300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33160846)
1. Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer after negative prostate biopsy: The current value of microscopic findings.
Morote J; Schwartzman I; Borque A; Esteban LM; Celma A; Roche S; de Torres IM; Mast R; Semidey ME; Regis L; Santamaría A; Planas J; Trilla E
Urol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):432.e11-432.e19. PubMed ID: 33160846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The current value of histological findings in negative prostate biopsies to predict the future risk of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Schwartzmann I; Celma A; Regis L; Planas J; Roche S; de Torres IM; Semidey ME; Morote J
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2021; 45(6):447-454. PubMed ID: 34140257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The current recommendation for the management of isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.
Morote J; Schwartzmann I; Celma A; Roche S; de Torres IM; Mast R; Semidey ME; Regis L; Santamaria A; Planas J; Trilla E
BJU Int; 2022 May; 129(5):627-633. PubMed ID: 34375498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In Search for risk predictors at the microscopic scenario of a negative biopsy. A systematic review.
Schwartzmann I; Celma A; Gallardo I; Moreno O; Regis L; Placer J; Planas J; Trilla Herrero E; Morote Robles J
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2019 Sep; 43(7):337-347. PubMed ID: 31109736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) on extended prostatic biopsies: predictive factors of cancer detection on repeat biopsies.
Scattoni V; Roscigno M; Freschi M; Dehò F; Raber M; Briganti A; Fantini G; Nava L; Montorsi F; Rigatti P
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2005 Mar; 77(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15906787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A 4K score/MRI-based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer, clinically significant prostate cancer, and unfavorable prostate cancer.
Wagaskar VG; Sobotka S; Ratnani P; Young J; Lantz A; Parekh S; Falagario UG; Li L; Lewis S; Haines K; Punnen S; Wiklund P; Tewari A
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2021 Aug; 4(4):e1357. PubMed ID: 33661541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer: What's Next?
Panebianco V; Barchetti G; Simone G; Del Monte M; Ciardi A; Grompone MD; Campa R; Indino EL; Barchetti F; Sciarra A; Leonardo C; Gallucci M; Catalano C
Eur Urol; 2018 Jul; 74(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 29566957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. There Is No Way to Avoid Systematic Prostate Biopsies in Addition to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsies.
Dell'Oglio P; Stabile A; Soligo M; Brembilla G; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Bravi CA; Dehò F; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Karnes RJ; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Feb; 3(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 31411973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia with adjacent small atypical glands on prostate biopsy.
Kronz JD; Shaikh AA; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2001 Apr; 32(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 11331955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Not All Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies Are Equal: The Impact of the Type of Approach and Operator Expertise on the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Dehò F; Scattoni V; Maga T; Losa A; Gaboardi F; Cardone G; Esposito A; De Cobelli F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 31100235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The incidence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical glands suspicious for carcinoma on first-time saturation needle biopsy, and the subsequent risk of cancer.
Schoenfield L; Jones JS; Zippe CD; Reuther AM; Klein E; Zhou M; Magi-Galluzzi C
BJU Int; 2007 Apr; 99(4):770-4. PubMed ID: 17233800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel.
Moldovan PC; Van den Broeck T; Sylvester R; Marconi L; Bellmunt J; van den Bergh RCN; Bolla M; Briers E; Cumberbatch MG; Fossati N; Gross T; Henry AM; Joniau S; van der Kwast TH; Matveev VB; van der Poel HG; De Santis M; Schoots IG; Wiegel T; Yuan CY; Cornford P; Mottet N; Lam TB; Rouvière O
Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):250-266. PubMed ID: 28336078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Expression of ERG protein, a prostate cancer specific marker, in high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN): lack of utility to stratify cancer risks associated with HGPIN.
He H; Osunkoya AO; Carver P; Falzarano S; Klein E; Magi-Galluzzi C; Zhou M
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E751-5. PubMed ID: 23046279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Significance of atypical small acinar proliferation and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in prostate biopsy in China].
Yang MG; Xu ZQ
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2021 Sep; 27(9):798-802. PubMed ID: 34914255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The "Is mpMRI Enough" or IMRIE Study: A Multicentre Evaluation of Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared with Biopsy.
Stonier T; Simson N; Shah T; Lobo N; Amer T; Lee SM; Bass E; Chau E; Grey A; McCartan N; Acher P; Ahmad I; Arumainayagam N; Brown D; Chapman A; Elf D; Hartington T; Ibrahim I; Leung H; Liyanage S; Lovegrove C; Malthouse T; Mateen B; Mistry K; Morrison I; Nalagatla S; Persad R; Pope A; Sokhi H; Syed H; Tadtayev S; Tharmaratnam M; Qteishat A; Miah S; Emberton M; Moore C; Walton T; Eddy B; Ahmed HU
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):1027-1034. PubMed ID: 33046412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Widespread high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on biopsy predicts the risk of prostate cancer: a 12 months analysis after three consecutive prostate biopsies.
De Nunzio C; Albisinni S; Cicione A; Gacci M; Leonardo C; Esperto F; Tubaro A
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2013 Jun; 85(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 23820650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnosis of isolated high-grade prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia: proposal of a nomogram for the prediction of cancer detection at saturation re-biopsy.
Roscigno M; Scattoni V; Freschi M; Abdollah F; Maccagnano C; Galosi A; Lacetera V; Montironi R; Muzzonigro G; Deho F; Deiana G; Belussi D; Chinaglia D; Montorsi F; Da Pozzo LF
BJU Int; 2012 May; 109(9):1329-34. PubMed ID: 21895935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
