191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33156387)
1. Optimized radiological alert thresholds based on device dosimetric information and peak skin dose in vascular fluoroscopically guided intervention.
Sas N; Magnier F; Pouget E; Dedieu V; Guersen J; Chabrot P; Boyer L; Cassagnes L
Eur Radiol; 2021 May; 31(5):3027-3034. PubMed ID: 33156387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimized radiological alert thresholds based on device-dosimetric information to predict peak skin dose between 2 and 4 Gy during vascular fluoroscopically guided intervention.
Sas N; Lacroix JB; Dedieu V; Boyer L
Eur Radiol; 2023 Aug; 33(8):5707-5716. PubMed ID: 36932215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiation dose to the operator during fluoroscopically guided spine procedures.
Roccatagliata L; Presilla S; Pravatà E; Cianfoni A
Neuroradiology; 2017 Sep; 59(9):885-892. PubMed ID: 28721441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Establishment of trigger levels to steer the follow-up of radiation effects in patients undergoing fluoroscopically-guided interventional procedures in Belgium.
Struelens L; Bacher K; Bosmans H; Bleeser F; Hoornaert MT; Malchair F; Balter S
Phys Med; 2014 Dec; 30(8):934-40. PubMed ID: 25277316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reference air kerma and kerma-area product as estimators of peak skin dose for fluoroscopically guided interventions.
Kwon D; Little MP; Miller DL
Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4196-204. PubMed ID: 21859021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effective Dose Assessment for Patients Undergoing Contemporary Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Procedures.
Li X; Hirsch JA; Rehani MM; Yang K; Liu B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jan; 214(1):158-170. PubMed ID: 31670595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving Patient Safety: Implementing Dose Monitoring Software in Fluoroscopically Guided Interventions.
Heilmaier C; Niklaus Z; Berthold C; Kara L; Weishaupt D
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1699-709. PubMed ID: 26371999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DO THE BMI AND SURGEON INFLUENCE THE PATIENT DOSE IN FLUOROSCOPICALLY GUIDED LUMBAR DISCECTOMY AND FUSION?☆.
Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Gatzounis GD; Tzortzidis FN; Panayiotakis GS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(4):472-482. PubMed ID: 30916774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How accurately can the peak skin dose in fluoroscopy be determined using indirect dose metrics?
Jones AK; Ensor JE; Pasciak AS
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071913. PubMed ID: 24989391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgeon education decreases radiation dose in complex endovascular procedures and improves patient safety.
Kirkwood ML; Arbique GM; Guild JB; Timaran C; Chung J; Anderson JA; Valentine RJ
J Vasc Surg; 2013 Sep; 58(3):715-21. PubMed ID: 23688628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combined Use of a Patient Dose Monitoring System and a Real-Time Occupational Dose Monitoring System for Fluoroscopically Guided Interventions.
Heilmaier C; Kara L; Zuber N; Berthold C; Weishaupt D
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2016 Apr; 27(4):584-92. PubMed ID: 26724965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. KERMA-AREA PRODUCT, ENTRANCE SURFACE DOSE AND EFFECTIVE DOSE IN ABDOMINAL ENDOVASCULAR ANEURYSM REPAIR.
Efthymiou FO; Metaxas VI; Dimitroukas CP; Kakkos SK; Panayiotakis GS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 Jul; 194(2-3):121-134. PubMed ID: 34227656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation exposure in 101 non-coronary fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: reference levels of air kerma at the reference point and air kerma area product.
Li X; Hirsch JA; Rehani MM; Yang K; Marschall TA; Liu B
Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20211108. PubMed ID: 34826249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of indirect radiation dose estimates with directly measured radiation dose for patients and operators during complex endovascular procedures.
Panuccio G; Greenberg RK; Wunderle K; Mastracci TM; Eagleton MG; Davros W
J Vasc Surg; 2011 Apr; 53(4):885-894.e1; discussion 894. PubMed ID: 21292431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A study of dose indicators during intra-arterial catheter implantation for liver chemotherapy.
Izaaryene J; Golin M; Daidj N; Piana G; Ferre M
J Radiol Prot; 2021 Aug; 41(3):. PubMed ID: 33827058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Status of radiation protection in interventional cardiology in four East European countries.
Ciraj-Bjelac O; Beganović A; Faj D; Ivanovic S; Videnovic I; Rehani M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):62-7. PubMed ID: 21725081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation-induced skin injury after complex endovascular procedures.
Kirkwood ML; Arbique GM; Guild JB; Timaran C; Valentine RJ; Anderson JA
J Vasc Surg; 2014 Sep; 60(3):742-8. PubMed ID: 24768364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A hybrid phantom system for patient skin and organ dosimetry in fluoroscopically guided interventions.
Borrego D; Siragusa DA; Balter S; Bolch WE
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4928-4942. PubMed ID: 28636805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PATIENT DOSIMETRY DURING INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC PROCEDURES IN A DEDICATED CATHETERIZATION LABORATORY.
Uniyal SC; Chaturvedi V; Sharma SD; Rawat A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Jun; 175(2):201-208. PubMed ID: 27744352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimation of patient skin dose in fluoroscopy: summary of a joint report by AAPM TG357 and EFOMP.
Andersson J; Bednarek DR; Bolch W; Boltz T; Bosmans H; Gislason-Lee AJ; Granberg C; Hellstrom M; Kanal K; McDonagh E; Paden R; Pavlicek W; Khodadadegan Y; Torresin A; Trianni A; Zamora D
Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 48(7):e671-e696. PubMed ID: 33930183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
