These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33166064)

  • 21. Publication bias in ecology and evolution: an empirical assessment using the 'trim and fill' method.
    Jennions MD; Møller AP
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2002 May; 77(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 12056747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review.
    Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Higgins JPT
    BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e019703. PubMed ID: 29540417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantifying the risk of error when interpreting funnel plots.
    Simmonds M
    Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; 4():24. PubMed ID: 25875027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses.
    Sutton AJ; Duval SJ; Tweedie RL; Abrams KR; Jones DR
    BMJ; 2000 Jun; 320(7249):1574-7. PubMed ID: 10845965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Practical considerations on detection of publication bias].
    Palma Pérez S; Delgado Rodríguez M
    Gac Sanit; 2006 Dec; 20 Suppl 3():10-6. PubMed ID: 17433196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessing treatment effects and publication bias across different specialties in medicine: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Schwab S; Kreiliger G; Held L
    BMJ Open; 2021 Sep; 11(9):e045942. PubMed ID: 34521659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):991-6. PubMed ID: 18538991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Standardized mean differences cause funnel plot distortion in publication bias assessments.
    Zwetsloot PP; Van Der Naald M; Sena ES; Howells DW; IntHout J; De Groot JA; Chamuleau SA; MacLeod MR; Wever KE
    Elife; 2017 Sep; 6():. PubMed ID: 28884685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of publication bias required improvement in oral health systematic reviews.
    Koletsi D; Valla K; Fleming PS; Chaimani A; Pandis N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 76():118-24. PubMed ID: 26939926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study.
    van Enst WA; Ochodo E; Scholten RJ; Hooft L; Leeflang MM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 May; 14():70. PubMed ID: 24884381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The prevalence and effect of publication bias in orthopaedic meta-analyses.
    Vavken P; Dorotka R
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 21360256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research.
    Schmucker CM; Blümle A; Schell LK; Schwarzer G; Oeller P; Cabrera L; von Elm E; Briel M; Meerpohl JJ;
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0176210. PubMed ID: 28441452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantifying publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Lin L; Chu H
    Biometrics; 2018 Sep; 74(3):785-794. PubMed ID: 29141096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. ROB-MEN: a tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis.
    Chiocchia V; Nikolakopoulou A; Higgins JPT; Page MJ; Papakonstantinou T; Cipriani A; Furukawa TA; Siontis GCM; Egger M; Salanti G
    BMC Med; 2021 Nov; 19(1):304. PubMed ID: 34809639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Statistical methods for dealing with publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Jin ZC; Zhou XH; He J
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):343-60. PubMed ID: 25363575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is there a "best" way to detect and minimize publication bias? An empirical evaluation.
    Pham B; Platt R; McAuley L; Klassen TP; Moher D
    Eval Health Prof; 2001 Jun; 24(2):109-25. PubMed ID: 11523382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How does under-reporting of negative and inconclusive results affect the false-positive rate in meta-analysis? A simulation study.
    Kicinski M
    BMJ Open; 2014 Aug; 4(8):e004831. PubMed ID: 25168036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using network meta-analysis to evaluate the existence of small-study effects in a network of interventions.
    Chaimani A; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2012 Jun; 3(2):161-76. PubMed ID: 26062088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Invited review: Use of meta-analysis in animal health and reproduction: methods and applications.
    Lean IJ; Rabiee AR; Duffield TF; Dohoo IR
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Aug; 92(8):3545-65. PubMed ID: 19620636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Publication Bias in Urology Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
    Khayyamfar A; Khosravi S; Maghsoudi R; Shakiba B
    Urol J; 2022 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 35892145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.