621 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33157570)
1. The Long-Term Risks of Metastases in Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
Maggi M; Cowan JE; Fasulo V; Washington SL; Lonergan PE; Sciarra A; Nguyen HG; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1222-1228. PubMed ID: 33157570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. PI-RADS® Category as a Predictor of Progression to Unfavorable Risk Prostate Cancer in Men on Active Surveillance.
Wang AZ; O’Conno LP; Yerram NK; Long L; Zeng J; Mehralivand S; Harmon SA; Lebastchi AH; Ahdoot M; Gomella PT; Gurram S; Choyke PL; Merino MJ; Shih JH; Wood BJ; Turkbey B; Pinto PA
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1229-1235. PubMed ID: 32716685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk Factors for Biopsy Reclassification over Time in Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
Lonergan PE; Washington SL; Cowan JE; Zhao S; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1216-1221. PubMed ID: 32519915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Risk of Prostate Cancer Progression in Active Surveillance Patients with Bilateral Disease Detected by Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Fusion and Systematic Biopsy.
Williams C; Khondakar NR; Daneshvar MA; O'Connor LP; Gomella PT; Mehralivand S; Yerram NK; Egan J; Gurram S; Rompré-Brodeur A; Webster BR; Owens-Walton J; Parnes H; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Choyke P; Turkbey B; Pinto PA
J Urol; 2021 Nov; 206(5):1157-1165. PubMed ID: 34181465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does the Visibility of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer on Baseline Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Impact Clinical Outcomes?
Deniffel D; Salinas E; Ientilucci M; Evans AJ; Fleshner N; Ghai S; Hamilton R; Roberts A; Toi A; van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Finelli A; Haider MA; Perlis N
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1187-1194. PubMed ID: 32496160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging With PI-RADS, Version 2, in Patients With Prostate Cancer Eligible for Active Surveillance: Which Radiologic Characteristics Can Predict Unfavorable Disease?
Kim H; Pak S; Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK; Kim M; You D; Jeong IG; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2020 Feb; 18(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 31640913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Clinical Significance of Multiple Negative Surveillance Prostate Biopsies for Men on Active Surveillance-Does Cancer Vanish or Simply Hide?
Chu CE; Cowan JE; Fasulo V; Washington SL; de la Calle C; Shoemaker J; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2021 Jan; 205(1):109-114. PubMed ID: 33198555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors Associated with Time to Conversion from Active Surveillance to Treatment for Prostate Cancer in a Multi-Institutional Cohort.
Cooley LF; Emeka AA; Meyers TJ; Cooper PR; Lin DW; Finelli A; Eastham JA; Logothetis CJ; Marks LS; Vesprini D; Goldenberg SL; Higano CS; Pavlovich CP; Chan JM; Morgan TM; Klein EA; Barocas DA; Loeb S; Helfand BT; Scholtens DM; Witte JS; Catalona WJ;
J Urol; 2021 Nov; 206(5):1147-1156. PubMed ID: 34503355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating the Safety of Active Surveillance: Outcomes of Deferred Radical Prostatectomy after an Initial Period of Surveillance.
Balakrishnan AS; Cowan JE; Cooperberg MR; Shinohara K; Nguyen HG; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2019 Sep; 202(3):506-510. PubMed ID: 30958738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer-Is Active Surveillance Appropriate?
Aghazadeh MA; Frankel J; Belanger M; McLaughlin T; Tortora J; Staff I; Wagner JR
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1196-1201. PubMed ID: 29288120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic Implications of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Concomitant Systematic Biopsy in Predicting Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy.
Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Valerio M; Marra G; Moschini M; Martini A; Roumiguié M; Fossati N; Stabile A; Beauval JB; Malavaud B; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Afferi L; Rakauskas A; Gontero P; Mattei A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 3(6):739-747. PubMed ID: 32847747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.
Faiena I; Salmasi A; Mendhiratta N; Markovic D; Ahuja P; Hsu W; Elashoff DA; Raman SS; Reiter RE
J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 30577397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Association of Periprostatic Fat and Grade Group Progression in Men with Localized Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.
Gregg JR; Surasi DS; Childs A; Moll N; Ward JF; Kim J; Daniel CR; Logothetis C; Bathala T; Davis JW
J Urol; 2021 Jan; 205(1):122-128. PubMed ID: 32718204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic Accuracy and Prognostic Value of Serial Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.
Chu CE; Cowan JE; Lonergan PE; Washington SL; Fasulo V; de la Calle CM; Shinohara K; Westphalen AC; Carroll PR
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 5(5):537-543. PubMed ID: 33483265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Selecting Patients with Favorable Risk, Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer for Active Surveillance-Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Have a Role?
Stonier T; Tin AL; Sjoberg DD; Jibara G; Vickers AJ; Fine S; Eastham J
J Urol; 2021 Apr; 205(4):1063-1068. PubMed ID: 33216696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. African American Race is Not Associated with Risk of Reclassification during Active Surveillance: Results from the Canary Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Study.
Schenk JM; Newcomb LF; Zheng Y; Faino AV; Zhu K; Nyame YA; Brooks JD; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR; Dash A; Filson CP; Gleave ME; Liss M; Martin FM; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Lin DW
J Urol; 2020 Apr; 203(4):727-733. PubMed ID: 31651227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Confirmatory Biopsy for Initiating Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.
Jayadevan R; Felker ER; Kwan L; Barsa DE; Zhang H; Sisk AE; Delfin M; Marks LS
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Sep; 2(9):e1911019. PubMed ID: 31509206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Multicenter Study of the Clinical Utility of Nontargeted Systematic Transperineal Prostate Biopsies in Patients Undergoing Pre-Biopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Connor MJ; Eldred-Evans D; van Son M; Hosking-Jervis F; Bertoncelli Tanaka M; Reddy D; Bass EJ; Powell L; Ahmad S; Pegers E; Joshi S; Sri D; Wong K; Tam H; Hrouda D; Qazi H; Gordon S; Winkler M; Ahmed HU
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 32516029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the relationship between statin use and oncologic outcomes among men electing active surveillance for localized prostate cancer.
Nyame YA; Wilkins L; Greene DJ; Ganesan V; Dai C; Almassi N; Stephenson AJ; Gong M; Berglund R; Klein EA
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2019 Dec; 22(4):617-623. PubMed ID: 30996285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of Serial Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Biopsies in Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance After 1 Yr Follow-up.
Hamoen EHJ; Hoeks CMA; Somford DM; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Oddens JR; Smits GA; Bokhorst LP; Witjes JA; Rovers MM; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 May; 5(3):407-415. PubMed ID: 29331622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
