BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33154787)

  • 1. Prediction of stevia liking by sucrose liking: Effects of beverage background.
    Oleson S; Murphy C
    Chemosens Percept; 2017 Sep; 10(3):49-59. PubMed ID: 33154787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sweet liker status in children and adults: Consequences for beverage intake in adults.
    Garneau NL; Nuessle TM; Mendelsberg BJ; Shepard S; Tucker RM
    Food Qual Prefer; 2018 Apr; 65():175-180. PubMed ID: 31320785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing body composition between the sweet-liking phenotypes: experimental data, systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.
    Armitage RM; Iatridi V; Sladekova M; Yeomans MR
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2024 Jun; 48(6):764-777. PubMed ID: 38467727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in temporal sensory profile, liking, satiety, and postconsumption attributes of yogurt with natural sweeteners.
    Chadha D; Hamid N; Kantono K; Marsan M
    J Food Sci; 2022 Jul; 87(7):3190-3206. PubMed ID: 35708195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifying and Characterizing Subpopulations of Heavy Alcohol Drinkers Via a Sucrose Preference Test: A Sweet Road to a Better Phenotypic Characterization?
    Bouhlal S; Farokhnia M; Lee MR; Akhlaghi F; Leggio L
    Alcohol Alcohol; 2018 Sep; 53(5):560-569. PubMed ID: 30016385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hedonic and sensory characteristics of odors conditioned by pairing with tastants in humans.
    Yeomans MR; Mobini S; Elliman TD; Walker HC; Stevenson RJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):215-28. PubMed ID: 16834490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of acute consumption of beverages containing plant-based or alternative sweetener blends on postprandial appetite, food intake, metabolism, and gastro-intestinal symptoms: Results of the SWEET beverages trial.
    Almiron-Roig E; Navas-Carretero S; Castelnuovo G; Kjølbæk L; Romo-Hualde A; Normand M; Maloney N; Hardman CA; Hodgkins CE; Moshoyiannis H; Finlayson G; Scott C; Raats MM; Harrold JA; Raben A; Halford JCG; Martínez JA
    Appetite; 2023 May; 184():106515. PubMed ID: 36849009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intensity and pleasantness of sucrose taste in patients with winter depression.
    Swiecicki L; Scinska A; Bzinkowska D; Torbinski J; Sienkiewicz-Jarosz H; Samochowiec J; Bienkowski P
    Nutr Neurosci; 2015 May; 18(4):186-91. PubMed ID: 24628084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sweet taste pleasantness is modulated by morphine and naltrexone.
    Eikemo M; Løseth GE; Johnstone T; Gjerstad J; Willoch F; Leknes S
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2016 Oct; 233(21-22):3711-3723. PubMed ID: 27538675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of frequency of consumption of artificial sweeteners on sweetness liking by women.
    Mahar A; Duizer LM
    J Food Sci; 2007 Nov; 72(9):S714-8. PubMed ID: 18034758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consumer acceptance of natural sweeteners in protein beverages.
    Parker MN; Lopetcharat K; Drake MA
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Oct; 101(10):8875-8889. PubMed ID: 30055918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceived intensity and pleasantness of sucrose taste in male alcoholics.
    Wronski M; Skrok-Wolska D; Samochowiec J; Ziolkowski M; Swiecicki L; Bienkowski P; Korkosz A; Zatorski P; Kukwa W; Scinska A
    Alcohol Alcohol; 2007; 42(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 17267440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of Package Visual Cues of Sweeteners on the Sensory-Emotional Profiles of Their Products.
    Wardy W; Chonpracha P; Chokumnoyporn N; Sriwattana S; Prinyawiwatkul W; Jirangrat W
    J Food Sci; 2017 Feb; 82(2):500-508. PubMed ID: 28071796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effect of Sleep Curtailment on Hedonic Responses to Liquid and Solid Food.
    Szczygiel EJ; Cho S; Tucker RM
    Foods; 2019 Oct; 8(10):. PubMed ID: 31658647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re-evaluating how sweet-liking and PROP-tasting are related.
    Yeomans MR; Vi C; Mohammed N; Armitage RM
    Physiol Behav; 2022 Mar; 246():113702. PubMed ID: 35016967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ventromedial prefrontal cortex response to concentrated sucrose reflects liking rather than sweet quality coding.
    Rudenga KJ; Small DM
    Chem Senses; 2013 Sep; 38(7):585-94. PubMed ID: 23828907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding sweet-liking phenotypes and their implications for obesity: Narrative review and future directions.
    Armitage RM; Iatridi V; Yeomans MR
    Physiol Behav; 2021 Jun; 235():113398. PubMed ID: 33771526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consumer acceptability of no added sugar pound cakes under blind and informed testing conditions.
    Williams R; Moazzem MS; Dees J; Hayden M; Traynor M; Cho S
    J Food Sci; 2023 Nov; 88(11):4677-4692. PubMed ID: 37751062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA) comparison of taste profiles for different sweeteners in black tea, chocolate milk, and natural yogurt.
    Tan VWK; Wee MSM; Tomic O; Forde CG
    J Food Sci; 2020 Feb; 85(2):486-492. PubMed ID: 31968393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sweet liking in patients with Parkinson's disease.
    Sienkiewicz-Jarosz H; Scinska A; Swiecicki L; Lipczynska-Lojkowska W; Kuran W; Ryglewicz D; Kolaczkowski M; Samochowiec J; Bienkowski P
    J Neurol Sci; 2013 Jun; 329(1-2):17-22. PubMed ID: 23561981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.