These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33158610)
1. [Comparison of Goldmann tonometry with air-puff tonometry. A study of 159 patients in Abidjan]. Kouassi Rebours AC; Kouassi FX; Soumahoro M; Koman Chiatse Ellalie CE; Alla Ngoran Siméon KRA; Agbohoun RP J Fr Ophtalmol; 2021 Jan; 44(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 33158610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements obtained by icare pro tonometer, non-contact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in healthy individuals. Duran M J Fr Ophtalmol; 2023 Dec; 46(10):1195-1203. PubMed ID: 37666735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals. Kamel K; Dervan E; Falzon K; O'Brien C Ir J Med Sci; 2019 Feb; 188(1):321-325. PubMed ID: 29616408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure differences between an air-puff tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Tranchina L; Lombardo M; Oddone F; Serrao S; Schiano Lomoriello D; Ducoli P J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(5):416-21. PubMed ID: 22366703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Correlation of intraocular pressure measured by applanation tonometry, noncontact tonometry and TonoPen with central corneal thickness]. Burdová MC; Ferrová K; Filous A; Oskorypová K; Lezatková P; Sedlácková P Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2011; 67(5-6):154-7. PubMed ID: 22448415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?]. Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Association of Central Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure Measures by Non-Contact Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry among Glaucoma Patients. Kyei S; Assiamah F; Kwarteng MA; Gboglu CP Ethiop J Health Sci; 2020 Nov; 30(6):999-1004. PubMed ID: 33883845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Change in intraocular pressure in myopic eyes measured with contact and non-contact tonometers after laser in situ keratomileusis. El Danasoury MA; El Maghraby A; Coorpender SJ J Refract Surg; 2001; 17(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 11310772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery. Shousha SM; Abo Steit MA; Hosny MH; Ewais WA; Shalaby AM Clin Ophthalmol; 2013; 7():71-9. PubMed ID: 23326186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of intraocular pressure using Goldmann applanation tonometry versus non-contact tonometry in eyes with high-viscosity silicone oil. Pagoulatos DD; Kapsala ZG; Makri OE; Georgalas IG; Georgakopoulos CD Eur J Ophthalmol; 2020 May; 30(3):494-499. PubMed ID: 30832494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between the values of intra-ocular pressure measured by Goldmann applanation tonometer and Air-Puff non-contact tonometer and their relationship with central corneal thickness. Javed A; Arshad MO; Nasir J; Chatni MH; Ayub B J Pak Med Assoc; 2022 Jan; 72(1):149-151. PubMed ID: 35099455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Goldmann applanation tonometer versus ocular response analyzer for measuring intraocular pressure after congenital cataract surgery. Feizi S; Faramarzi A; Kheiri B Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):582-589. PubMed ID: 30246567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the corrected intraocular pressure by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal and glaucomatous patients. Velis G; Kavitha S; Zebardast N; Sengupta S; Venkatesh R Indian J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 68(4):620-626. PubMed ID: 32174582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry. Schneider E; Grehn F J Glaucoma; 2006 Feb; 15(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 16378009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients. Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement of the intraocular pressure with the "transpalpebral tonometer" TGDc-01 in comparison with applanation tonometry. Sandner D; Böhm A; Kostov S; Pillunat L Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 243(6):563-9. PubMed ID: 15614540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Intraocular pressure and corneal thickness. A comparison between non-contact tonometry and applanation tonometry]. Domke N; Hager A; Wiegand W Ophthalmologe; 2006 Jul; 103(7):583-7. PubMed ID: 16786183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of central corneal thickness on Goldmann applanation tonometry measures - a different result with different pachymeters. Doughty MJ; Jonuscheit S Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 245(11):1603-10. PubMed ID: 17522884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement of intraocular pressure in LASIK and LASEK patients using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Kirwan C; O'Keefe M J Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 24(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 18500086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]