These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33155874)

  • 1. Total evidence or taxonomic congruence? A comparison of methods for combining biological evidence.
    Villalobos-Cid M; Salinas F; Inostroza-Ponta M
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2020 Dec; 18(6):2050040. PubMed ID: 33155874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inferring Trees.
    Whelan S; Morrison DA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1525():349-377. PubMed ID: 27896728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Larger, unfiltered datasets are more effective at resolving phylogenetic conflict: Introns, exons, and UCEs resolve ambiguities in Golden-backed frogs (Anura: Ranidae; genus Hylarana).
    Chan KO; Hutter CR; Wood PL; Grismer LL; Brown RM
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2020 Oct; 151():106899. PubMed ID: 32590046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visualizing conflicting evolutionary hypotheses in large collections of trees: using consensus networks to study the origins of placentals and hexapods.
    Holland B; Delsuc F; Moulton V
    Syst Biol; 2005 Feb; 54(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 15805011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment.
    Lunter G; Miklós I; Drummond A; Jensen JL; Hein J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():83. PubMed ID: 15804354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules, and morphology.
    Eernisse DJ; Kluge AG
    Mol Biol Evol; 1993 Nov; 10(6):1170-95. PubMed ID: 8277850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the Performance of Probabilistic Algorithms for Phylogenetic Analysis of Big Morphological Datasets: A Simulation Study.
    Vernygora OV; Simões TR; Campbell EO
    Syst Biol; 2020 Nov; 69(6):1088-1105. PubMed ID: 32191335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parsimony, not Bayesian analysis, recovers more stratigraphically congruent phylogenetic trees.
    Sansom RS; Choate PG; Keating JN; Randle E
    Biol Lett; 2018 Jun; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 29925561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Molecular systematics of the Eastern Fence Lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): a comparison of Parsimony, Likelihood, and Bayesian approaches.
    Leaché AD; Reeder TW
    Syst Biol; 2002 Feb; 51(1):44-68. PubMed ID: 11943092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The gene tree delusion.
    Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):1-33. PubMed ID: 26238460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utility of targeted sequence capture for phylogenomics in rapid, recent angiosperm radiations: Neotropical Burmeistera bellflowers as a case study.
    Bagley JC; Uribe-Convers S; Carlsen MM; Muchhala N
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2020 Nov; 152():106769. PubMed ID: 32081762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incongruence between gene trees and species trees and phylogenetic signal variation in plastid genes.
    Gonçalves DJP; Simpson BB; Ortiz EM; Shimizu GH; Jansen RK
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2019 Sep; 138():219-232. PubMed ID: 31146023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applying a multiobjective metaheuristic inspired by honey bees to phylogenetic inference.
    Santander-Jiménez S; Vega-Rodríguez MA
    Biosystems; 2013 Oct; 114(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 23850533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deduction of probable events of lateral gene transfer through comparison of phylogenetic trees by recursive consolidation and rearrangement.
    MacLeod D; Charlebois RL; Doolittle F; Bapteste E
    BMC Evol Biol; 2005 Apr; 5():27. PubMed ID: 15819979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating placental inter-ordinal phylogenies with novel sequences including RAG1, gamma-fibrinogen, ND6, and mt-tRNA, plus MCMC-driven nucleotide, amino acid, and codon models.
    Waddell PJ; Shelley S
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2003 Aug; 28(2):197-224. PubMed ID: 12878459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. EM for phylogenetic topology reconstruction on nonhomogeneous data.
    Ibáñez-Marcelo E; Casanellas M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2014 Jun; 14():132. PubMed ID: 24938507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Foundations of the new phylogenetics].
    Pavlinov IIa
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2004; 65(4):334-66. PubMed ID: 15490579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Species trees from highly incongruent gene trees in rice.
    Cranston KA; Hurwitz B; Ware D; Stein L; Wing RA
    Syst Biol; 2009 Oct; 58(5):489-500. PubMed ID: 20525603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design.
    McCormack JE; Huang H; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2009 Oct; 58(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 20525604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Boolean analysis and standard phylogenetic methods using artificially evolved and natural mt-tRNA sequences from great apes.
    Ari E; Ittzés P; Podani J; Thi QC; Jakó E
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2012 Apr; 63(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 22289866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.