349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33162076)
21. Removing data and using metafounders alleviates biases for all traits in Lacaune dairy sheep predictions.
Macedo FL; Astruc JM; Meuwissen THE; Legarra A
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Mar; 105(3):2439-2452. PubMed ID: 35033343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Genetic analysis of semen production traits of Japanese Black and Holstein bulls: genome-wide marker-based estimation of genetic parameters and environmental effect trends.
Atagi Y; Onogi A; Kinukawa M; Ogino A; Kurogi K; Uchiyama K; Yasumori T; Adachi K; Togashi K; Iwata H
J Anim Sci; 2017 May; 95(5):1900-1912. PubMed ID: 28727006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Temporal dynamics of genetic parameters and SNP effects for performance and disorder traits in poultry undergoing genomic selection.
Richter J; Hidalgo J; Bussiman F; Breen V; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2024 Jan; 102():. PubMed ID: 38576313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Improving accuracy of bulls' predicted genomic breeding values for fertility using daughters' milk progesterone profiles.
Tenghe AMM; Bouwman AC; Berglund B; de Koning DJ; Veerkamp RF
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5177-5193. PubMed ID: 29525306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Genetic gain and inbreeding from simulation of different genomic mating schemes for pig improvement.
Zhao F; Zhang P; Wang X; Akdemir D; Garrick D; He J; Wang L
J Anim Sci Biotechnol; 2023 Jun; 14(1):87. PubMed ID: 37309010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Mating structures for genomic selection breeding programs in aquaculture.
Sonesson AK; Ødegård J
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):46. PubMed ID: 27342705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Study of stayability in Nellore cows using a threshold model.
Van Melis MH; Eler JP; Oliveira HN; Rosa GJ; Silva JA; Ferraz JB; Pereira E
J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1780-6. PubMed ID: 17371792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.
Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Ezra E; Ron M; Shirak A; Weller JI
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1742-52. PubMed ID: 24472123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Efficient ways to combine data from broiler and layer chickens to account for sequential genomic selection.
Hidalgo J; Lourenco D; Tsuruta S; Bermann M; Breen V; Herring W; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37249185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Short communication: Single-step genomic evaluation of milk production traits using multiple-trait random regression model in Chinese Holsteins.
Kang H; Ning C; Zhou L; Zhang S; Yan Q; Liu JF
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Dec; 101(12):11143-11149. PubMed ID: 30268613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Implementation of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor for US Holsteins with a large number of genotyped animals.
Masuda Y; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Legarra A; Aguilar I; Lourenco DAL; Fragomeni BO; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):1968-1974. PubMed ID: 26805987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Genomic prediction for hastening and improving efficiency of forward selection in conifer polycross mating designs: an example from white spruce.
Lenz PRN; Nadeau S; Azaiez A; Gérardi S; Deslauriers M; Perron M; Isabel N; Beaulieu J; Bousquet J
Heredity (Edinb); 2020 Apr; 124(4):562-578. PubMed ID: 31969718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix.
Tiezzi F; Maltecca C
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Variance components using genomic information for 2 functional traits in Italian Simmental cattle: Calving interval and lactation persistency.
Cesarani A; Gaspa G; Masuda Y; Degano L; Vicario D; Lourenco DAL; Macciotta NPP
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jun; 103(6):5227-5233. PubMed ID: 32278560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Review: Opportunities and challenges for small populations of dairy cattle in the era of genomics.
Schöpke K; Swalve HH
Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1050-60. PubMed ID: 26957010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Single-step genomic model improved reliability and reduced the bias of genomic predictions in Danish Jersey.
Ma P; Lund MS; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Su G
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Dec; 98(12):9026-34. PubMed ID: 26433415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Predicted accuracy of and response to genomic selection for new traits in dairy cattle.
Calus MP; de Haas Y; Pszczola M; Veerkamp RF
Animal; 2013 Feb; 7(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 23031684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Genomic evaluation of a relatively small dairy cattle population by combination with a larger population.
Weller JI; Stoop WM; Eding H; Schrooten C; Ezra E
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4945-55. PubMed ID: 25935250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Beef trait genetic parameters based on old and recent data and its implications for genomic predictions in Italian Simmental cattle.
Cesarani A; Hidalgo J; Garcia A; Degano L; Vicario D; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2020 Aug; 98(8):. PubMed ID: 32730571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
