These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33155996)

  • 1. External validation of a prediction model on vaginal birth after caesarean in a The Netherlands: a prospective cohort study.
    Vankan E; van Kuijk SMJ; Nijhuis JG; Aardenburg R; Delemarre FMC; Dirksen CD; van Dooren IM; Kuppens SMI; Kwee A; Langenveld J; Schoorel EN; Smits LJ; Hermens RP; Scheepers HC
    J Perinat Med; 2021 Mar; 49(3):357-363. PubMed ID: 33155996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting successful intended vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section: external validation of two predictive models in a Dutch nationwide registration-based cohort with a high intended vaginal delivery rate.
    Schoorel EN; Melman S; van Kuijk SM; Grobman WA; Kwee A; Mol BW; Nijhuis JG; Smits LJ; Aardenburg R; de Boer K; Delemarre FM; van Dooren IM; Franssen MT; Kleiverda G; Kaplan M; Kuppens SM; Lim FT; Sikkema JM; Smid-Koopman E; Visser H; Vrouenraets FP; Woiski M; Hermens RP; Scheepers HC
    BJOG; 2014 Jun; 121(7):840-7; discussion 847. PubMed ID: 24533534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vaginal birth after a caesarean section: the development of a Western European population-based prediction model for deliveries at term.
    Schoorel EN; van Kuijk SM; Melman S; Nijhuis JG; Smits LJ; Aardenburg R; de Boer K; Delemarre FM; van Dooren IM; Franssen MT; Kaplan M; Kleiverda G; Kuppens SM; Kwee A; Lim FT; Mol BW; Roumen FJ; Sikkema JM; Smid-Koopman E; Visser H; Woiski M; Hermens RP; Scheepers HC
    BJOG; 2014 Jan; 121(2):194-201; discussion 201. PubMed ID: 24373593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Antenatal scoring system in predicting the success of planned vaginal birth following one previous caesarean section.
    Kalok A; Zabil SA; Jamil MA; Lim PS; Shafiee MN; Kampan N; Shah SA; Mohamed Ismail NA
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Apr; 38(3):339-343. PubMed ID: 29017359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after caesarean.
    Chaillet N; Bujold E; Dubé E; Grobman WA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Feb; 35(2):119-124. PubMed ID: 23470060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting the success of vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study in China.
    Li YX; Bai Z; Long DJ; Wang HB; Wu YF; Reilly KH; Huang SR; Ji YJ
    BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e027807. PubMed ID: 31129593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of successful trial of labor after cesarean - the benefit of prior vaginal delivery.
    Ashwal E; Wertheimer A; Aviram A; Wiznitzer A; Yogev Y; Hiersch L
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(16):2665-70. PubMed ID: 26399162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting vaginal birth after caesarean section: Validation of the Grobman model in a New Zealand population.
    Windsor RS; Clark HE; Blasingame JLJ
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Oct; 62(5):658-663. PubMed ID: 35342928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating success of vaginal birth after caesarean section in a regional Australian population: Validation of a prediction model.
    Mooney SS; Hiscock R; Clarke ID; Craig S
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Feb; 59(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 29672825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mode of birth after caesarean section: individual prediction scores using Scottish population data.
    Denham SH; Humphrey T; deLabrusse C; Dougall N
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Feb; 19(1):84. PubMed ID: 30819140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of updated antenatal vaginal birth after caesarean section prediction model without race and ethnicity in Australia.
    Liu CZ; Mahomed K
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Jun; 63(3):314-320. PubMed ID: 36259468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of the use of a decision aid with individual risk estimation on the mode of delivery after a caesarean section: A prospective cohort study.
    Vankan E; Schoorel E; van Kuijk S; Nijhuis J; Hermens R; Scheepers H;
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222499. PubMed ID: 31557177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding Factors Leading to Primary Cesarean Section and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery in the Friuli-Venezia Giulia Region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005-2015.
    Cegolon L; Mastrangelo G; Maso G; Dal Pozzo G; Ronfani L; Cegolon A; Heymann WC; Barbone F
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):380. PubMed ID: 31941963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Establishment of an antepartum predictive scoring model to identify candidates for vaginal birth after cesarean.
    Liao Q; Luo J; Zheng L; Han Q; Liu Z; Qi W; Yang T; Yan J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):639. PubMed ID: 33081753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. French validation and adaptation of the Grobman nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
    Haumonte JB; Raylet M; Christophe M; Mauviel F; Bertrand A; Desbriere R; d'Ercole C
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Mar; 47(3):127-131. PubMed ID: 29229362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors associated with the outcome of TOLAC after one previous caesarean section: a retrospective cohort study.
    Parveen S; Rengaraj S; Chaturvedula L
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Apr; 42(3):430-436. PubMed ID: 34151688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical induction of labor and ecbolic-less vaginal birth after cesarean section: A cohort study.
    Atia H; Ellaithy M; Altraigey A; Kolkailah M; Alserehi A; Ashfaq S
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 57(3):421-426. PubMed ID: 29880177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving VBAC rates: the combined impact of two management strategies.
    Gardner K; Henry A; Thou S; Davis G; Miller T
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Aug; 54(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 25117188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trends in birth choices after caesarean section in Japan: A national survey examining information and access to vaginal birth after caesarean.
    Torigoe I; Shorten B; Yoshida S; Shorten A
    Midwifery; 2016 Jun; 37():49-56. PubMed ID: 27217237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model in women with two prior cesarean deliveries.
    Metz TD; Allshouse AA; Faucett AM; Grobman WA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 125(4):948-952. PubMed ID: 25751218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.