These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33167811)

  • 1.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2021 Jan; 72(1):104-106. PubMed ID: 33167811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2.
    Landess JS; Holoyda BJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2021 Jun; 49(2):231-240. PubMed ID: 33789990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rationality Was Lost on the United States Supreme Court in Its
    Felthous AR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2022 Mar; 50(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 34933935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Arizona's Insanity Defense,
    Bloom JD; Kirkorsky SE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2021 Dec; 49(4):618-622. PubMed ID: 34479941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rational capacity and criminal responsibility in the USA.
    Felthous AR
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 83():101809. PubMed ID: 35738073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The United States Supreme Court and psychiatry in the 1990s.
    Ciccone JR
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1999 Mar; 22(1):197-211. PubMed ID: 10083955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7.
    Bloom JD; Kirkorsky SE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2021 Jun; 49(2):241-245. PubMed ID: 33627379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Law & psychiatry: Does the constitution require an insanity defense?
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2013 Oct; 64(10):943-5. PubMed ID: 24081400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Supreme Court and the mentally disabled criminal defendant: recent developments.
    Perlin ML
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(4):391-409. PubMed ID: 3427241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The insanity defense: effects of abolition unsupported by a moral consensus.
    Cobun LS
    Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):471-500. PubMed ID: 6486122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abolition of the insanity defense violates due process.
    Morse SJ; Bonnie RJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(4):488-95. PubMed ID: 24335319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cruelty to the mentally ill: an Eighth Amendment challenge to the abolition of the insanity defense.
    LeBlanc SM
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2007 Jun; 56(5):1281-328. PubMed ID: 17632959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Elimination of the exculpatory insanity rule. A modern societal need.
    Halpern AL
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1983 Dec; 6(4):611-27. PubMed ID: 6364069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Insane: James Holmes, Clark v. Arizona, and America's Insanity Defense.
    Collins E
    J Law Health; 2018; 31(1):33-54. PubMed ID: 30889333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clark v. Arizona: diminishing the right of mentally ill individuals to a full and fair defense.
    Wortzel H; Metzner J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):545-8. PubMed ID: 17185487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Supreme Court looks at psychiatry.
    Appelbaum PS
    Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jul; 141(7):827-35. PubMed ID: 6731630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The insanity verdict, the psychopath, and post-acquittal confinement.
    Halpern AL
    Psychiatr Q; 1992; 63(3):209-43. PubMed ID: 1488463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Term-of-Years Sentences Since
    Piel JL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2020 Mar; 48(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 31980456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Insanity defense in criminal trials and limitation of psychiatric testimony. Report of the Board of Trustees.
    JAMA; 1984 Jun; 251(22):2967-81. PubMed ID: 6716625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.