274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33170352)
1. Use of porous custom-made cones for meta-diaphyseal bone defects reconstruction in knee revision surgery: a clinical and biomechanical analysis.
Burastero G; Pianigiani S; Zanvettor C; Cavagnaro L; Chiarlone F; Innocenti B
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2020 Dec; 140(12):2041-2055. PubMed ID: 33170352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do Metaphyseal Cones and Stems Provide Any Biomechanical Advantage for Moderate Contained Tibial Defects in Revision TKA? A Finite-Element Analysis Based on a Cadaver Model.
Quevedo González FJ; Meyers KN; Schraut N; Mehrotra KG; Lipman JD; Wright TM; Ast MP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Nov; 479(11):2534-2546. PubMed ID: 34351312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented and cementless stems.
Anderson LA; Christie M; Blackburn BE; Mahan C; Earl C; Pelt CE; Peters CL; Gililland J
Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):150-157. PubMed ID: 34053297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Metaphyseal Fixation Using Highly Porous Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum Two Year Follow Up Study.
Denehy KM; Abhari S; Krebs VE; Higuera-Rueda CA; Samuel LT; Sultan AA; Mont MA; Malkani AL
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2439-2443. PubMed ID: 31000405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Novel metaphyseal porous titanium cones allow favorable outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Shichman I; Oakley C; Willems JH; van Hellemondt GG; Heesterbeek P; Rozell J; Marwin S; Schwarzkopf R
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Mar; 143(3):1537-1547. PubMed ID: 36243781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up.
Kamath AF; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 25653322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Excellent mid- to long-term survival of tantalum metal cones in a case series of revision knee arthroplasty with severe bony defects.
Eder-Halbedl M; Fink A; Pietsch M; Djahani O; Hofmann S
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Dec; 31(12):5496-5506. PubMed ID: 37819600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short-term Outcomes of 3D-Printed Titanium Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Remily EA; Dávila Castrodad IM; Mohamed NS; Wilkie WA; Kelemen MN; Delanois RE
Orthopedics; 2021 Jan; 44(1):43-47. PubMed ID: 33284980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extraction of total knee arthroplasty intramedullary stem extensions.
Pasquier GJM; Huten D; Common H; Migaud H; Putman S
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 106(1S):S135-S147. PubMed ID: 31812635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and Verification of Novel Porous Titanium Metaphyseal Cones for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Faizan A; Bhowmik-Stoker M; Alipit V; Kirk AE; Krebs VE; Harwin SF; Meneghini RM
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jun; 32(6):1946-1953. PubMed ID: 28196619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of a technique combining diaphyseal impaction grafting and metaphyseal cones for severe bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Bedard NA; Cates RA; Lewallen DG; Sierra RJ; Hanssen AD; Berry DJ; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):116-122. PubMed ID: 32475283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stability of Three-Dimensional Printed Custom-Made Metaphyseal Cone for Tibial Bone Defects Reconstruction: A Finite Element Analysis and Biomechanical Study.
Wang X; Li X; Wang C; Geng X; Chen B; Dong Z; Li Y; Zhao M; Li Z; Li F; Wang C; Tian H
Orthop Surg; 2023 Nov; 15(11):2937-2946. PubMed ID: 37712186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty?
Bohl DD; Brown NM; McDowell MA; Levine BR; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG; Della Valle CJ
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jan; 33(1):171-177. PubMed ID: 28844630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Midterm Results of Porous Tantalum Femoral Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Potter GD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Aug; 98(15):1286-91. PubMed ID: 27489319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Excellent two-year survivorship of 3D-printed metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Tetreault MW; Perry KI; Pagnano MW; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):107-115. PubMed ID: 32475272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Varus-valgus constraint in 416 revision total knee arthroplasties with cemented stems provides a reliable reconstruction with a low subsequent revision rate at early to mid-term review.
Limberg AK; Tibbo ME; Pagnano MW; Perry KI; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2020 Apr; 102-B(4):458-462. PubMed ID: 32228079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. No Difference Between Trabecular Metal Cones and Femoral Head Allografts in Revision TKA: Minimum 5-year Followup.
Sandiford NA; Misur P; Garbuz DS; Greidanus NV; Masri BA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):118-124. PubMed ID: 27287857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of varying stem and metaphyseal sleeve size on the primary stability of cementless revision tibial trays used to reconstruct AORI IIA defects. A simulation study.
Awadalla M; Al-Dirini RMA; O'Rourke D; Solomon LB; Heldreth M; Taylor M
J Orthop Res; 2018 Jul; 36(7):1876-1886. PubMed ID: 29327379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cementless Porous-Coated Metaphyseal Sleeves Used for Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Short- to Mid-Term Outcomes.
Shen J; Zhang T; Zhang Y; Dong Y; Zhou Y; Guo L
Orthop Surg; 2023 Feb; 15(2):488-495. PubMed ID: 36479829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiographic and clinical analysis of a Porous-coated metaphyseal cone for revision total Knee arthroplasty.
Guntin J; Bartosiak KA; Della Valle CJ; Patel A; Gerlinger TL; Nam D
Knee; 2022 Aug; 37():162-170. PubMed ID: 35803170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
