; Ecklund EH
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 Jan; 27(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 28699837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Asserting scientific authority. Cognitive development and adolescent legal rights.
    Gardner W; Scherer D; Tester M
    Am Psychol; 1989 Jun; 44(6):895-902. PubMed ID: 2751154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Science-utility and science-trust associations and how they relate to knowledge about how science works.
    Schoor C; Schütz A
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0260586. PubMed ID: 34914732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientists, presidents, and pandemics-comparing the science-politics nexus during the Zika virus and COVID-19 outbreaks.
    Safford TG; Whitmore EH; Hamilton LC
    Soc Sci Q; 2021 Nov; 102(6):2482-2498. PubMed ID: 34908603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Problem of Trust Without Intimacy: Education for Handling Expert Knowledge in a Neoliberal Marketplace.
    Smith DV
    Sci Educ (Dordr); 2022; 31(6):1449-1474. PubMed ID: 35250177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "The best and most practical philosophers": Seamen and the authority of experience in early modern science.
    Hellawell P
    Hist Sci; 2020 Mar; 58(1):28-50. PubMed ID: 31264461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trust: The Need for Public Understanding of How Science Works.
    Solomon M
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2021 Jan; 51 Suppl 1():S36-S39. PubMed ID: 33630343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 'Follow the science': Popular trust in scientific experts during the coronavirus pandemic.
    Seyd B; Hamm JA; Jennings W; McKay L; Valgarðsson V; Anness M
    Public Underst Sci; 2024 Jun; ():9636625241253968. PubMed ID: 38863414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conspiracy beliefs in Britain and North Macedonia: A comparative study.
    Stojanov A; Douglas K
    Int J Psychol; 2022 Apr; 57(2):209-217. PubMed ID: 34423441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Economic advice as a vocation: symbioses of scientific and political authority.
    Davies W
    Br J Sociol; 2011 Jun; 62(2):304-23. PubMed ID: 21631460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.