285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33163189)
21. Comparison of tissue and molecular yield between fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA): a randomized study.
Asokkumar R; Yung Ka C; Loh T; Kah Ling L; Gek San T; Ying H; Tan D; Khor C; Lim T; Soetikno R
Endosc Int Open; 2019 Aug; 7(8):E955-E963. PubMed ID: 31367675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Cheng B; Zhang Y; Chen Q; Sun B; Deng Z; Shan H; Dou L; Wang J; Li Y; Yang X; Jiang T; Xu G; Wang G
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1314-1321. PubMed ID: 28733257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A randomized controlled cross-over trial and cost analysis comparing endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy.
Aadam AA; Wani S; Amick A; Shah JN; Bhat YM; Hamerski CM; Klapman JB; Muthusamy VR; Watson RR; Rademaker AW; Keswani RN; Keefer L; Das A; Komanduri S
Endosc Int Open; 2016 May; 4(5):E497-505. PubMed ID: 27227104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses.
de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Hathorn KE; Madruga-Neto AC; Lee LS; Thompson CC
Endosc Int Open; 2020 Jun; 8(6):E738-E747. PubMed ID: 32490158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Biopsy versus Fine-Needle Aspiration for Tissue Sampling of Abdominal Lymph Nodes: A Propensity Score Matched Multicenter Comparative Study.
Facciorusso A; Crinò SF; Muscatiello N; Gkolfakis P; Samanta J; Londoño Castillo J; Cotsoglou C; Ramai D
Cancers (Basel); 2021 Aug; 13(17):. PubMed ID: 34503112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Does ProCore Fine-Needle Biopsy Really Improve the Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Sampling of Pancreatic Masses?
Delconte G; Cavalcoli F; Magarotto A; Centonze G; Bezzio C; Cattaneo L; Rausa E; Kelly ME; Bonitta G; Milione M; Enzo M
Dig Dis; 2022; 40(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 33780932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Comparative Analysis of 25 Gauge
Siddique DA; Rahal MA; Trevino K; Wu HH; Al-Haddad MA
Anticancer Res; 2020 Oct; 40(10):5845-5851. PubMed ID: 32988914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for preoperative pancreatic solid lesions.
Fujita A; Ryozawa S; Tanisaka Y; Ogawa T; Suzuki M; Katsuda H; Tashima T; Araki R; Mizuide M
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2021 Feb; 56(2):188-192. PubMed ID: 33295211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison between two types of needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine aspiration biopsy of pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal masses.
Alkhateeb K; Lee BB; Alatassi H; Sanders MA; Omer EM; McClave SA; Fraig M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Mar; 48(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 31850666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid mass lesions of the pancreas: A retrospective comparison study of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy.
Sweeney J; Soong L; Goyal A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Apr; 48(4):322-329. PubMed ID: 31903736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB in Pancreatic Solid Lesions ≤ 15 mm.
Conti Bellocchi MC; Bernuzzi M; Brillo A; Bernardoni L; Amodio A; De Pretis N; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Crinò SF
Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 Feb; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 38396466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of the lung masses: a multicenter experience with fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy needles.
Mangiavillano B; Spatola F; Facciorusso A; De Nucci G; Ligresti D; Henry Eusebi L; Lisotti A; Auriemma F; Lamonaca L; Paduano D; Crinò S; Scarlata S; Troncone E; Del Vecchio Blanco G; Manes G; Traina M; Bertani A; Ofosu A; Binda C; Fabbri C; Muscatiello N; Fusaroli P; Repici A; Carrara S
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Jul; 34(7):757-762. PubMed ID: 35482928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic performance and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy for gallbladder lesions.
Kuraishi Y; Hara K; Haba S; Kuwahara T; Okuno N; Yanaidani T; Ishikawa S; Yasuda T; Yamada M; Fukui T; Mizuno N
Dig Endosc; 2024 Feb; 36(2):206-214. PubMed ID: 37186389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparing per-pass performance of 2 types of needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of pancreatobiliary masses in a randomized trial.
Mohamadnejad M; Mirzaie V; Sotoudeh M; Nikmanesh A; Hosseini R; Muthusamy R
Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Sep; 98(3):371-380. PubMed ID: 37098399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Needles Provide Higher Diagnostic Yield Compared to Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Needles When Sampling Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Meta-Analysis.
Renelus BD; Jamorabo DS; Boston I; Briggs WM; Poneros JM
Clin Endosc; 2021 Mar; 54(2):261-268. PubMed ID: 32892519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Fine-Needle Aspiration and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Fine-Needle Biopsy for Solid Lesions in a Multicenter, Randomized Trial.
Nagula S; Pourmand K; Aslanian H; Bucobo JC; Gonda TA; Gonzalez S; Goodman A; Gross SA; Ho S; DiMaio CJ; Kim MK; Pais S; Poneros JM; Robbins DH; Schnoll-Sussman F; Sethi A; Buscaglia JM;
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1307-1313.e1. PubMed ID: 28624647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
Kandel P; Nassar A; Gomez V; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Crook JE; Fares NS; Wallace MB
Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 32767288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dry suction versus wet suction technique of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
Xu S; Wang J; Guo J; Xie F; Qiao W; Meng Y; Peng P; Hu H; Huang Y; Liu S; Qin M; Yao J; Li Y
Trials; 2023 Dec; 24(1):805. PubMed ID: 38093381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration and Fine-Needle Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
Ayres LR; Kmiotek EK; Lam E; Telford JJ
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018; 2018():1415062. PubMed ID: 29850451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
