348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33162076)
1. Bias in genomic predictions by mating practices for linear type traits in a large-scale genomic evaluation.
Tsuruta S; Lawlor TJ; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jan; 104(1):662-677. PubMed ID: 33162076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Controlling bias in genomic breeding values for young genotyped bulls.
Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):9956-9970. PubMed ID: 31495630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.
Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5194-5206. PubMed ID: 29573806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of single-step single nucleotide polymorphism best linear unbiased predictor model with unknown-parent groups for type traits in Japanese Holsteins.
Osawa T; Masuda Y; Saburi J; Hirumachi K
J Dairy Sci; 2023 Jul; 106(7):4847-4859. PubMed ID: 37268563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are evaluations on young genotyped animals benefiting from the past generations?
Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Lawlor TJ; Forni S; Weller JI
J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3930-42. PubMed ID: 24679931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of using cow genomic information on accuracy and bias of genomic breeding values in a simulated Holstein dairy cattle population.
Dehnavi E; Mahyari SA; Schenkel FS; Sargolzaei M
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5166-5176. PubMed ID: 29605309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correcting for base-population differences and unknown parent groups in single-step genomic predictions of Norwegian Red cattle.
Belay TK; Eikje LS; Gjuvsland AB; Nordbø Ø; Tribout T; Meuwissen T
J Anim Sci; 2022 Sep; 100(9):. PubMed ID: 35752161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiple-trait genomic evaluation of linear type traits using genomic and phenotypic data in US Holsteins.
Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Aguilar I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):4198-204. PubMed ID: 21787955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Practical implications for genetic modeling in the genomics era.
VanRaden PM
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):2405-2412. PubMed ID: 26778313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of evaluation bias caused by genomic preselection.
Tyrisevä AM; Mäntysaari EA; Jakobsen J; Aamand GP; Dürr J; Fikse WF; Lidauer MH
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Apr; 101(4):3155-3163. PubMed ID: 29397162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in genetic trends in US dairy cattle since the implementation of genomic selection.
Guinan FL; Wiggans GR; Norman HD; Dürr JW; Cole JB; Van Tassell CP; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Dairy Sci; 2023 Feb; 106(2):1110-1129. PubMed ID: 36494224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Including overseas performance information in genomic evaluations of Australian dairy cattle.
Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Schrooten C; Hayes BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2015 May; 98(5):3443-59. PubMed ID: 25771052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mating programs including genomic relationships and dominance effects.
Sun C; VanRaden PM; O'Connell JR; Weigel KA; Gianola D
J Dairy Sci; 2013; 96(12):8014-23. PubMed ID: 24119810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimization of a genomic breeding program for a moderately sized dairy cattle population.
Reiner-Benaim A; Ezra E; Weller JI
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Apr; 100(4):2892-2904. PubMed ID: 28189326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Symposium review: Single-step genomic evaluations in dairy cattle.
Mäntysaari EA; Koivula M; Strandén I
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jun; 103(6):5314-5326. PubMed ID: 32331883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assigning unknown parent groups to reduce bias in genomic evaluations of final score in US Holsteins.
Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Lourenco DA; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Sep; 97(9):5814-21. PubMed ID: 24997668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A mating advice system in dairy cattle incorporating genomic information.
Carthy TR; McCarthy J; Berry DP
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8210-8220. PubMed ID: 31229287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using genomics to enhance selection of novel traits in North American dairy cattle.
Chesnais JP; Cooper TA; Wiggans GR; Sargolzaei M; Pryce JE; Miglior F
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):2413-2427. PubMed ID: 26778318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assortative mating biases marker-based heritability estimators.
Border R; O'Rourke S; de Candia T; Goddard ME; Visscher PM; Yengo L; Jones M; Keller MC
Nat Commun; 2022 Feb; 13(1):660. PubMed ID: 35115518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
