170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33167493)
1. Assessment of Imputation from Low-Pass Sequencing to Predict Merit of Beef Steers.
Snelling WM; Hoff JL; Li JH; Kuehn LA; Keel BN; Lindholm-Perry AK; Pickrell JK
Genes (Basel); 2020 Nov; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 33167493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multi-breed reference panel and additional rare variants maximize imputation accuracy in cattle.
Rowan TN; Hoff JL; Crum TE; Taylor JF; Schnabel RD; Decker JE
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Dec; 51(1):77. PubMed ID: 31878893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Strategies for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping to enhance genotype imputation in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle: Comparison of commercially available SNP chips.
Boison SA; Santos DJ; Utsunomiya AH; Carvalheiro R; Neves HH; O'Brien AM; Garcia JF; Sölkner J; da Silva MV
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4969-89. PubMed ID: 25958293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomic predictions for economically important traits in Brazilian Braford and Hereford beef cattle using true and imputed genotypes.
Piccoli ML; Brito LF; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 28100165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imputation strategies for genomic prediction using nanopore sequencing.
Lamb HJ; Nguyen LT; Copley JP; Engle BN; Hayes BJ; Ross EM
BMC Biol; 2023 Dec; 21(1):286. PubMed ID: 38066581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a genomic-enhanced sorting system for feeder cattle1.
Akanno EC; Ekine-Dzivenu C; Chen L; Vinsky M; Abo-Ismail MK; MacNeil MD; Plastow G; Basarab J; Li C; Fitzsimmons C
J Anim Sci; 2019 Mar; 97(3):1066-1075. PubMed ID: 30821333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Design of a low-density SNP chip for the main Australian sheep breeds and its effect on imputation and genomic prediction accuracy.
Bolormaa S; Gore K; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
Anim Genet; 2015 Oct; 46(5):544-56. PubMed ID: 26360638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Strategies for genotype imputation in composite beef cattle.
Chud TC; Ventura RV; Schenkel FS; Carvalheiro R; Buzanskas ME; Rosa JO; Mudadu Mde A; da Silva MV; Mokry FB; Marcondes CR; Regitano LC; Munari DP
BMC Genet; 2015 Aug; 16():99. PubMed ID: 26250698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of imputation to whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
van Binsbergen R; Bink MC; Calus MP; van Eeuwijk FA; Hayes BJ; Hulsegge I; Veerkamp RF
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jul; 46(1):41. PubMed ID: 25022768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of genomic prediction for German Holsteins using imputed genotypes from low-density chips.
Segelke D; Chen J; Liu Z; Reinhardt F; Thaller G; Reents R
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Sep; 95(9):5403-5411. PubMed ID: 22916947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle.
Bolormaa S; Pryce JE; Kemper K; Savin K; Hayes BJ; Barendse W; Zhang Y; Reich CM; Mason BA; Bunch RJ; Harrison BE; Reverter A; Herd RM; Tier B; Graser HU; Goddard ME
J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3088-104. PubMed ID: 23658330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
van Binsbergen R; Calus MP; Bink MC; van Eeuwijk FA; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 26381777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of variance and genomic prediction using genotypes imputed from low-density marker subsets for carcass traits in Japanese black cattle.
Ogawa S; Matsuda H; Taniguchi Y; Watanabe T; Sugimoto Y; Iwaisaki H
Anim Sci J; 2016 Sep; 87(9):1106-13. PubMed ID: 26685777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genotype imputation from various low-density SNP panels and its impact on accuracy of genomic breeding values in pigs.
Grossi DA; Brito LF; Jafarikia M; Schenkel FS; Feng Z
Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2235-2245. PubMed ID: 29706144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the accuracy of imputed sequence variant genotypes and their utility for causal variant detection in cattle.
Pausch H; MacLeod IM; Fries R; Emmerling R; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Goddard ME
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):24. PubMed ID: 28222685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imputation of ungenotyped parental genotypes in dairy and beef cattle from progeny genotypes.
Berry DP; McParland S; Kearney JF; Sargolzaei M; Mullen MP
Animal; 2014 Jun; 8(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 24840560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of genome-wide imputation in Braford and Hereford beef cattle.
Piccoli ML; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Larmer SG; Schenkel FS
BMC Genet; 2014 Dec; 15():157. PubMed ID: 25543517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for meat tenderness in Polled Nellore cattle.
Magnabosco CU; Lopes FB; Fragoso RC; Eifert EC; Valente BD; Rosa GJ; Sainz RD
J Anim Sci; 2016 Jul; 94(7):2752-60. PubMed ID: 27482662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of genomic predictions for feed efficiency traits of beef cattle using 50K and imputed HD genotypes.
Lu D; Akanno EC; Crowley JJ; Schenkel F; Li H; De Pauw M; Moore SS; Wang Z; Li C; Stothard P; Plastow G; Miller SP; Basarab JA
J Anim Sci; 2016 Apr; 94(4):1342-53. PubMed ID: 27135994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The feasibility of using low-density marker panels for genotype imputation and genomic prediction of crossbred dairy cattle of East Africa.
Aliloo H; Mrode R; Okeyo AM; Ni G; Goddard ME; Gibson JP
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Oct; 101(10):9108-9127. PubMed ID: 30077450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
