BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33156202)

  • 1. Negative Patient Reviews and Online Defamation: A Guide for the Obstetrician-Gynecologist.
    Moutos CP; Verma K; Phelps JY
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 136(6):1221-1226. PubMed ID: 33156202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient satisfaction reviews: expression of opinion or defamation?
    Regan J; Smith L; Miles E
    Tenn Med; 2009 Mar; 102(3):41-2. PubMed ID: 19354060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A physician's exposure to defamation.
    Mandell WJ
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1992; 7(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 1603860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Internet Disruptions in the Doctor-Patient Relationship.
    Freckelton IR
    Med Law Rev; 2020 Aug; 28(3):502-525. PubMed ID: 32417891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ACOG Committee opinion no. 551: coping with the stress of medical professional liability litigation.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):220-2. PubMed ID: 23262965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can a physician sue for online defamation?
    Tenn Med; 2011 Mar; 104(3):11-2. PubMed ID: 21818926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dishonest Physician Reviews: Challenging Physician Online Reviews and the Appeals Process.
    Malhotra R; Reddy A; Jotwani R; Schatman ME; Mehta ND
    J Med Syst; 2023 Dec; 48(1):5. PubMed ID: 38127210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Legal remedies for online defamation of physicians.
    Segal J; Sacopulos MJ; Rivera DJ
    J Leg Med; 2009; 30(3):349-88. PubMed ID: 19681012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. THEY SAID WHAT? REPUTATION MATTERS.
    Stevens D
    Physician Leadersh J; 2017 Mar; 4(2):32-34. PubMed ID: 30571881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of medical litigation filed against obstetrics and gynecology, internal medicine, and surgery departments.
    Hamasaki T; Hagihara A
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Oct; 16(1):72. PubMed ID: 26498823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient assessments and online ratings of quality care: a "wake-up call" for providers.
    Merrell JG; Levy BH; Johnson DA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Nov; 108(11):1676-85. PubMed ID: 24192941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The development of online doctor reviews in China: an analysis of the largest online doctor review website in China.
    Hao H
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jun; 17(6):e134. PubMed ID: 26032933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [German language physician rating sites].
    Strech D; Reimann S
    Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Aug; 74(8-9):e61-7. PubMed ID: 22189671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding Your Online Ratings: A Methodological Analysis Using Urogynecologists in the United States.
    Huber SA; Priestley J; Kasabwala K; Gadidov B; Culligan P
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):193-197. PubMed ID: 30807427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Leading climate scientist Mann wins $1m in defamation lawsuit.
    Iacobucci G
    BMJ; 2024 Feb; 384():q401. PubMed ID: 38355147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Committee opinion no. 497: Coping with the stress of medical professional liability litigation.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 118(2 Pt 1):389-391. PubMed ID: 21775871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Negative Online Patient Reviews in Headache Medicine.
    Evans RW
    Headache; 2018 Oct; 58(9):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 30362525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Report of the AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs: professionalism in the use of social media.
    Shore R; Halsey J; Shah K; Crigger BJ; Douglas SP;
    J Clin Ethics; 2011; 22(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 21837888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unhappy Patients Are Not Alike: Content Analysis of the Negative Comments from China's Good Doctor Website.
    Zhang W; Deng Z; Hong Z; Evans R; Ma J; Zhang H
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jan; 20(1):e35. PubMed ID: 29371176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physician's gender, communication style, patient preferences and patient satisfaction in gynecology and obstetrics: a systematic review.
    Janssen SM; Lagro-Janssen AL
    Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Nov; 89(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 22819711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.