These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3315944)

  • 21. Does risk-adjusted readmission rate provide valid information on hospital quality?
    Thomas JW
    Inquiry; 1996; 33(3):258-70. PubMed ID: 8883460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Medicare and Medicaid programs; entities performing quality of care review of services provided by risk-basis health maintenance organizations and competitive medical plans--HCFA. Final rule with comment period.
    Fed Regist; 1987 Oct; 52(194):37454-8. PubMed ID: 10301903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. JCAH and the federal government.
    Schlicke CP
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1979 Mar; 64(3):23-8. PubMed ID: 10297370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Implications of Medicare hospital utilization trends for long term home health care.
    Kelly JT; Shea MA; Ross JE
    Pride Inst J Long Term Home Health Care; 1987; 6(2):14-7. PubMed ID: 10301751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quality of care is high under PPS: HHS study.
    Robinson ML
    Hospitals; 1987 Dec; 61(23):22, 24. PubMed ID: 3315947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. PRO-hospital contracts: the last chance to ease burden of reviews.
    O'Hare PK; Collier G
    Mod Healthc; 1984 Oct; 14(13):54-8. PubMed ID: 10299720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quality assurance in health care--the federal government: PSRO.
    Munier WB
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1974 Jul; 31(7):660-3. PubMed ID: 4605000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The PRO utilization and quality review process: an overview--Part I.
    Politser P
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1989 May; 74(5):17-22. PubMed ID: 10303472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. PRO objectives and quality criteria.
    Grimaldi PL; Micheletti JA
    Hospitals; 1985 Feb; 59(3):64-7. PubMed ID: 3881333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. One peer review organization's experience in developing hospital peer groups.
    Sumner BM; Thompson MS; Suarez WG; Davis M; Bell JA; Shanedling SB
    Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1993; 1(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 10135642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Liability seen as side effect of substandard-care rules.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1989 Mar; 19(9):46. PubMed ID: 10303274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Medicare and Medicaid programs; utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO): assumption of Medicare review functions and coordination with Medicaid--HCFA. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(74):15312-35. PubMed ID: 10299989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Health Care Quality Improvement Program: the WVMI returns to its founding mission.
    Weeks HS
    W V Med J; 1994 Apr; 90(4):138-9. PubMed ID: 8009870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The new scope of work: what it means to PROs and providers.
    Siegel SH
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Aug; 40(8):64-8. PubMed ID: 10277300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. PRO denial of payment for substandard care: a flawed federal initiative.
    Blau ML
    Healthspan; 1989 May; 6(5):8-10. PubMed ID: 10303546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Denial of payment for poor quality care. Missouri's PRO explains Medicare's latest requirement.
    Akhter MN; Jaco D
    Mo Med; 1987 Mar; 84(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 3334407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. PSROs and internal hospital review.
    Farrell JR
    Hosp Prog; 1973 Oct; 54(10):64-6 passim. PubMed ID: 4795761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Measuring quality of care.
    Horwitz M
    Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(4):31-8. PubMed ID: 10290182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Extra: HCFA list of 18 ways to incur PRO penalty points.
    Part B News; 1989 Aug; 3(8):suppl 1-2. PubMed ID: 10303749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Providers question PROs' effectiveness. Critics contend peer review organizations are too costly and fail to improve the quality of care.
    Rothschild RD
    Health Prog; 1992; 73(6):28-32, 38. PubMed ID: 10119535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.