BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33164130)

  • 1. Car expertise does not compete with face expertise during ensemble coding.
    Sun J; Gauthier I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Apr; 83(3):1275-1281. PubMed ID: 33164130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Irrelevant objects of expertise compete with faces during visual search.
    McGugin RW; McKeeff TJ; Tong F; Gauthier I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):309-17. PubMed ID: 21264705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expertise increases the functional overlap between face and object perception.
    McKeeff TJ; McGugin RW; Tong F; Gauthier I
    Cognition; 2010 Dec; 117(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 20933227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of category- and exemplar-specific experience in ensemble processing of objects.
    Cha O; Blake R; Gauthier I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Apr; 83(3):1080-1093. PubMed ID: 33078383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are all types of expertise created equal? Car experts use different spatial frequency scales for subordinate categorization of cars and faces.
    Harel A; Bentin S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e67024. PubMed ID: 23826188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association and dissociation between detection and discrimination of objects of expertise: Evidence from visual search.
    Golan T; Bentin S; DeGutis JM; Robertson LC; Harel A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Feb; 76(2):391-406. PubMed ID: 24338355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual search for complex objects: Set-size effects for faces, words and cars.
    Hemström J; Albonico A; Djouab S; Barton JJS
    Vision Res; 2019 Sep; 162():8-19. PubMed ID: 31233767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The temporal advantage for individuating objects of expertise: perceptual expertise is an early riser.
    Curby KM; Gauthier I
    J Vis; 2009 Jun; 9(6):7.1-13. PubMed ID: 19761298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual expertise with pictures of cars correlates with RT magnitude of the car inversion effect.
    Rossion B; Curran T
    Perception; 2010; 39(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 20402240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Expertise Effects in Face-Selective Areas are Robust to Clutter and Diverted Attention, but not to Competition.
    McGugin RW; Van Gulick AE; Tamber-Rosenau BJ; Ross DA; Gauthier I
    Cereb Cortex; 2015 Sep; 25(9):2610-22. PubMed ID: 24682187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ensemble coding of facial identity is not refined by experience: Evidence from other-race and inverted faces.
    Davis EE; Matthews CM; Mondloch CJ
    Br J Psychol; 2021 Feb; 112(1):265-281. PubMed ID: 32740911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring pattern recognition: what is the relationship between the recognition of words, faces and other objects?
    Maratos FA; Chu K; Lipka S; Stupple EJN; Parente F
    Cogn Process; 2023 Feb; 24(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 36376612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-resolution Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveals Configural Processing of Cars in Right Anterior Fusiform Face Area of Car Experts.
    Ross DA; Tamber-Rosenau BJ; Palmeri TJ; Zhang J; Xu Y; Gauthier I
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Jul; 30(7):973-984. PubMed ID: 29561239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Cambridge Car Memory Test: a task matched in format to the Cambridge Face Memory Test, with norms, reliability, sex differences, dissociations from face memory, and expertise effects.
    Dennett HW; McKone E; Tavashmi R; Hall A; Pidcock M; Edwards M; Duchaine B
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):587-605. PubMed ID: 22012343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are Face and Object Recognition Independent? A Neurocomputational Modeling Exploration.
    Wang P; Gauthier I; Cottrell G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 28(4):558-74. PubMed ID: 26741802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term expertise with artificial objects increases visual competition with early face categorization processes.
    Rossion B; Collins D; Goffaux V; Curran T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Mar; 19(3):543-55. PubMed ID: 17335400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition.
    Gauthier I; Skudlarski P; Gore JC; Anderson AW
    Nat Neurosci; 2000 Feb; 3(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 10649576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Vanderbilt Expertise Test reveals domain-general and domain-specific sex effects in object recognition.
    McGugin RW; Richler JJ; Herzmann G; Speegle M; Gauthier I
    Vision Res; 2012 Sep; 69():10-22. PubMed ID: 22877929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experience moderates overlap between object and face recognition, suggesting a common ability.
    Gauthier I; McGugin RW; Richler JJ; Herzmann G; Speegle M; Van Gulick AE
    J Vis; 2014 Jul; 14(8):7. PubMed ID: 24993021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Domain specificity versus expertise: factors influencing distinct processing of faces.
    Carmel D; Bentin S
    Cognition; 2002 Feb; 83(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 11814484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.