170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33165720)
21. Retrospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Cai J; Yang L; Dong W; Wang H; Xiong Z; Wang Z
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jan; 132(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 26434669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Open versus laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in early stage cervical cancer: no difference in surgical or disease outcome.
van de Lande J; von Mensdorff-Pouilly S; Lettinga RG; Piek JM; Verheijen RH
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 21857347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.
Kavallaris A; Chalvatzas N; Gkoutzioulis A; Zygouris D
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 303(4):1039-1047. PubMed ID: 33068159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Curative effect analysis of postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy on early-stage cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors].
Tang Q; Tu YQ; Chen JH; Lyu XJ; Yan DD
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 40(6):462-466. PubMed ID: 29936774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Prognosis of bulky pTIIB cervical cancer treated by radical hysterectomy comparing adenocarcinoma with squamous cell carcinoma using propensity score matching.
Okadome M; Nagayama R; Shimokawa M; Sonoda K; Shimamoto K; Saito T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 153(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 33119174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Outcome of international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IIb cervical cancer from 2003 to 2012: an evaluation of treatments and prognosis: a retrospective study.
Guo L; Liu X; Wang L; Sun H; Huang K; Li X; Tang F; Li S; Yuan X; Wang C
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jun; 25(5):910-8. PubMed ID: 25867278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Recurrence Rates in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Abdominal Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review Study.
Uppal S; Gehrig PA; Peng K; Bixel KL; Matsuo K; Vetter MH; Davidson BA; Cisa MP; Lees BF; Brunette LL; Tucker K; Stuart Staley A; Gotlieb WH; Holloway RW; Essel KG; Holman LL; Goldfeld E; Olawaiye A; Rose SL
J Clin Oncol; 2020 Apr; 38(10):1030-1040. PubMed ID: 32031867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Completion surgery after concomitant chemoradiation in locally advanced cervical cancer: a comprehensive analysis of pattern of postoperative complications.
Ferrandina G; Ercoli A; Fagotti A; Fanfani F; Gallotta V; Margariti AP; Salerno MG; Chiantera V; Legge F; Macchia G; Morganti AG; Valentini V; Scambia G
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 May; 21(5):1692-9. PubMed ID: 24407316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Lymph Node Ratio Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy.
Kim SI; Kim TH; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Lee TS; Jeon HW; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Yonsei Med J; 2021 Mar; 62(3):231-239. PubMed ID: 33635013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Robotic Surgery Compared With Laparoscopic and Abdominal Surgery in the Management of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
Corrado G; Cutillo G; Saltari M; Mancini E; Sindico S; Vici P; Sergi D; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Pomati G; Baiocco E; Vizza E
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):539-46. PubMed ID: 26825826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Type B versus Type C Radical Hysterectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.
Panici PB; Di Donato V; Palaia I; Visentin VS; Marchetti C; Perniola G; Musella A; Gasparri ML; Lecce F; Sabatucci I; Monti M; Muzii L
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jul; 23(7):2176-82. PubMed ID: 26597364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Propensity Score Analysis of Radical Hysterectomy Versus Definitive Chemoradiation for FIGO Stage IIB Cervical Cancer.
Tomita N; Mizuno M; Makita C; Kondo S; Mori M; Sakata J; Tsubouchi H; Hirata K; Tachibana H; Kodaira T
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Oct; 28(8):1576-1583. PubMed ID: 30095702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery in the management of stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer.
Gong L; Lou JY; Wang P; Zhang JW; Liu H; Peng ZL
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2012 Apr; 117(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 22265255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of survival outcomes between radio-chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy with postoperative standard therapy in patients with stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: long-term oncological outcome analysis in 37 Chinese hospitals.
Liu P; Lin L; Kong Y; Huo Z; Zhu L; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
BMC Cancer; 2020 Mar; 20(1):189. PubMed ID: 32138718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical features, outcome and risk factors in cervical cancer patients after surgery for chronic radiation enteropathy.
Yang J; Ding C; Zhang T; Zhang L; Lv T; Ge X; Gong J; Zhu W; Li N; Li J
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Jun; 10():128. PubMed ID: 26047616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The Treatment of Pelvic Locoregional Recurrence of Cervical Cancer After Radical Surgery With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Compared With Conventional Radiotherapy: A Retrospective Study.
Yin YJ; Li HQ; Sheng XG; Du XL; Wang C; Lu CH; Pan CX
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jul; 25(6):1058-65. PubMed ID: 25647254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy After Concomitant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Phase II Study.
Gallotta V; Chiantera V; Conte C; Vizzielli G; Fagotti A; Nero C; Costantini B; Lucidi A; Cicero C; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):133-139. PubMed ID: 27666513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Could lymphadenectomy be avoided in locally advanced cervical cancer patients administered preoperative chemoradiation? A large-scale retrospective study.
Ferrandina G; Distefano M; Mascilini F; Gallotta V; Chiantera V; Cosentino F; Costantini B; Ercoli A; Pedone Anchora L; Fanfani F; Margariti AP; Valentini V; Scambia G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Dec; 43(12):2270-2276. PubMed ID: 28988767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Open Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: The CIRCOL Group Study.
Baiocchi G; Ribeiro R; Dos Reis R; Falcao DF; Lopes A; Costa RLR; Pinto GLS; Vieira M; Kumagai LY; Faloppa CC; Mantoan H; Badiglian-Filho L; Tsunoda AT; Foiato TF; Andrade CEMC; Palmeira LO; Gonçalves BT; Zanvettor PH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Feb; 29(2):1151-1160. PubMed ID: 34545531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
