These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Aghaloo TL; Moy PK Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22 Suppl():49-70. PubMed ID: 18437791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical efficacy of grafting materials in alveolar ridge augmentation: A systematic review. Troeltzsch M; Troeltzsch M; Kauffmann P; Gruber R; Brockmeyer P; Moser N; Rau A; Schliephake H J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 44(10):1618-1629. PubMed ID: 27622971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The clinical efficacy of autogenous dentin blocks prepared chairside for alveolar ridge augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mahardawi B; Kyaw TT; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Oct; 34(10):1025-1037. PubMed ID: 37461220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lateral Ridge Augmentation Using Autogenous Block Grafts and Guided Bone Regeneration: A 10-Year Prospective Case Series Study. Chappuis V; Cavusoglu Y; Buser D; von Arx T Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 19(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 27476677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maxillary tuberosity block bone graft: innovative technique and case report. Tolstunov L J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1723-9. PubMed ID: 19615588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dimensional alterations following vertical ridge augmentation using collagen membrane and three types of bone grafting materials: A retrospective observational study. Park YH; Choi SH; Cho KS; Lee JS Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Aug; 19(4):742-749. PubMed ID: 28556452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implants - a Cochrane systematic review. Esposito M; Grusovin MG; Felice P; Karatzopoulos G; Worthington HV; Coulthard P Eur J Oral Implantol; 2009; 2(3):167-84. PubMed ID: 20467628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized, controlled clinical two-centre study using xenogeneic block grafts loaded with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 or autogenous bone blocks for lateral ridge augmentation. Thoma DS; Payer M; Jakse N; Bienz SP; Hüsler J; Schmidlin PR; Jung UW; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Feb; 45(2):265-276. PubMed ID: 29150957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical outcomes following atrophic alveolar ridge reconstruction using collagenated xenogeneic bone block or autogenous bone block: One-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical. Romito GA; Fonseca MA; Soares HH; de Oliveira Lazarin R; Sapata VM; Nishyama R; Conde MC; Hammerle CHF; Schwarz F; Villar CC J Clin Periodontol; 2024 Jan; 51(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 37846853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Autogenous dentin block versus bone block for horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation and staged implant placement: A randomized controlled clinical trial including histologic assessment. Elraee L; Abdel Gaber HK; Elsayed HH; Adel-Khattab D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Jul; 33(7):723-734. PubMed ID: 35509125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lateral ridge augmentation with Bio-Oss alone or Bio-Oss mixed with particulate autogenous bone graft: a systematic review. Aludden HC; Mordenfeld A; Hallman M; Dahlin C; Jensen T Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Aug; 46(8):1030-1038. PubMed ID: 28366452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Autogenous bone block versus collagenated xenogeneic bone block in the reconstruction of the atrophic alveolar ridge: A non-inferiority randomized clinical trial. Romito GA; Villar CC; Sapata VM; Soares HH; Fonseca MA; Conde M; Hammerle CHF; Schwarz F J Clin Periodontol; 2022 Nov; 49(11):1158-1168. PubMed ID: 35833539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone augmentation using autogenous bone versus biomaterial in the posterior region of atrophic mandibles: A systematic review and meta-analysis. de Sousa CA; Lemos CAA; Santiago-Júnior JF; Faverani LP; Pellizzer EP J Dent; 2018 Sep; 76():1-8. PubMed ID: 29959062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with Xenogenic Block Grafts Compared with Autogenous Bone Block Grafts for Implant-retained Rehabilitation: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Christensen JG; Grønlund GP; Georgi SR; Starch-Jensen T; Bruun NH; Jensen SS J Oral Maxillofac Res; 2023; 14(2):e1. PubMed ID: 37521322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Wallace SS; Froum SJ Ann Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 8(1):328-43. PubMed ID: 14971260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional block grafts: bone from the iliac crest versus bovine anorganic bone. Felice P; Marchetti C; Piattelli A; Pellegrino G; Checchi V; Worthington H; Esposito M Eur J Oral Implantol; 2008; 1(3):183-98. PubMed ID: 20467621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of ramus autogenous block grafts for vertical alveolar ridge augmentation and implant placement: a pilot study. Proussaefs P; Lozada J; Kleinman A; Rohrer MD Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 11958407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]