274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33159662)
1. Safety and efficacy of robot-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of multiple worldwide centers.
Zhang W; Huang Z; Zhang J; Che X
Updates Surg; 2021 Jun; 73(3):893-907. PubMed ID: 33159662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy superior to open procedure? A meta-analysis.
Zhang H; Lan X; Peng B; Li B
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Oct; 25(37):5711-5731. PubMed ID: 31602170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Peng L; Lin S; Li Y; Xiao W
Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3085-3097. PubMed ID: 27928665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.
Chen K; Pan Y; Liu XL; Jiang GY; Wu D; Maher H; Cai XJ
BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):120. PubMed ID: 29169337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety and efficacy for robot-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhao W; Liu C; Li S; Geng D; Feng Y; Sun M
Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 27(3):468-478. PubMed ID: 30217304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: An Up-to-Date Meta-Analysis of Comparative Cohort Studies.
Lyu Y; Cheng Y; Wang B; Xu Y; Du W
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Apr; 29(4):449-457. PubMed ID: 30256164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of short-term outcomes.
Yan Q; Xu LB; Ren ZF; Liu C
Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 31848756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety and effectiveness of open pancreaticoduodenectomy in adults aged 70 or older: A meta-analysis.
Zhang W; Huang Z; Zhang J; Che X
J Geriatr Oncol; 2021 Sep; 12(7):1136-1145. PubMed ID: 33610506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic vs. Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy After Learning Curve: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Single-Center Studies.
Feng Q; Xin Z; Qiu J; Xu M
Front Surg; 2021; 8():715083. PubMed ID: 34568416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Robotic vs Open Pancreatoduodenectomy on Incidence of Pancreatic Fistula.
McMillan MT; Zureikat AH; Hogg ME; Kowalsky SJ; Zeh HJ; Sprys MH; Vollmer CM
JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):327-335. PubMed ID: 28030724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short-term Outcomes After Robot-Assisted vs Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy After the Learning Curve.
Shi Y; Jin J; Qiu W; Weng Y; Wang J; Zhao S; Huo Z; Qin K; Wang Y; Chen H; Deng X; Peng C; Shen B
JAMA Surg; 2020 May; 155(5):389-394. PubMed ID: 32129815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-term outcomes of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.
Liu Q; Jiang N; Tian E; Li M; Zhang H; Zhao G; Tan X; Wang W; Han B; Yuan J; Gan Q; Ma Y; Zhao Z; Liu R
Int J Surg; 2022 Aug; 104():106819. PubMed ID: 35948184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes of Robotic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Low-Risk Surgical Candidates: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.
Liu Q; Zhao Z; Zhang X; Wang W; Han B; Chen X; Tan X; Xu S; Zhao G; Gao Y; Gan Q; Yuan J; Ma Y; Dong Y; Liu Z; Wang H; Fan F; Liu J; Lau WY; Liu R
Ann Surg; 2023 Apr; 277(4):e864-e871. PubMed ID: 34417366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes following laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy after learning curve in the past 10 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Feng Q; Xin Z; Zhu B; Liao M; Liao W; Zeng Y
Gland Surg; 2021 May; 10(5):1655-1668. PubMed ID: 34164310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with lower morbidity compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies.
Yan JF; Pan Y; Chen K; Zhu HP; Chen QL
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Aug; 98(32):e16730. PubMed ID: 31393381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with benign and malignant periampullary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes.
Podda M; Gerardi C; Di Saverio S; Marino MV; Davies RJ; Pellino G; Pisanu A
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2390-2409. PubMed ID: 32072286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Meta-analysis of subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy vs pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Huang W; Xiong JJ; Wan MH; Szatmary P; Bharucha S; Gomatos I; Nunes QM; Xia Q; Sutton R; Liu XB
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(20):6361-73. PubMed ID: 26034372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in all patients and pancreatic cancer patients.
Fu Y; Qiu J; Yu Y; Wu D; Zhang T
Front Surg; 2022; 9():989065. PubMed ID: 36303857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Feng Q; Liao W; Xin Z; Jin H; Du J; Cai Y; Liao M; Yuan K; Zeng Y
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():749140. PubMed ID: 34778064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Expanding laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy to pancreatic-head and periampullary malignancy: major findings based on systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen K; Liu XL; Pan Y; Maher H; Wang XF
BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):102. PubMed ID: 29969999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
