These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins. Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differential wear of teeth and restorative materials: clinical implications. Yip KH; Smales RJ; Kaidonis JA Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 15237885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microscopic observations of the wear of a tooth restorative composite in vivo. Abell AK; Leinfelder KF; Turner DT J Biomed Mater Res; 1983 May; 17(3):501-7. PubMed ID: 6223040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical wear of posterior composites]. Fallierou A; Mari A Hell Stomatol Chron; 1989; 33(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 2486355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo evaluation of the surface of posterior resin composite restorations: a pilot study. Pesun IJ; Olson AK; Hodges JS; Anderson GC J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 11005910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative in vitro sliding-wear study of conventional, microfilled, and light-cured composite restoratives. Rice SL; Bailey WF; Wayne SF; Burns JA J Dent Res; 1984 Sep; 63(9):1173-5. PubMed ID: 6589283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [In vivo wear test for posterior composites. 1. Development of wear test predicting composite wear in vivo]. Horie K; Satoh M; Kawakita H; Hosoda H Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1990 Mar; 9(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 2135520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of the rate of wear of dental composite resins by a 90Sr beta particle transmission gauge. Moores GE; Glentworth P; Harrison A J Biomed Mater Res; 1983 Sep; 17(5):843-53. PubMed ID: 6619180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of a posterior resin composite: 3-year results. Wendt SL; Leinfelder KF Am J Dent; 1994 Aug; 7(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 7986437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Sarrett DC Dent Mater; 2005 Jan; 21(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 15680997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An in vitro evaluation of a copolymerizable type of microfilled composite resin. Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF Quintessence Int; 1994 Jan; 25(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 8190883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A study of retentive filler and its use in dentistry. Xu HC; Wang T; Heindl D; Zheng G; Liu WY; Nagel JR Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Sep; 1(2):7-12. PubMed ID: 10557187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using a new condensable composite for posterior restorations. Poss SD Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 1999; (23):S14-8. PubMed ID: 12089754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]