These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3316289)

  • 1. Evaluation of Mast-ID 15 system for identifying Enterobacteriaceae, some Vibrionaceae, and Acinetobacter.
    Holmes B; Dawson CA
    J Clin Pathol; 1987 Oct; 40(10):1168-73. PubMed ID: 3316289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the Minitek system.
    Holmes B; Humphry PS
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1988 Feb; 64(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 3286596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the Phoenix 100 ID/AST system and NID panel for identification of Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae, and commonly isolated nonenteric gram-negative bacilli.
    O'Hara CM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 44(3):928-33. PubMed ID: 16517878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Mast-ID 15 system for identification of fresh clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter.
    Shakespeare AP; Megson GM; Jones PA; Drucker DB; Keaney MG; Ganguli LA
    J Clin Pathol; 1992 Feb; 45(2):168-70. PubMed ID: 1541700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a small "conventional" identification system for fermentative gramnegative rods using a computerized data base.
    Siegrist HH; Altwegg M; Wenger A; Isenrich H; von Graevenitz A
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A; 1987 Oct; 266(3-4):370-8. PubMed ID: 3326369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the L-pyrrolidonyl-beta-naphthylamide hydrolysis test for the differentiation of members of the families Enterobacteriaceae and Vibrionaceae.
    Chagla AH; Borczyk AA; Aldom JE; Dalla Rosa S; Cole DD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Jul; 31(7):1946-8. PubMed ID: 8349781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differentiation of Enterobacteriaceae and Vibrionaceae by a micromethod for determination of carbon substrate assimilation.
    Freney J; Laban P; Desmonceaux M; Gayral JP; Fleurette J
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A; 1984 Dec; 258(2-3):187-97. PubMed ID: 6397943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of the Roche Cobas IDA and Enterotube II systems for identifying members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Holmes B
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 May; 27(5):1027-30. PubMed ID: 2663910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fatty acid patterns in the classification of some representatives of the families Enterobacteriaceae and Vibrionaceae.
    Bøe B; Gjerde J
    J Gen Microbiol; 1980 Jan; 116(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 7365455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Numerical taxonomy analysis of bacteria isolated from the completed 'most probable numbers' test for coliform bacilli.
    Austin B; Hussong D; Weiner RM; Colwell RR
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1981 Aug; 51(1):101-12. PubMed ID: 7024232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Rapid method of carrying out the Voges-Proskauer and methyl red reactions using paper indicator systems].
    Nosov NN
    Lab Delo; 1984; (6):371-2. PubMed ID: 6206296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Minitek system for identification of nonfermentative and nonenteric fermentative Gram-negative bacteria.
    Chester V; Cleary TJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Oct; 12(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 6999019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Four hour identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the API Rapid 20E and Micro-ID systems.
    Holmes B; Humphry PS
    J Clin Pathol; 1985 Oct; 38(10):1132-8. PubMed ID: 3902898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ribosomal RNA phylogenies for the vibrio-enteric group of eubacteria.
    MacDonell MT; Swartz DG; Ortiz-Conde BA; Last GA; Colwell RR
    Microbiol Sci; 1986 Jun; 3(6):172-5, 178. PubMed ID: 2484672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation of the usefulness of commercial systems Quantum II and Rapid ID 32E for quick identification of rods from the Enterobacteriaceae family].
    Kałuzewski S
    Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 1994; 46(4):247-58. PubMed ID: 7603126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The IP 85 identification program for G-intestinal rods].
    Zampach P; Zampachová E
    Cesk Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol; 1988 Nov; 37(6):336-9. PubMed ID: 3203387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of Enterobacteriaceae by the API 20E system.
    Holmes B; Willcox WR; Lapage SP
    J Clin Pathol; 1978 Jan; 31(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 342546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Nutrition and taxonomy of "enterobacteriaceae" and related bacteria. III. Nutritional characters and differentiation of the taxonomic groups (author's transl)].
    Véron M; Le Minor L
    Ann Microbiol (Paris); 1975 Sep; 126(2):125-47. PubMed ID: 1217784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differentiation of gram negative rods other than Enterobacteriaceae and Vibrionaceae by a micromethod for determination of carbon substrate assimilation.
    Freney J; Laban P; Desmonceaux M; Gayral JP; Fleurette J
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A; 1984 Dec; 258(2-3):198-212. PubMed ID: 6397944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pyrosequencing analysis of the gyrB gene to differentiate bacteria responsible for diarrheal diseases.
    Hou XL; Cao QY; Jia HY; Chen Z
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2008 Jul; 27(7):587-96. PubMed ID: 18324428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.