293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33156569)
1. A comprehensive study on electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography sensitivity to cortical and subcortical sources.
Piastra MC; Nüßing A; Vorwerk J; Clerc M; Engwer C; Wolters CH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Mar; 42(4):978-992. PubMed ID: 33156569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mapping the signal-to-noise-ratios of cortical sources in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
Goldenholz DM; Ahlfors SP; Hämäläinen MS; Sharon D; Ishitobi M; Vaina LM; Stufflebeam SM
Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Apr; 30(4):1077-86. PubMed ID: 18465745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. EEG and MEG: sensitivity to epileptic spike activity as function of source orientation and depth.
Hunold A; Funke ME; Eichardt R; Stenroos M; Haueisen J
Physiol Meas; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1146-62. PubMed ID: 27328313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cortical Signal Suppression (CSS) for Detection of Subcortical Activity Using MEG and EEG.
Samuelsson JG; Khan S; Sundaram P; Peled N; Hämäläinen MS
Brain Topogr; 2019 Mar; 32(2):215-228. PubMed ID: 30604048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of stimulation type, head modeling, and combined EEG and MEG on the source reconstruction of the somatosensory P20/N20 component.
Antonakakis M; Schrader S; Wollbrink A; Oostenveld R; Rampp S; Haueisen J; Wolters CH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Dec; 40(17):5011-5028. PubMed ID: 31397966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complex patterns of spatially extended generators of epileptic activity: Comparison of source localization methods cMEM and 4-ExSo-MUSIC on high resolution EEG and MEG data.
Chowdhury RA; Merlet I; Birot G; Kobayashi E; Nica A; Biraben A; Wendling F; Lina JM; Albera L; Grova C
Neuroimage; 2016 Dec; 143():175-195. PubMed ID: 27561712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity of MEG and EEG to source orientation.
Ahlfors SP; Han J; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS
Brain Topogr; 2010 Sep; 23(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 20640882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can EEG and MEG detect signals from the human cerebellum?
Andersen LM; Jerbi K; Dalal SS
Neuroimage; 2020 Jul; 215():116817. PubMed ID: 32278092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of beamformer implementations for MEG source localization.
Jaiswal A; Nenonen J; Stenroos M; Gramfort A; Dalal SS; Westner BU; Litvak V; Mosher JC; Schoffelen JM; Witton C; Oostenveld R; Parkkonen L
Neuroimage; 2020 Aug; 216():116797. PubMed ID: 32278091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detectability of cerebellar activity with magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
Samuelsson JG; Sundaram P; Khan S; Sereno MI; Hämäläinen MS
Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Jun; 41(9):2357-2372. PubMed ID: 32115870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Source cancellation profiles of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography.
Irimia A; Van Horn JD; Halgren E
Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2464-74. PubMed ID: 21959078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Beamformer source analysis and connectivity on concurrent EEG and MEG data during voluntary movements.
Muthuraman M; Hellriegel H; Hoogenboom N; Anwar AR; Mideksa KG; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J
PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91441. PubMed ID: 24618596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On-scalp MEG SQUIDs are sensitive to early somatosensory activity unseen by conventional MEG.
Andersen LM; Pfeiffer C; Ruffieux S; Riaz B; Winkler D; Schneiderman JF; Lundqvist D
Neuroimage; 2020 Nov; 221():117157. PubMed ID: 32659354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tangential and radial epileptic spike activity: different sensitivity in EEG and MEG.
Haueisen J; Funke M; Güllmar D; Eichardt R
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Aug; 29(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 22854766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG.
Vorwerk J; Cho JH; Rampp S; Hamer H; Knösche TR; Wolters CH
Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():590-607. PubMed ID: 24971512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG to the N1 and P2 auditory evoked responses modulated by spectral complexity of sounds.
Shahin AJ; Roberts LE; Miller LM; McDonald KL; Alain C
Brain Topogr; 2007; 20(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 17899352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources.
Huang MX; Song T; Hagler DJ; Podgorny I; Jousmaki V; Cui L; Gaa K; Harrington DL; Dale AM; Lee RR; Elman J; Halgren E
Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):731-48. PubMed ID: 17658272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combined EEG and MEG analysis of early somatosensory evoked activity in children and adolescents with focal epilepsies.
Bast T; Wright T; Boor R; Harting I; Feneberg R; Rupp A; Hoechstetter K; Rating D; Baumgärtner U
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1721-35. PubMed ID: 17572142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
