219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33158693)
1. Narrow-diameter implants versus regular-diameter implants for rehabilitation of the anterior region: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cruz RS; Lemos CAA; de Batista VES; Yogui FC; Oliveira HFF; Verri FR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 May; 50(5):674-682. PubMed ID: 33158693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Clinical Performance of Narrow Diameter Implants Versus Regular Diameter Implants: A Meta-Analysis.
Ma M; Qi M; Zhang D; Liu H
J Oral Implantol; 2019 Dec; 45(6):503-508. PubMed ID: 31536434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Narrow- and regular-diameter implants in the posterior region of the jaws to support single crowns: A 3-year split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
de Souza AB; Sukekava F; Tolentino L; César-Neto JB; Garcez-Filho J; Araújo MG
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):100-107. PubMed ID: 28994192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Narrow-diameter implants in the anterior region: A meta-analysis.
Parize HN; Bohner LOL; Gama LT; Porporatti AL; Mezzomo LAM; Martin WC; Gonçalves TMSV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(6):1347–1358. PubMed ID: 30934032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Survival rate of titanium-zirconium narrow diameter dental implants versus commercially pure titanium narrow diameter dental implants: A systematic review.
Iegami CM; Uehara PN; Sesma N; Pannuti CM; Tortamano Neto P; Mukai MK
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 19(6):1015-1022. PubMed ID: 28853215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Narrow-diameter versus regular-diameter dental implants for mandibular overdentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Park JH; Shin SW; Lee JY
J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):669-678. PubMed ID: 37365991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of survival rate and crestal bone loss of narrow diameter dental implants versus regular dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Alrabiah M
J Investig Clin Dent; 2019 Feb; 10(1):e12367. PubMed ID: 30414262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk factors and reoperative survival rate of failed narrow-diameter implants in the maxillary anterior region.
Yang G; Chen L; Gao Y; Liu H; Dong H; Mou Y
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 22(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 31797552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of external and internal implant-abutment connections for implant supported prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Bonfante EA; Santiago Júnior JF; Pellizzer EP
J Dent; 2018 Mar; 70():14-22. PubMed ID: 29221955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Should the restoration of adjacent implants be splinted or nonsplinted? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Lemos CAA; Cruz RS; Oliveira HFF; Gomes JML; Pellizzer EP
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 29961632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Narrow-diameter implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Schiegnitz E; Al-Nawas B
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():21-40. PubMed ID: 30328192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of 316 narrow diameter implants followed for 5-10 years: a clinical and radiographic retrospective study.
Arisan V; Bölükbaşi N; Ersanli S; Ozdemir T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Mar; 21(3):296-307. PubMed ID: 20443792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of implant diameter on implant survival rate and clinical outcomes in the posterior area: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Pesce P; Del Fabbro M; Modenese L; Sandron S; Francetti L; Isola G; Canullo L; Menini M
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Apr; 23(1):235. PubMed ID: 37085829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical outcomes of titanium-zirconium alloy narrow-diameter implants for single-crown restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cao R; Chen B; Xu H; Fan Z
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Jul; 61(6):403-410. PubMed ID: 37331853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical outcomes of narrow- and regular-diameter implants with bone augmentation in the anterior maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang Y; Wen G; Dong W
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Mar; 28(3):196. PubMed ID: 38443497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of narrow- vs. regular-diameter dental implants: a 3-year follow-up. A retrospective study.
Zweers J; van Doornik A; Hogendorf EA; Quirynen M; Van der Weijden GA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Feb; 26(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 24372952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical outcome of narrow diameter implants: a retrospective study of 510 implants.
Degidi M; Piattelli A; Carinci F
J Periodontol; 2008 Jan; 79(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 18166092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Narrow-Diameter Implants for Partial Fixed and Removable Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Badaró MM; Herdt B; Bezerra AP; Schimmel M; Vega Gonçalves TMS
Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(6):738–751. PubMed ID: 35939793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lemos CA; de Souza Batista VE; Almeida DA; Santiago Júnior JF; Verri FR; Pellizzer EP
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Apr; 115(4):419-27. PubMed ID: 26589441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Less Invasive Surgical Procedures Using Narrow-Diameter Implants: A Prospective Study in 20 Consecutive Patients.
Lambert FE; Lecloux G; Grenade C; Bouhy A; Lamy M; Rompen EH
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Dec; 41(6):693-9. PubMed ID: 24766161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
