148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33164053)
1. DeepSSV: detecting somatic small variants in paired tumor and normal sequencing data with convolutional neural network.
Meng J; Victor B; He Z; Liu H; Jiang T
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33164053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DNN-Boost: Somatic mutation identification of tumor-only whole-exome sequencing data using deep neural network and XGBoost.
Maruf FA; Pratama R; Song G
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2021 Dec; 19(6):2140017. PubMed ID: 34895111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deep convolutional neural networks for accurate somatic mutation detection.
Sahraeian SME; Liu R; Lau B; Podesta K; Mohiyuddin M; Lam HYK
Nat Commun; 2019 Mar; 10(1):1041. PubMed ID: 30833567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Integrated approach to generate artificial samples with low tumor fraction for somatic variant calling benchmarking.
Sergi A; Beltrame L; Marchini S; Masseroli M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 May; 25(1):180. PubMed ID: 38720249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A universal SNP and small-indel variant caller using deep neural networks.
Poplin R; Chang PC; Alexander D; Schwartz S; Colthurst T; Ku A; Newburger D; Dijamco J; Nguyen N; Afshar PT; Gross SS; Dorfman L; McLean CY; DePristo MA
Nat Biotechnol; 2018 Nov; 36(10):983-987. PubMed ID: 30247488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. SNooPer: a machine learning-based method for somatic variant identification from low-pass next-generation sequencing.
Spinella JF; Mehanna P; Vidal R; Saillour V; Cassart P; Richer C; Ouimet M; Healy J; Sinnett D
BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):912. PubMed ID: 27842494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DeepSom: a CNN-based approach to somatic variant calling in WGS samples without a matched normal.
Vilov S; Heinig M
Bioinformatics; 2023 Jan; 39(1):. PubMed ID: 36637201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. cnnLSV: detecting structural variants by encoding long-read alignment information and convolutional neural network.
Ma H; Zhong C; Chen D; He H; Yang F
BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 Mar; 24(1):119. PubMed ID: 36977976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A database of simulated tumor genomes towards accurate detection of somatic small variants in cancer.
Meng J; Chen YP
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202982. PubMed ID: 30161165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Nine Somatic Variant Callers for Detection of Somatic Mutations in Exome and Targeted Deep Sequencing Data.
Krøigård AB; Thomassen M; Lænkholm AV; Kruse TA; Larsen MJ
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151664. PubMed ID: 27002637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating somatic tumor mutation detection without matched normal samples.
Teer JK; Zhang Y; Chen L; Welsh EA; Cress WD; Eschrich SA; Berglund AE
Hum Genomics; 2017 Sep; 11(1):22. PubMed ID: 28870239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Individualized Approach for Somatic Variant Discovery.
Li M; He T; Cao C; Long Q
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2120():11-36. PubMed ID: 32124309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. GASOLINE: detecting germline and somatic structural variants from long-reads data.
Magi A; Mattei G; Mingrino A; Caprioli C; Ronchini C; Frigè G; Semeraro R; Baragli M; Bolognini D; Colombo E; Mazzarella L; Pelicci PG
Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20817. PubMed ID: 38012350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DeepSV: accurate calling of genomic deletions from high-throughput sequencing data using deep convolutional neural network.
Cai L; Wu Y; Gao J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):665. PubMed ID: 31830921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample.
Sahraeian SME; Fang LT; Karagiannis K; Moos M; Smith S; Santana-Quintero L; Xiao C; Colgan M; Hong H; Mohiyuddin M; Xiao W
Genome Biol; 2022 Jan; 23(1):12. PubMed ID: 34996510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A deep dive into understanding tumor foci classification using multiparametric MRI based on convolutional neural network.
Zong W; Lee JK; Liu C; Carver EN; Feldman AM; Janic B; Elshaikh MA; Pantelic MV; Hearshen D; Chetty IJ; Movsas B; Wen N
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):4077-4086. PubMed ID: 32449176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. SVEngine: an efficient and versatile simulator of genome structural variations with features of cancer clonal evolution.
Xia LC; Ai D; Lee H; Andor N; Li C; Zhang NR; Ji HP
Gigascience; 2018 Jul; 7(7):. PubMed ID: 29982625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lean and deep models for more accurate filtering of SNP and INDEL variant calls.
Friedman S; Gauthier L; Farjoun Y; Banks E
Bioinformatics; 2020 Apr; 36(7):2060-2067. PubMed ID: 31830260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving somatic exome sequencing performance by biological replicates.
Cebeci YE; Erturk RA; Ergun MA; Baysan M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Mar; 25(1):124. PubMed ID: 38519906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of genetic variants from NGS data using deep convolutional neural networks.
Vaisband M; Schubert M; Gassner FJ; Geisberger R; Greil R; Zaborsky N; Hasenauer J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 Apr; 24(1):158. PubMed ID: 37081386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
