152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33156202)
1. Negative Patient Reviews and Online Defamation: A Guide for the Obstetrician-Gynecologist.
Moutos CP; Verma K; Phelps JY
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 136(6):1221-1226. PubMed ID: 33156202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient satisfaction reviews: expression of opinion or defamation?
Regan J; Smith L; Miles E
Tenn Med; 2009 Mar; 102(3):41-2. PubMed ID: 19354060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A physician's exposure to defamation.
Mandell WJ
Qual Assur Util Rev; 1992; 7(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 1603860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Internet Disruptions in the Doctor-Patient Relationship.
Freckelton IR
Med Law Rev; 2020 Aug; 28(3):502-525. PubMed ID: 32417891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ACOG Committee opinion no. 551: coping with the stress of medical professional liability litigation.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):220-2. PubMed ID: 23262965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can a physician sue for online defamation?
Tenn Med; 2011 Mar; 104(3):11-2. PubMed ID: 21818926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Dishonest Physician Reviews: Challenging Physician Online Reviews and the Appeals Process.
Malhotra R; Reddy A; Jotwani R; Schatman ME; Mehta ND
J Med Syst; 2023 Dec; 48(1):5. PubMed ID: 38127210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Legal remedies for online defamation of physicians.
Segal J; Sacopulos MJ; Rivera DJ
J Leg Med; 2009; 30(3):349-88. PubMed ID: 19681012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. THEY SAID WHAT? REPUTATION MATTERS.
Stevens D
Physician Leadersh J; 2017 Mar; 4(2):32-34. PubMed ID: 30571881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of medical litigation filed against obstetrics and gynecology, internal medicine, and surgery departments.
Hamasaki T; Hagihara A
BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Oct; 16(1):72. PubMed ID: 26498823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient assessments and online ratings of quality care: a "wake-up call" for providers.
Merrell JG; Levy BH; Johnson DA
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Nov; 108(11):1676-85. PubMed ID: 24192941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The development of online doctor reviews in China: an analysis of the largest online doctor review website in China.
Hao H
J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jun; 17(6):e134. PubMed ID: 26032933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [German language physician rating sites].
Strech D; Reimann S
Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Aug; 74(8-9):e61-7. PubMed ID: 22189671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Understanding Your Online Ratings: A Methodological Analysis Using Urogynecologists in the United States.
Huber SA; Priestley J; Kasabwala K; Gadidov B; Culligan P
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):193-197. PubMed ID: 30807427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Leading climate scientist Mann wins $1m in defamation lawsuit.
Iacobucci G
BMJ; 2024 Feb; 384():q401. PubMed ID: 38355147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Committee opinion no. 497: Coping with the stress of medical professional liability litigation.
Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 118(2 Pt 1):389-391. PubMed ID: 21775871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Negative Online Patient Reviews in Headache Medicine.
Evans RW
Headache; 2018 Oct; 58(9):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 30362525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Report of the AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs: professionalism in the use of social media.
Shore R; Halsey J; Shah K; Crigger BJ; Douglas SP;
J Clin Ethics; 2011; 22(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 21837888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unhappy Patients Are Not Alike: Content Analysis of the Negative Comments from China's Good Doctor Website.
Zhang W; Deng Z; Hong Z; Evans R; Ma J; Zhang H
J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jan; 20(1):e35. PubMed ID: 29371176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Physician's gender, communication style, patient preferences and patient satisfaction in gynecology and obstetrics: a systematic review.
Janssen SM; Lagro-Janssen AL
Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Nov; 89(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 22819711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]