289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33160695)
21. Robotically assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy: surgical results: a cohort study of 487 patients.
Hudry D; Ahmad S; Zanagnolo V; Narducci F; Fastrez M; Ponce J; Tucher E; Lécuru F; Conri V; Leguevaque P; Goffin F; Holloway RW; Lambaudie E;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Mar; 25(3):504-11. PubMed ID: 25628104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Laparoscopic paraaortic left-sided transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with gynecologic malignancies: technique and results.
Köhler C; Tozzi R; Klemm P; Schneider A
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Oct; 91(1):139-48. PubMed ID: 14529674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy: a study of its applications in gynecological malignancies.
Mehra G; Weekes AR; Jacobs IJ; Visvanathan D; Menon U; Jeyarajah AR
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Apr; 93(1):189-93. PubMed ID: 15047234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery].
Guo RX; Du JM; Wang PR; Li BJ; Li LX; Wang Q; Bai J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 55(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 32146740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymph nodal staging for locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Capozzi VA; Sozzi G; Monfardini L; Di Donna MC; Giallombardo V; Lo Balbo G; Butera D; Berretta R; Chiantera V
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 47(9):2256-2264. PubMed ID: 33972143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Novel Surgical Strategies in the Treatment of Gynecological Malignancies.
Angeles MA; Martínez-Gómez C; Migliorelli F; Voglimacci M; Figurelli J; Motton S; Tanguy Le Gac Y; Ferron G; Martinez A
Curr Treat Options Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(12):73. PubMed ID: 30411170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (TIPAL).
Coronado PJ; Fasero M; Magrina JF; Herraiz MA; Vidart JA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):674-81. PubMed ID: 24486680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Transperitoneal
Prodromidou A; Machairas N; Spartalis E; Kostakis ID; Iavazzo C; Moris D; Tsilimigras DI; Athanasiou A; Nikiteas N
Anticancer Res; 2018 Aug; 38(8):4677-4681. PubMed ID: 30061235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of three surgical approaches for staging lymphadenectomy in high-risk endometrial cancer.
Pulman KJ; Dason ES; Philp L; Bernardini MQ; Ferguson SE; Laframboise S; Atenafu EG; May T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Mar; 136(3):315-319. PubMed ID: 28078775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Implications of extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy to the left renal vein in locally advanced cervical cancer. A Spanish multicenter study.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Franco S; Torné A; Benito V; Hernández A; Lago V; Rovira R; Acosta Ú; Agustí N; Gil-Moreno A;
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 158(2):287-293. PubMed ID: 32467055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy as a diagnostic procedure for lymph node recurrence of gynaecological cancers.
Sanjuán A; Illa M; Torné A; Román SM; Jurado M; Lejarcegui JA; Pahisa J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(4):491-5. PubMed ID: 17486474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center.
Cardenas-Goicoechea J; Adams S; Bhat SB; Randall TC
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 May; 117(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 20144471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection: analysis of the first 100 cases.
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Sep; 82(3):498-503. PubMed ID: 11520146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparotomy for infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: A randomised controlled trial.
Salehi S; Åvall-Lundqvist E; Legerstam B; Carlson JW; Falconer H
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 79():81-89. PubMed ID: 28463759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study.
Akand M; Erdogru T; Avci E; Ates M
Int J Urol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):916-21. PubMed ID: 26212891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Long-term outcome of patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer after pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection: a comparison of laparoscopic vs. open procedure.
Papathemelis T; Oppermann H; Grafl S; Gerken M; Pauer A; Scharl S; Scharl A; Inwald E; Ignatov A; Ortmann O; Klinkhammer-Schalke M; Hein A; Beckmann MW; Lux MP
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2020 Apr; 146(4):961-969. PubMed ID: 31901975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Comparison of transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy: randomized experimental study].
Occelli B; Narducci F; Lanvin D; Coste E; Legoupils E; Castelain B; Querleu D
Ann Chir; 2000 Jan; 125(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 10921179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
